LeeJM wrote: » The original Undertaker vs Kane feud in the build up to WrestleMania 14 doesnt get half of the praise it should. 'Taker refusing to hit his brother made great tv. And Kane was made to look like an absolute monster who nobody could stop. It was just a brilliantly simple story to understand.
leggo wrote: » Yes! Completely agree! I was on the fence about getting back into wrestling at this stage (at the ripe old age of 10, see, my tastes had matured) and only checked it out every now and then. I remember being very underwhelmed by this Stone Cold guy everyone in school was talking about. Nothing wrong with him, just a kid from Blanchardstown too young to work can't really relate to a beer-swilling redneck telling his boss to f-off. Then I remember a guy I played football with explaining the Kane back story to me in a car on the way to an away game and I was all-in. For whatever reason that whole thing just grabbed me completely.
LeeJM wrote: » Ha! This reminds me of the arguments we would have on the way to away games. Kane back then was a fascinating character. Even the mask and bodysuit was just so different to anything we had ever seen on WWF tv. Also Leggo who did you play for? Hope it wasnt Mochtas.
gerrybbadd wrote: » I was a huge Kane fan back then. I'll always remember the chills watching that live, seeing this absolute monster coming down to the ring, and ripping the cell door off. The creepy music, the diabolical Paul Bearer behind him, the pyro and THAT MASK! What a build that whole story line was. For months, Kane was teased and Taker was blatantly warned he was coming. Remember when he used to wrestle in that red light too? I think his first match was against Vader, and he caved his face in with a wrench. Good times They should never have taken his mask off.
Ben Gadot wrote: » Didn't Cornette say he was more or less handed the introduction and booking of Kane? You can tell by listening to him talk about Kane how much pride he has in him.
Itssoeasy wrote: » With regard to Kane I mean his debut was perfect. Vince shouting"that's got to be Kane" and him ripping the door off the cell was such a cool visual and no one had ever dominated taker like that. It was brilliant until they had him talk and by the time he demasked the Kane character has lost its appeal to me at least.
Omackeral wrote: » Speaking of Kane, Abyss etc. What were people's thoughts on Mordecai?
sky88 wrote: » Speaking of gallows it still amazes me he was only 24 when he was festus.
Angron wrote: » Hakushi?
Itssoeasy wrote: » Actually looking at the some of the trish and lita collection(thank god lita seems better on the mic now) and trish just looks unreal and it's the two ladies against Gail Kim and molly holly. So random thought is you'd forget how good Gail Kim was in the ring. It all looked good. Also did molly get upgrades so to speak or was it not noticeable when she was mighty mollly ?
LeeJM wrote: » Gail Kim was always good in ring just incredibly bland as a character in WWE. And from what I remember Molly was all natural. She was a proper stunner when in WCW in 99 and looked pretty much the same when debuted as Molly Holly the geeky cousin of Hardcore and Crash
Itssoeasy wrote: » Yeah to be honest I couldn't tell you what Gail's character was meant to be. I think she had a kind of bayley thing going with her with hardcore and crash and them seem to have covered her up. Also molly holly hugely underrated in ring wise.
An File wrote: » What is Hurricane Helms doing these days? I reckon he'd get a decent pop for a return.
Itssoeasy wrote: » Wasn't he in a bad accident a few years ago ? I don't know if he is still wrestling.