Hank Scorpio wrote: » Oh, and it's not just "Art"https://s30.postimg.org/lala881dd/12345.png In an AMA reddit she stated Magik could be performed in a private setting. I'm sure the Podesta brothers wouldn't be into that kind of thing though, FRESH SPERM ON EARTHQUAKE NIGHTS while stabbing themselves in the finger is enough for them to handle.
Hank Scorpio wrote: » Trump won, Hillary lost. Nothing else matters. Try point score all you want when I've already answered the same questions you keep repeating. You're right about John Podesta, he's a stand up guy. If he enjoys playing with blood in occultist rituals he's free to do so. Being so pedantic I just want to reply with garbage but hey I'll try give some of the reasons why I think Hillary lost. Next time run with someone who isn't receiving illegal money from Qatar and donations from Countries like Saudi Arabia who are funding terrorist groups. Or being involved in deals which ended up selling 20% of US uranium to Russia and receiving donations to the Clinton "Foundation" in return. Or perhaps a candidate that wasn't at fault for four people dying in Benghazi and ignoring hundreds of messages for help, instead emailing Sidney Blumenthal pushing his agenda for financial gain in Libya. A person who let people die to hide the truth of her failings. Someone who was receiving point for point instructions from George Soros instructing her what foreign policy to implement in Albania. A person who's campaign were willing to pay mentally ill people to start fights at Trump rallies. The fake news line is the most amusing aspect of it all, your candidate had all the fake news MSM outlets shilling for her and she still lost.Not just the cable networks, the major papers too. She received debate questions in advance and had the DNC conspire against Bernie Sanders which eventually led to DWS resigning. She had the DNC writing the questions for Trump interviews on CNN. She even received tip offs from the DoJ during her email hearings, and Slick Willy conspired with the AG on the back of a plane for 45 minutes two days before the email hearings. Somebody who had an email server with no security running in a mom and pop shop putting her nations security at risk because she was running a pay for play operation and wanted to hide it. Somebody who deleted 33,000 emails and then acid washed the server after getting a congressional subpoena. None of that is fake news is it? It's truth. This thread has gone off topic, I'll leave you all to the bashing of your inferiors.
Hank Scorpio wrote: » Trump won, Hillary lost. Nothing else matters.
WinnyThePoo wrote: » I don't think you regret posting it. I think it's only a touchy subject when your thread backfired and people laughed. It's not news . It's a conspiracy theory, it's not going to congress. How is it shallow to bring it up?. Because you took some drugs and came out the other side believing in a conspiracy theory?.
frostyjacks wrote: » So I'm guessing the alt-right were behind the Berlin attack and the ambassador assassination? That would be the line of thinking from the surrender-monkeys talking about fighting all hate, both Muslim terrorists and the far right. How can they lump the two into the same pot? I don't recall Trump supporters driving trucks through a crowd of civilians. I think the penny is starting to drop with people that allowing in a flood of people from a culture that is diametrically opposed to ours isn't such a good idea.
K-9 wrote: » Works both ways, people who were up in arms about Obama will not apply the same standards to Trump.
FA Hayek wrote: » Oh agree! Obama's use of drones is well documented but he get a passes because well, he is Obama. He has also deported more illegal migrants than any president ever. Yet, he wins a Nobel peace prize. Makes total sense. The problem with politics is that people think its a team sport. They lose the faculty of critical analysis. Trump could do something good, but people will hate regardless. Of course he could do something bad and some people will love him. People need to start talking to each other in a free and open manner first and foremost.
Jep Gambardella wrote: » I've yet to hear anyone say the alt-right were behind either.
frostyjacks wrote: » Well the widower of Jo Cox had a pop at Nigel Garage for quite rightly pointing the finger at Merkel. He's connected to the 'Hope not Hate' organisation, which seems to only target pro-white groups and turns a blind eye to Muslim and Jewish extremists. They're crowdfunding to take legal action against Farage. Would they not be better donating money to actual victims of hate, like those poor souls in Berlin, than just lining the pockets of some shysters and trying to score a cheap political point?
frostyjacks wrote: » Well the widower of Jo Cox had a pop at Nigel Garage for quite rightly pointing the finger at Merkel. He's connected to the 'Hope not Hate' organisation, which seems to only target pro-white groups and turns a blind eye to Muslim and Jewish extremists.
frostyjacks wrote: » They're crowdfunding to take legal action against Farage. Would they not be better donating money to actual victims of hate, like those poor souls in Berlin, than just lining the pockets of some shysters and trying to score a cheap political point?
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Pro-white groups? You mean Nazis and fascists? You make them sound like victims. Nobody is turning a blind eye to Islamic extremism. Not sure what you mean when you say Jewish extremism. Fair play to them. He's a bigot and a liar and he deserves to be called out on his slanderous accusations. Nobody in the alt-right cares about victims beyond using them for cheap points so let's ditch that pretence please.
Billy86 wrote: » Actually, that's ignoring the fact that the alt right tend to have possibly the biggest victim complex about themselves out of any political categorisation.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » This doesn't make them victims. It makes them a load of self-pitying, pampered, selfish bigots.
Widdershins wrote: » Brendan Cox..he does not have a good reputation. He was accused of sexual harassment at Save the Children.
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Was he found to be innocent or guilty?
legocrazy505 wrote: » Neither it seems, there were allegations from women in the organisation and shortly after he resigned along with Justin Forsyth though for "unconnected reasons".
Professor Moriarty wrote: » Allegations but no prosecution and conviction? So he is an innocent man.
FA Hayek wrote: » Just on wiki-leaks, these guys were heroes of the progressives when they were releasing embarrassing inside stories of Bush, the establishment and Co. However, over the past 12-18 months, the shoe has been on the other foot, whereby they released very embarrassing stuff on the DNC and Clinton. Yet, the progressives were strangely quiet on this. Look, you are either for full transparency or not. If emails are released about Bush which you feel great about, then you can't turn around years later and moan about it when it happens to Clinton. It just shows up you for a hypocrite, playing for the team not matter what aims the team has.
legocrazy505 wrote: » Well, Trump settles things like his Trump University scam which makes him get away with it so I wouldn't really want to make a judgement when someone promptly resigns after those things although false allegations seem to be ruining a lot of people's careers recently.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3298572/New-charity-scandal-Save-Children-executive-quits-women-s-complaints-inappropriate-behaviour.html I know they aren't a great source, I wouldn't normally use them but it's the only somewhat sane source I found quickly unless you think the following is sane:http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=135177
