mzungu wrote: » I would wager they would most likely be quite young. Don't get me wrong, there is nothing wrong with going to the gym in order to look good, but the majority of people outside of teens and early twenty somethings would do it because it is exercise, as opposed to feeling obligated to do it.
BabyE wrote: » Matthew 23:3
Surreptitious wrote: » It's like you're a piece of meat on the thing. It sucks
BabyE wrote: » Never has a truer word been spoken. Girls want it bad, that explains why lots of girls opt in for Tinder but they will wait and wait till the right prey presents itself. They ain't going to put out for no ordinary schmuck. BTW when I say why is 'Tinder' so hard it doesn't just mean online dating. Nightclubs, bars, college campuses you name it are places equally hopeless for average guys. I never understand when people say 'well that's Tinder'. Tinder is just a reflection of outer reality, a manifestation of the things people dare not speak out in the open. Nobody would say openly that they are actively pursuing the 6 foot 3 Rugby jock and that they won't tolerate short guys. Simply put Tinder annuls all of these conventions.
Salrub wrote: » So honest question for the women here? Would you go for a man 5ft 7" or do you prefer them taller?
BabyE wrote: » Also btw we haven't even touched on sex and stuff yet, so if you get past the first hurdle(she swipes, she takes an interest in you at the bar), you get talking and you click(i.e attracted to each other up close) you take her home, and then you go to have sex with her, how can I say this politely, size matters and girls standards of sex has sky rocketed. They know if you suck, there is a line of potential suits ready and waiting.
Surreptitious wrote: » I like all heights and don't mind anyone smaller than me, same height or taller. If they are decent it doesn't matter.
Salrub wrote: » Reason I ask is I'm that height and whenever I'm out I feel like women don't like a "small" man and they always find the taller men more of catch
Eric Cartman wrote: » I think it depends on what attributes a woman considers important. If you get with a woman who's into fashion, makeup, the gym, trends (all that other shallow crap) … chances are when you got together you were somewhat like that too, unless you're going to keep up with these trends and looking fashionable, of course she is going to stray, Similarly somebody being ambitious and career building and working hard for success slowing down a lot and settling in their place is bound to lose attraction if thats what your partner admired about you . I think lads need to firstly, stop pretending they're into things just to get women and secondly , don't just give up on your hobbies / interests etc… chances are they played a large part in what a partner liked about you. To avoid a partner straying , I think you need to be true to yourself and find somebody based on the real, true you, genuine shared interests , discussion topics , ambition levels and lifestyle desires will help keep a relationship strong.
Kal El wrote: » Thats not true buddy.
Deleted User wrote: » Anyone else prefer tinder didn't exist? Like they would have no problem not having access to lots of sex and validation provided nobody else did? The painful thing isn't that lots of girls aren't lying at my feet- it's that they *are* lying at the feet of other lads.. the same kind of guys the whole time,, with the same physical attributes.. basically confirming to you that yes, you are not good enough. When you boil it all down (and people can belittle me for being a bitch) but is it not human nature to feel unhappy and dislike yourself if even after taking steps like getting into great shape, getting educated, dress well etc. you still play second fiddle to most other lads, and you literally never can be first fiddle- you can never be that whole package that a girl is smitten over and secretly imagines marrying, is outright proud to show her girlfriends etc.. - instead it is up to you to pretend you don't feel numb and try to woo her by feigning confidence half-heartedly, watch as the girls always cling to the taller/better looking men regardless of personality and then expect a barrage of bellitlement from people when you are honest how you feel (man up, grow a set, deal with it, "people deserve to have standards"....) The distribution of lads getting girls was never perfectly spread out obviously but I bet in the past it wasn't as brutally uneven and at least I'm the old days it wasn't visible for all the see and have confirmed to them as clearly .. I'd rather by average height and good looking with no confidence (haha) than short, average/below average appearance and brilliant confidence
BabyE wrote: » Anyone have success off it, why do standards seem to be through the roof nowadays. You got to have the good facial looks, the immaculate hair, amazing body, height, charisma and all the trappings of high status and wealth and then maybe, just maybe you might snag yourself a ticket using the rebound card. What is it? Are we seeing a breathing out of the average male? Is a men only as good as his worse attribute to a women? So you might have a ripped well maintained body but by god if you are below 6 foot or that face isn't as symmetrical as it ought to be then you may as well sign out of the dating game.
Eric Cartman wrote: » mate, how could you even possibly know that. the way you keep talking its like you haven't got a tinder match to even meet with you in real life, ever. I get plenty of repeat business and know a lot of lads who do , none of us are Ron Jeremy or Christian Grey.
eviltwin wrote: » Don't care tbh. My husband would be around that height. Never been an issue for me, never had any negative comments about it.
Eric Cartman wrote: » ok, may be a bit on the extreme , but a lad dropping interests / a lifestyle you once shared may very well lead a woman to be less interested.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w5.vanillicon.com/v2/5d64887c9bc6ef1c014eb33422ffcd89.svg)
