Brian? wrote: » Hispanic identity, much like white identity, exists only as an abstract concept. I object to both.
Widdershins wrote: » So now it's me who is trying to convince people-even though I myself am unsure what I think of him? I added my view because I believe in a bit of balance and sharing an angle that others mightn't yet have thought of-and I take on board others views for the same reason, unless they are directed at me in a critical manner. Just allow me to comment with my own views and don't take it personally. Keep your ''calling out'' to yourself. Whoever you think you are!
Tony EH wrote: » I am not taking anything personally here, but I will call a spade a spade and you have tried to excuse him several times now. I am also very familiar with the period and type of fervor that Spencer is trying to emulate with his "Hail Victory" words. When somebody says something like that and people in the crowd respond with a nazi salute, which Spencer did not condem in any clear fashion, people's alarm bells are quite rightly going to start ringing. In addition, one just doesn't use those items from history without carrying that baggage that comes with them and if Spencer and his followers think that that is somehow OK, then they deserve all the negative judgement that inevitably arises from its usage. If you want to "reserve judgement", feel free. But Spencer's been very clear what he's about.
Amazingfun wrote: » What you said was "it doesn't exist". I then pointed you to the powerful org LA RAZA as evidence that it very much does. That you "object" to it or anything else is , again, irrelevant.
beans wrote: » Have you any thoughts on Cernovic's assertion that Spencer is controlled opposition? I see Twitter has just allowed him back on, which got me thinking.
beans wrote: » What are your thoughts on the neo-paganist movements? Would you agree that they have more claim over any European identity than this imported Jewish off-shoot that's caused more social harm than good? If the neo-paganists told the Christans to get out of their lands, would you entertain them?
frostyjacks wrote: » It's like the 'reds under the bed' scare of yesteryear. Everything that rustles the left must be a Russian plot. They can't face the reality that more and more people are becoming racially aware.
Brian? wrote: » I gave no blessing to any racial identity. I don't think they exist. Race is an abstract concept. To put simply, it's made up. People can share a common culture but there is only one human race.
Brian? wrote: » Racially aware? Do tell.
midnight city wrote: » Most of the planet don't agree with you, most people know their own race and are very aware of it. Some on the left are even saying biological sex is a social construct.
frostyjacks wrote: » White Americans are being shamed for what happened two centuries ago, being accused of having some sort of special privilege by the colour of their skin, and at the same time being told that race doesn't matter, that we're all the same. The left can't have it both ways. Race is real. Race matters.
K-9 wrote: » Mod: An admin banned the account for being a re-reg, can't manage 1 account like most of us, probably had dozend, can't abide by the rules that everybody else is expected to respect. Why anybody would bother wasting their time with them I don't know, they are probably pissing themselves laughing at ye for entertaining them. Anyway, re-reg posts banned plus posts replying to them deleted.
Brian? wrote: » Prejudice exists based on "race". Race exists as a social contruct. But there is only one actual human race. Any division of the human race based on skin colour is fabricated and arbitrary.
osmiumartist wrote: » This is factually and scientifically absolute nonsense. Different "races" (what other term do you want us to use now?) definitely do have different traits even if their environment is similar. I make no claim that one race is better than the other or should be treated differently. But you will fail every last time to try to prove there's no differences between races based on their genetic inheritance. It's a lefty liberal fantasy.
marienbad wrote: » You need to read a bit more https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/race-is-a-social-construct-scientists-argue/
osmiumartist wrote: » This is factually and scientifically absolute nonsense. Different "races" (what other term do you want us to use now?) definitely do have different traits even if their environment is similar.
I make no claim that one race is better than the other or should be treated differently. But you will fail every last time to try to prove there's no differences between races based on their genetic inheritance. It's a lefty liberal fantasy.
osmiumartist wrote: » No I don't. Race can be determined with almost perfect accuracy from blood test and DNA sample. I suppose next you tell me differences in DNA and translated amino acid sequence don't mean anything either?
Brian? wrote: » Of course people have different genetic traits. That does not mean they are of a different race. They're still humans.
