benjamin d wrote: » The teabag itself is approx 1c of the cost of the cup of tea. Definitely not the sellers who are the stinges in these situations.
Red Kev wrote: » Would ye not just give them the one cup between them, so they'd have to pay for the second cup? 'Oul wans....they're either stinge or they're like this..... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pk3ds-VFKBs
Field east wrote: » I think that the tea trolley gent/ /lady on a train are issued with a specific number of tea cups and must charge €2 for each one. They then return €2 for each cup sold along with the cups not sold. A very simple accountability/ transparency system. This was relayed to me some time ago as I love a cup of weak tea - and being stingy I thought that I could get two teas for the price of one. Not possible said the lady as I have to account for all the cups so a cup of hot water will cost you €2. Next time when on the train I will bring my own cup and ask her to fill it up
westcoast66 wrote: » I had to get the train up to Dublin a few weeks ago. It was off peak and full of pensioners. This aul one sitting beside me had brought her own teabag and wanted a cup of boiling water from the girl on the trolley. This was refused stating that €2 was the minimum charge. The aul one wouldn't pay it and went without. I don't know who was the worse stinge!
snubbleste wrote: » I've decided that I'm not going into all the consumerist nonsense surrounding the forthcoming midwinter celebration. I've been labelled stingy for telling people that I don't want gifts nor will I be buying any. Am I being labelled wrongly?
Amanda Screeching Housewife wrote: » A café I used to work at, a pot of tea for one was €1.80, and a pot of tea for We had one auld wan who we all knew to watch when she came in and not give an inch with that sort of stuff, she came in with her friend and tried the tea thing, wouldn't back down. Manager was in a bitch of a mood that day anyway so the two of them ended up arguing about the rather Jesuitical distinction between a pot of tea for two and a pot of tea for one plus hot water plus another teabag for AGES.
Birneybau wrote: » The aul wan.
ncmc wrote: » There's a different between stinge and theft though, my mum is in her late 70's and is very thrifty as she grew up with nothing. She'd never in a million years steal candles or sweets from a charity box!
Depp wrote: » you do notice it being very prevalent with the elderly alright, to be fair to them though a lot of them have lived through times when stinge was fairly necesery so I usually just let them away with it
ncmc wrote: » Oul ones seem to be the worst for the stinge, they seem to think their age gives them carte blanche to do what they want. We have one of those charity baskets in work where you can take sweets/crisps/chocolate and pop a euro in the box. Now a euro is actually really cheap for a bar of chocolate, you'd pay more in the shop. But the amount of people who just help themselves without paying is unreal. I've caught a few people doing it and it always seems to be older people. The box was €20 short last week, which I had to top up from petty cash as I felt so bad about it.
Stonedpilot wrote: » Seen an ould one (elderly lady) stealing the candles from a church today as I was praying. That's pretty stingy!.
sunnysoutheast wrote: » A couple of weeks ago I was in a cafe queuing up to get a coffee. This middle-aged woman was in front of me and had ordered (bear in mind the prices are clearly displayed behind the counter) something like three paninis, three hot drinks, couple of scones, couple of juice cartons whatever it was the girl behind the counter rang it up and it came to "€23.60 please". Not at all unreasonable. The wagon offered her a twenty note and said "I think twenty will be enough for that". The girl was speechless, and the owner (I think) quickly came over and said "That's the price, if you don't want to pay it please just leave". The old girl turned on her heel and walked out with her chin in the air, followed by the others. It didn't seem like the first time it had happened with that particular individual, but I don't know for sure.
snubbleste wrote: » Am I being labelled wrongly?
Field east wrote: » The battery energy used up in starting a car is restored to the battery- via the car's charging system- by the car being driven for , I understand, circa 25 miles. So if a taxi driver starts his car and drives his car for an average of ,say, 4 miles between each start he could be looking for a new battery every two to three years instead of every circa 10 years. So it makes perfect sence to up the average mileage between each start. Also it's free exercise if done carefully