Quackster wrote: » Just because there once was a railway to a country town is not sufficient reason, in and of itself, that it should ever be reopened.
end of the road wrote: » or we could do both. it's what normal countries (even ones similar to us) do.
n97 mini wrote: » With what money? There are far more pressing things that need the limited amount of it there is to go around.
Carawaystick wrote: » You are advocating building a brand new railway from Youghal to Waterford? and suggesting it's normal? When even in the days the only motorised transport was railway, a line was never built linking the 2?
end of the road wrote: » they're are always more pressing things needing doing but that isn't a reason not to do the lesser things.
n97 mini wrote: » That's a contradiction!
n97 mini wrote: » You spend the money on the more pressing things, leaving no money for the things that don't need it.
roundymac wrote: » Won't happen but if it were to, the obivous route would be via Mallow like before. Terrain east of Youghal would rule out Waterford by that route.
end of the road wrote: » no it isn't. .
AngryLips wrote: » I don't know the area, but doesn't Youghal have the potential to be a good commuter town for Cork? Also, I'm surprised that Irish Rail don't want to close the Drogheda-Navan line. I've always wondered why Galway services aren't routed via Mullingar-Athlone terminating at Connolly, it seems like there is a huge disparity in service frequencies between the line out to Sligo vs. the line out towards Cork. Redirecting Galway IC services would address that a bit.
AngryLips wrote: » Also, I'm surprised that Irish Rail don't want to close the Drogheda-Navan line.
AngryLips wrote: I don't know the area, but doesn't Youghal have the potential to be a good commuter town for Cork?
hytrogen wrote: » It's one of the contributing factors to the jack lynch tunnel, south link & dunkettle interchange is jammers everyday, mostly from traffic commuting east-west bound..
Isambard wrote: » Sounds reasonable but Killeagh to Midleton is only 15km...could not what you propose be operated from there without the expense of rail re-opening? If such a network took off, then is the time to consider extending the line. Meanwhile, the car park at Midleton is rather empty indicating to me that most people prefer to drive
Logue no2 wrote: » Sorry Corky the numbers are good at Midleton and don't forget the car parking charges put a lot of commuters off using the car park.
Isambard wrote: » I wonder where the Greenway is going to go in this instance, Youghal to Midleton doesn't seem to make sense on it's own and there's little scope, geographically, for going further east. I think this is a question of jumping on the Waterford Greenway bandwagon without thinking it through. I don't think there is much potential currently for a rail link, but of all the greenways built and proposed this one does seem to have more potential as a rail link than most.
Isambard wrote: » it might be prudent in this case to secure the alignment
Isambard wrote: » ..and thinking laterally, developing Youghal as a Commuter dormitory might be it's salvation, it's never going to be a great tourist magnet again. I have my doubts tbh, but it might be prudent in this case to secure the alignment
loyatemu wrote: » it's 50km from Cork, it would be terrible planning to develop it as a commuter town. There's plenty of better places to build houses for Cork workers, Midleton for a start.
marno21 wrote: » It's a similar distance as Drogheda is to Dublin, and Drogheda is getting a DART service.