frostyjacks wrote: » This guide should help with your understanding.http://www.dailystormer.com/a-normies-guide-to-the-alt-right/
frostyjacks wrote: » .... but I'd argue that it's more grounded in reality than other news sites. ..
It is now fully-documented that Jews are behind mass-immigration, feminism, the news media and Hollywood, pornography, the global banking system, global communism, the homosexual political agenda, the wars in the Middle East and virtually everything else the Alt-Right is opposed to. This is, to a shocking extent, simply admitted by the Jews themselves. As such, the only way to end these problems is to strike the root and remove the Jews from our societies.
Brian? wrote: » Look, if you're not going to give me some specifics how do I respond?
130Kph wrote: » It’s handy that they have a paragraph heading called anti-semitism on that page. But given Can you clarify:- Is Anglin just trolling here or do you agree that
130Kph wrote: » Can you clarify:- Is Anglin just trolling here or do you agree that
Widdershins wrote: » I suppose you can't respond if this isn't something you've previously considered. The ''irish men need feminism'' or Louise O'Neill threads thoroughly cover the idea.
frostyjacks wrote: » If you can identify a group of people who you believe are harmful to your society, then yes, it's logical to take action to remedy that situation.
AnGaelach wrote: » The Daily Stormer is a mock version of the Daily Beast. It's not supposed to be reputable, the views are satirical. Or at least I hope so.
ancapailldorcha wrote: » This is not acceptable for this forum. You made the claim. The onus is therefore on you to substantiate it.
Widdershins wrote: » It was an off the cuff remark. An opinion.
Widdershins wrote: » Lots of division and strife. Victim fetishisation instead of actual progress toward a more accepting society.
Widdershins wrote: » 'SJWs' could encompass a number of people with a number of different causes. I am thinking specifically of self styled feminist campaigners.
InTheTrees wrote: » Yeah right, we get that. On and on with the fear of feminists. Its about the only ideology the alt right can really agree on isnt it?
Widdershins wrote: » Sometimes when people campaign for the rights of one group, they do so in a way that alienates people who aren't in that group.
oscarBravo wrote: » Well, yes - particularly those people with a vested interest in making sure the group doesn't get those rights. The shorthand for what you just described is "privilege", which is a word that many people - by an astonishing coincidence, mostly people who could usefully be considered privileged - would rather roll their eyes at and dismiss out of hand than actually stop and think about.
AnGaelach wrote: » "Stop and think about" something that is a made up guilt trip by pseudo-intellectuals? No thanks. I grew up working class with an alcoholic father and now I do well for myself. The absolute audacity of some people to say I only made it to study law was because of my skin tone, and not my hard work, is absolutely infuriating. I will never take it seriously when someone brings it up, because they have no idea what it is to be me, but are going on their overwhelmingly upper middle class sheltered life lessons.
marienbad wrote: » You take offence at others assuming 'what it is to be you '' in a post full of assumptions of what it is to be others !
130Kph wrote: » So Hitler had the right target – he just went a little too far? Or was what he did approximately the right thing?
AnGaelach wrote: » I grew up working class with an alcoholic father and now I do well for myself. The absolute audacity of some people to say I only made it to study law was because of my skin tone, and not my hard work, is absolutely infuriating. I will never take it seriously when someone brings it up, because they have no idea what it is to be me, but are going on their overwhelmingly upper middle class sheltered life lessons.
InTheTrees wrote: » You're being a buttercup. You see how the other side can rile you up? :pac:
AnGaelach wrote: » Find me a working class person who believes in white privilege and I'll find you a unicorn
Widdershins wrote: » Actually it alienates people on the same 'side' too. People with the same goals but a difference of opinion about how to achieve them. E.G Other feminists! And this is precisely why I didn't press the opinion but admitted that it's not an easy one to explain in a quick reply-it's the kind of statement that necessitates prologed exchanges and inevitably takes the thread away from the original topic.
Brian? wrote: » Hello, nice to meet you. Where's my unicorn?
marienbad wrote: » Came from a working class estate myself and lots of people from the same background recognise and believe in 'white privilege' and in particular 'male white privelidge' I can give you a few examples if you like , or would you prefer to wallow in your 'pulled myself up by the bootstraps fable ' as you search for those unicorns .
Brian? wrote: » So SJWs are militant feminists? Does that answer my question about the mess they made?
Social Justice Warrior. A pejorative term for an individual who repeatedly and vehemently engages in arguments on social justice on the Internet, often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of. They typically repeat points from whoever is the most popular blogger or commenter of the moment, hoping that they will "get SJ points" and become popular in return. They are very sure to adopt stances that are "correct" in their social circle. The SJW's favorite activity of all is to dogpile. Their favorite websites to frequent are Livejournal and Tumblr. They do not have relevant favorite real-world places, because SJWs are primarily civil rights activists only online.
marienbad wrote: » Are you saying we haven't made progress towards a more accepting society ?
AnGaelach wrote: » "Stop and think about" something that is a made up guilt trip by pseudo-intellectuals? No thanks.
I grew up working class with an alcoholic father and now I do well for myself. The absolute audacity of some people to say I only made it to study law was because of my skin tone, and not my hard work, is absolutely infuriating. I will never take it seriously when someone brings it up, because they have no idea what it is to be me, but are going on their overwhelmingly upper middle class sheltered life lessons.
Sand wrote: » The definition of SJW is below:
The mess they created is the alt-right. No action without an equal and opposite reaction.
