eire4 wrote: » How do you like Denis Lehane? I have not read any of his books but I have one on my to read shelf.
Xofpod wrote: » I'm definitely a fan. He has a nice, unflashy style and a very dark sensibility. The detective books are good (Gone Baby Gone, etc.) and I've just started the historical series,the Given Day being the first of a trilogy. As a good starting point I'd recommend The Drop; a quality short read that will let you know if he's your kind of thing...
TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: » The Unknown Ajax by Georgette Heyer First book in a while I've been able to get properly in to. Pretty light read, like Jane Austen light, in a nice way.
bobbyss wrote: » I have some of her books but all unread so so far due to lack of time. Stephen Fry thinks the world of her. Very underrated.
eire4 wrote: » Thanks for that I appreciate it. I have on my to read shelf 2 of his books Moonlight Mile and Shutter island so I will see how I like those.
Ipso wrote: » Moonlight Mile is a follow up to Gone, Baby Gone. I think it's also the 5th or 6th in the overall series.
Xofpod wrote: » Also works fine as a standalone though. I think it was the first of his books that I read.
Ipso wrote: Moonlight Mile is a follow up to Gone, Baby Gone. I think it's also the 5th or 6th in the overall series.
bobbyss wrote: » Just started Daniel Deronda by George Eliot. A large book with, I noticed, reasonably short chapters.
TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: » The North Pole by Roald Amundsen. Translated from Norwegian it's a first hand account of Amundsen's successful expedition to be the first reach the South Pole. Purely coincidence that today happens to be the 105th anniversary of them reaching the pole. The first couple of chapters are just Amundsen explaining the meticulous prep he did before setting off. There's quite a few times where he mentions the contrast between his preparation and Scott's and already it's not hard to see why Amundsen was successful and Scott failed miserably. He gets a few very polite digs in at Scott too. Very interesting read so far.
Joe_ Public wrote: » Is my memory playing tricks or did Scott's wife have an affair with Amundsen or one of his advisers?
In 1910, she accompanied her husband to New Zealand to see him off on his journey to the South Pole. A biographer of the Norwegian explorer Fridtjof Nansen has suggested that, in her husband's absence, she began a brief affair with Nansen, the mentor of Scott's rival Amundsen.
bobbyss wrote: » I think on Eggheads BBC 2 quiz yesterday, one of the eggheads (surprisingly) didn't know Scott's rather strange middle name.Also a great read, but can't remember the title, was an account of the first trek to central Australia by two men one of whom was an Irishman called Burke I think (and Willis?).
TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: » Have developed an interest in exploration recently, no idea why, I must have a look for this one.
Joe_ Public wrote: » I love them too and the same with climbing books, replete with the obligatory disaster, i guess it's the idea of the noble sacrifice or the powerlessness of man confronted with the extremes of nature. Something along those lines anyway. Not long ago read a book by Hampton Sides called "In the Kingdom of Ice" about a US expedition in the mid 19th century. I mostly prefer reading about the Scott/Shackleton era, but Sides is a good writer and was gripped by the story.
TICKLE_ME_ELMO wrote: » I quite like the Polar stuff because it feels like the last time something on Earth was still undiscovered. It's hard to imagine being the first human eyes to see a place or the first people to set foot on a piece of land. I can see most places on earth now without getting out of bed, just fire up old Google Street View and I'm off.