GerryDerpy wrote: » Yes same applies to loans. Obviously not getting a few grand loan from credit union because you don't have cash. That's fine. But if you need a 30k loan for a car then maybe it's better to not take on the risk given the security will plummet in value.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » ....................... ............. but you are scaremongering talking about only having 5% equity etc which is just not going to happen.
screamer wrote: » The insurance companies are compunding the issue with Pcp card imho. They reluctantly insure 10 year old cars and you'll really struggle to insure older than that. This really takes the shine off buying a 3 year old car not to mention value. I think it'll force people to PCP and TBH I think the days of car ownership are over cars will be leased (pcpd) and given back at the end of the term. You'll have no value built up in an ever depreciating vehicle with a resale value of 0 at ten years.
Special Circumstances wrote: » You must be able to agree with all of the following assumptions in order to take out a valid Policy of Insurance with FBD. The Quick Car Insurance quote assumes that your car is under 8 years old and that you meet full underwriting eligibility criteria which is established through the full quote process.
twin_beacon wrote: » While I agree, and I would not take out such a loan for a car myself, but if the the person taking out the loan has the required deposit, and is able to make the repayments, let them off.
oppenheimer1 wrote: » The problem with PCP is that many go into these contracts not fully informed, and the headline figures make it look like it's a great deal. A €50,000 car costs €50,000 minimum whatever way it's financed to own it. PCP gives the feeling of ownership when all it is is a glorified lease. If you were told it's going to cost you €25k to lease that car for three years, then almost no one would go for it. PCP gives the illusion of a better deal.
Eric Cartman wrote: » you can see a shift now in PCP offers with options. VW are especially pimping high line golfs etc.. and giving away a load of extras for half nothing, realising that a forecourt full of silver, manual, cloth seat bog boxes only has so much appeal, whereas a second hand golf with an R kit, leather and all the tech toys has export sale and a lot more appeal domestically.
mikeecho wrote: » PCP is the best thing ever..... for people who rock up looking for a 3 or 4 yr old car. Great bargains to be have on a forecourt near you soon.
codie wrote: » I think people might be in for a shock when they go back after 3 years.If after the 3 years there is a new model out what happens then.Is the GFMV set in the customer getting the exact same car again?E.g VW golf mk8 out in the new year. Somebody with a mk7 trading up to a newer model is going to be asked for more than if trading against a new mk7.What will happen on PCP will it be garage telling the customer the GFMV plus 2k for coming up to new model.
mickdw wrote: » The gfmv is what will be owed. The actual value of the car at year 3 is what will decide the deposit available for next car. You are correct. That equity a viable to form a deposit will be seriously reduced if you are trading in an old model. So much reduced that the car will be worth only marginally more than gfmv meaning a cash injection will be required. The biggest point here is that this is always the case and is not just specific to pcp. If one buys a car that is a run out model, you can expect to loose your shirt if you plan to sell it in a few years. Anyone should be doing basic research before buying any car and if tying y out r self into a 3 year deal, be damn sure there is no model change coming up in that period. It's not hard to do.
codie wrote: » Agree with you its not hard to do, but bet my bottom dollar people don't. A good smooth talking salesman is all it takes .
robtri wrote: » so if the GMFV is higher than the value of the car, what happens?? and the value of the car is based on trade values or retail values?
Grueller wrote: » However people may also be caught with having to put in a large deposit and in turn decide to read finance the balance and hold the car. It is all too new here to be able accurately speculate. Our family car is 8 now so I await the outcome with interest as I would typically be a two to three year old car buyer!!!
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » I don't think you have read the thread, one of the main points people are making is 3 years old cars don't make sense at the moment as you usually can't get PCP on them so are looking at very high interest loans and the value of the cars is also quite high. People are buying new cars instead and ending up paying similar or in some cases less per month.
rustynutz wrote: » I bought a Seat Toledo on PCP finance almost 3 years ago. Up until this I always bought a 8-10 year old car, but with the NCT requiring yearly tests and costly bills everytime, and also getting stranded on a motorway with my partner and two toddlers when the engine blew on my 10 year old corolla 100 miles from home, I decided to go the brand new route. I looked at car loans and weighed it up against PCP, If you get a car loan over 3 years, even with a deposit you are looking at the repayments been double the PCP repayments, at the end of the 3 years you own the car, so what? If you want to change the car at this point for brand new in order to have a car with a warranty (the main reason for me wanting a new car as opposed to a 3 year old one, no nasty unexpected repair bills) you either have to take out another loan or pay a large lump sum. I paid 5000 deposit, monthly repayments of 216 with final payment of 7000. At the end of the 3 years I have been offered 12000 trade in value for the car, this means I have a deposit of 5000 in order to buy a new car again so my monthly repayments should be the same as I'm paying now, or I can pay the 7k with a credit union or other loan and own the car. I will probably change as I want to keep a car within warranty, maybe a kia or something with a longer warranty next time so I have the option of keeping it longer. I accept it doesn't suit everyone but to me PCP was a no brained and was by far the cheapest route to hassle free motoring.
rubbadubdub wrote: » So from my point of view I invested 6.5k (30% of cost) as a deposit on a new car for PCP deal over 2 years. MY monthly payment is 200 so after the 2 years my total investment will be 6.5k Deposit + 4.8k in monthly payments. The GFMV is around 11k I think. If I had only invested 10% so around 2k my payments would have increased to between 350/400. So 9600 in total payments if its at the higher scale. So total investment over the period is roughly the same.........So scratch that point No sane person is handing the car back and saying toodle doo. The GFMV for my car is about 4-5k below market value and that cushion is what lets you rollover again but if that market value decreases significantly then the gap between GFMV and the extra cash you may become not existent not allowing you to roll over without adding another cash deposit or increasing your payment.