Jambo wrote: » So the Roscommon-Westmeath Boundary Commission reported back last week and reccomended no change ! I wonder when the Waterford-Kilkenny review team will report back given that their revised publication date has long since past !
blue note wrote: » Hmmm, no mention in the article of why it was better to not alter the catchment area. Presumably the town boundaries from however long ago are just perfect for now too. Hmmm, me thinks that the waterford boundaries will be just perfect too and any time anyone complains about them they can be pointed to the findings of this independent report. I'm not expecting any explanations in the report though.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Report due next week. Saw on WLF FB one TD will resign if it happens.....reported it may say approve the change.
blue note wrote: » Jamie2k9 wrote: » Report due next week. Saw on WLF FB one TD will resign if it happens.....reported it may say approve the change. I'd say he's safe promising that. There's zero incentive for anyone to push this through. The government don't even want a strong waterford. Something else to stifle our growth while the other cities pull away would be great.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Report due next week. Saw on WLF FB one TD (FG) will resign if it happens.....reported it may say approve the change.
http://www.kilkennypeople.ie/news/home/226733/kilkenny-td-john-paul-phelan-threatens-to-leave-fg-party-over-waterford-boundary-dispute.html wrote: Kilkenny TD, John Paul Phelan has vowed to leave Fine Gael if the controversial “land grab” by Waterford is successful. Phelan is gutted by speculation, rampant around Leinster House, that Minister for Housing, Simon Coveney will recommend to the Dail that Waterford be allowed take 20,000 acres of Kilkenny land and in one fell swoop, displace 7,500 people. “What hurts most is the potential loss of identity. A boundary change will damage the culture and persona of 7,500 Cats, our flesh and blood. These people are steeped in the social, cultural and heritage fabric of County Kilkenny.“The Kilkenny people living in Ferrybank, Slieverue and Mile Post are die hards who never miss a Kilkenny hurling match and are rooted in the rich history of what makes Kilkenny what it is. “And to think that a Fine Gael government could, with a swipe of a pen, make us Waterford is disgraceful. “Unless we as a county, rise up and oppose this, we will be ripped apart by the greed of our neighbour.“We need to man the barricades and keep them out,” he said. Minister Coveney will receive the report from the boundary committee in the next week or so and it's expected he will recommend implementing the changes which will see a huge swath of Kilkenny turned over to Waterford against the wishes of the vast majority of people. “Waterford has long had designs on South Kilkenny and the rich industrial zone on the north bank of the River Suir out as far as the Pink Rock, taking in the Belview industrial zone but “b]I and mine will fight them every inch of the way[/b],” Deputy Phelan said. A preliminary estimate of the value of lost income to Kilkenny County Council is a staggering €110 million. It has been pointed out by Kilkenny County Council that Waterford cannot afford that level of compensation for a boundary change and would if allowed, result in a huge cost to the Government. In what can only be described as an aggressive submission, Waterford City Council accused Kilkenny of neglecting the area. This has been strenuously denied by Kilkenny County Council. In excess of 18,000 submissions, objecting to any change to the existing boundary between the two counties were submitted to the relevant authorities.
blue note wrote: » I'd say he's safe promising that. There's zero incentive for anyone to push this through. The government don't even want a strong waterford. Something else to stifle our growth while the other cities pull away would be great.
road_high wrote: » Kilkenny of course is the sworn enemy and devil incarnate, cork aren't too far behind but not so much due to being much further away.
road_high wrote: » blue note wrote: » I'd say he's safe promising that. There's zero incentive for anyone to push this through. The government don't even want a strong waterford. Something else to stifle our growth while the other cities pull away would be great. Oh god you lot really are comical. Do you start learning in playschool how downtrodden you are and everyone else is out to get you? Other cities and towns in Ireland prosper because the people there make it so, it's not a gift from the socialist state. Despite the huge investments over the years (not in proportion to the actual population) it's still not enough. Be it hospitals, third level, jobs, roads etc everyone else is trying to keep you down, apparently. Kilkenny of course is the sworn enemy and devil incarnate, cork aren't too far behind but not so much due to being much further away.
AdMMM wrote: » Is the Kilkenny People a spinoff of Waterford Whispers? Did John Paul Phelan really say all of the below? I've highlighted the best bits that seem to make out that 7,500 will be homeless and amazingly highlights that they're all proud Cats over there who never miss a match! Not a mention of what makes economic sense and instead just emotive language centred around hurling! “Waterford has long had designs on South Kilkenny and the rich industrial zone on the north bank of the River Suir out as far as the Pink Rock, taking in the Belview industrial zone"
“Waterford has long had designs on South Kilkenny and the rich industrial zone on the north bank of the River Suir out as far as the Pink Rock, taking in the Belview industrial zone"
AdMMM wrote: » Is the Kilkenny People a spinoff of Waterford Whispers? Did John Paul Phelan really say all of the below? I've highlighted the best bits that seem to make out that 7,500 will be homeless and amazingly highlights that they're all proud Cats over there who never miss a match! Not a mention of what makes economic sense and instead just emotive language centred around hurling!
blue note wrote: » The government don't even want a strong waterford. Something else to stifle our growth while the other cities pull away would be great.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » How would that benefit the government, if you don't mind my asking?
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » By that logic wouldn't they want every city and every region to be weaker? Why would Waterford be singled out? And wouldn't ab economically stronger city contribute more resources to the state? My understanding is that unemployment and recession etc tend to drain state resources? Again, just trying to figure this out.
Jamie2k9 wrote: » Difference is Cork as the two top FF TD's, Limerick has Noonan and Galway?.....don't stick up for them and you know what happens!
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » Jamie2k9 wrote: » Difference is Cork as the two top FF TD's, Limerick has Noonan and Galway?.....don't stick up for them and you know what happens! Right, but that would just explain why they would neglect the South East, it wouldn't explain why they would deliberately want to pursue policies specifically designed to actually weaken the region.
Deiseen wrote: » Well explain to me why it has the rest representation of third level institutions in Ireland and why the IDA office was moved out of the South East a while ago, or why the hospital is not up to scratch? The list could go on
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » All of those could be explained by neglect. But ye are saying that it is a deliberate policy to weaken the city. I'm just wondering why the government would deliberately weaken the city.
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » Deiseen wrote: » Well explain to me why it has the rest representation of third level institutions in Ireland and why the IDA office was moved out of the South East a while ago, or why the hospital is not up to scratch? The list could go on All of those could be explained by neglect. But ye are saying that it is a deliberate policy to weaken the city. I'm just wondering why the government would deliberately weaken the city.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » It would not have to be deliberate policy, but the end result is the same. Long term neglect, by prioritising other regions & urban areas (probably due in part to better political influence) would also explain it. The difference is I guess, if you live in the area then it sure feels like it is deliberate. Even our national media regularly miss out any mention of Waterford when reporting on cities ...... Cork, Limerick, Galway & Dublin get listed but not Waterford. It really is becoming noticeable. Could you offer anything that might explain all this?
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » OK, but blue note said "The government don't even want a strong waterford. Something else to stifle our growth while the other cities pull away would be great." That is not the same as saying they neglect Waterford (or the south east or whatever) by prioritising other regions. It's saying the government are pursuing a definite policy of stifling growth, that this would not just be an incidental effect of prioritising others, but would in fact be "great". Now you might say it "feels" deliberate, but that doesn't make it so. And that's clearly not what blue note meant. And to me the thinking behind it doesn't make sense (the explanation that Waterford being "stronger" would mean it would have a greater "claim on resources" is very unclear). To your last question, are you asking if I can explain why the national media mentions Cork, Galway, and Limerick more than Waterford? Well, those places are all bigger than Waterford, and are therefore more important. Now, aside from that, I would have thought how often a place is mentioned by the national media isn't particularly important, but I'm assuming you see this as indicative of a greater level of neglect by government. The idea of a conspiracy to weaken Waterford is not necessary to explain anything that has happened to the city, and there's no real evidence for it either. I suppose what I'm wondering, is whether Blue note is being entirely objective here. That, after all, is exactly what this thread is all about, how Kilkenny people are putting questions of local pride ahead of what's best for the region. What I'm suggesting is that maybe, just maybe, this odd conspiracy theory indicates the people posting here might be thinking in terms of local pride as well, rather than entirely in a spirit of objective, rational thought. Certainly the anxiety over how often RTE mentions Waterford would seem to bear that out.
Johnboy1951 wrote: » I did not refer to how often Waterford was mentioned, but how it was omitted when the other cities were listed. The 'feel' is very very important. It impacts on every aspect of one's life. If you feel you are constantly being 'got at', neglected or other, then it has the same effect on you, whether true or not. So I would not easily dismiss how people 'feel' about this. My question to you was a more general one ...... what do you think would explain the existing situation that the South-East finds itself in? Whether deliberate or wilful neglect or other cause, the result is there for all to see. What could be the explanation in your opinion?
Realt Dearg Sec wrote: » I'm not dismissing how people feel, I'm saying that just because they feel a particular way doesn't make them correct. To say that the distinction between feeling and fact isn't particularly important at least has the virtue of being an honest statement about the way that politics works these days, but that doesn't mean it should be the case. More importantly, again, this whole thread is based on the premise that how Kilkenny people "feel" about this boundary issue should be ignored because the facts are what they are regarding the administration of the city. As it happens, I think that a redrawing of the boundary is eventually inevitable and the centralisation of city administration is a good thing as long as that is done democratically, so I'm not arguing to the benefits or otherwise of the issue at hand. But what I am saying is that this thread, and what we might call the "waterford side" of this argument has from the outset claimed the rational high ground, dismissing the concerns of their opponents as nothing more than GAA-jersey nonsense. Now they might be right. But taunts about Kilkenny people working in the city, or about where one county begins and ends, and ultimately about how simple-minded the objections of those people are, are never too far from the edges of this argument. The idea that the Waterford argument is entirely rational, and not at all about getting one over or making some kind of assertion of local identity, while the Kilkenny side of the argument is entirely identity-politics based nonsense, kind of falters when people make clearly emotive arguments about how the government is out to get Waterford. And I would argue that appeals to how people "feel" instead of to reality, seem to feed into the impression that this is much more emotive than people are letting on. To answer your last question, neglect explains it (no need for "wilful" or "deliberate"), perfectly adequately. I've given that explanation in pretty much every post I've put up here, so I'm not sure why I'm still being asked. As an aside, when they list those places but don't mention Waterford (again, I'm not sure when you mean, some examples might help), presumably they have to stop listing places at some stage. I'm not sure what difference it makes.
