Effects wrote: » Negotiate in the beginning based on what? "Hey, in a couple of years I will be the biggest draw in the UFC and be champion in two divisions".
Saipanne wrote: » He could retire a multi millionaire with many non fighting options available to him right now, and the UFC could return to significantly weaker ppv numbers and less exposure. He is in a good position.
EagererBeaver wrote: » It's still being sneered at. It's not happening. You should ban yourself for a week for bringing Skip Bayless into anything.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Have to say I'm fcuking loving how the topic that was sneered at on this thread whenever anyone had the audacity to raise it..... is now the numero uno thanks to a California boxing licence application. #DoubtHimNow This is bit if craic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dnTnteuld8o
weldoninhio wrote: » Neither do you. In business you generally negotiate before you sign a contract or when your current contract is almost up and you have leverage. Trying to negotiate mid-contract is a weak position.
harney wrote: » This link was posted on reddit, to help explain the boxing license move. It was written a few months ago.http://www.bloodyelbow.com/2016/5/13/11669764/conor-mcgregor-vs-floyd-mayweather-without-ufc-permission
Effects wrote: » You don't really understand business, do you?
JohnMc1 wrote: » Conor is GOIN TO DO ****IN NOTHIN!!!!!!! Seriously, he'll end up in a court room before he ends up in a Boxing ring. He has an exclusive contract with UFC. Conor has also been treated very well by them. He is an idiot for thinking of or teasing walking out on the company.
JohnMc1 wrote: » He is an idiot for thinking of or teasing walking out on the company.
Tinie wrote: » Not like Mayweather would ever fight outside of Vegas. Bit of an empty bluff by him. Or just to get some headlines. Get your wolftickets nonetheless
Brussels Sprout wrote: » What were the benefits to McGregor signing that 8 fight contract at the time? From what I heard on the MMA Beat the UFC typically has a clause that they can revoke the contracts at any time thereby removing the main benefit of a contract. It seems like they're nothing but a ball & chain with little or no benefit to the actual fighters.
Lou Scaunt wrote: » Why hasn't Conor commented yet? I suppose I get it, stay silent and let social media and opinion do their work. Let the UFC sweat it out. Still though... His silence is deafening. Maybe that's what he wants?
Deleted User wrote: » How much of 203 was down to CM PUNK and how much was down to the Heavyweight belt being on the line?