Augeo wrote: » With a €7k deposit and borrowing €18K off AIB over 3 years the Total amount repayable is €20,418.48, so €2,2418 in interest. Monthly payment is €567 but there's no balloon payment. The way you phrase it is exactly how a car salesman would, and many people are dim enough to go for it when they can't actually afford a €40k car.
ShadowHearth wrote: » Obviously people miss baloon payment and just pretend that car will have enough equality left for next one.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » 576 is a lot to be paying a month. If you have a decent car already that's going to make up a lot of the deposit for a lot of people and you don't actually have to pay the balloon payment, in fact I would think very few would plan on paying it (I know personally I wouldn't, I'd be looking to upgrade). This might not go down well but PCP enables you to own a car worth 40k fairly comfortably (once you have a good deposit) even if you would struggle to afford it by getting a normal loan/HP etc and the way it's structured I actually think that's ok. Cars I've been looking at are close enough to having the 30% deposit in equity going into the next PCP. GFV of around 14k and plenty of cars for sale 3 years old for 24k or more.
mickdw wrote: » For sale but are they selling. You are basically saying that 10k equity is 30 percent so we are talking about new car costing circa 33k. They are not going to be worth 24k after 3 years. Better budget for the car to be worth 50 percent of new price instead of hoping it will be worth 70 percent. If there is a change of model during your ownership, you could be looking at closer to 5 percent equity.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » .............. Cars I've been looking at are close enough to having the 30% deposit in equity going into the next PCP. GFV of around 14k and plenty of cars for sale 3 years old for 24k or more.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » ........... Asking prices for 3 year old ones range from around 24k up to 30k. No way on earth a car like that will go bust and be worth only 5%.
Augeo wrote: » You do realise there is an amount between the asking price and the price the dealer gives you? Profit margin for the dealer and negotiation off the asking price and also money to cover prep, service and warranty. With a GFV of €14k there is a decent chance that's all you'll be getting for it.
Augeo wrote: » The 5% being mentioned is you being offered €14K + €2K = €16k.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » Yeah 1 or 2k difference not 12. There is no way on earth you are going to get anywhere near only getting the gfv..............
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » ............. If the dealer isn't offering you enough you can always buy it out sell it privately and go back in for a new one with a cash deposit too..................
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » ....... I've seen people get near 14k for 3 year old normal 1.6tdi golfs in trade ins.
Augeo wrote: » I think you have a conceptual problem with the meaning of GFV, if what you are saying is factually true and not subject to many factors the GFV would be higher
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » I know exactly what it is. The GFV is how much you are left owing on the car after 3 years. Leaving interest aside GFV = new car price - (deposit + (36 x monthly repayment)). The difference between what you get for the car and the GFV is your deposit simple as that. Good luck finding a 3 year old GTD for 20k in a private sale either btw.
Nonoperational wrote: » PCP absolutely ideal for me. Guaranteed job, easily afford the monthly payments, no service fees for the 3 years, low tax, no problem buying the car for cash at the end or going again, very low interest rates, nice new car to sit into. If I'm being conned here then sell me some more magic beans.
mickdw wrote: » To be fair, that is probably one of the better cars in terms of retaining value. VW tend to set up the pcp to leave 15 percent or so equity at year 3. So in this case 15 percent is 6k equity with a car being valued at 20k at year 3 and having depreciated 50 percent. I wouldnt be assuming any better than that. That will leave you looking for 6k additional deposit to go for new car again with same monthly. In your shoes, I would be putting 150 per month aside so that I had 5400 available to throw at next deposit if needed. If not needed, you get your new car and a holiday!
GerryDerpy wrote: » I think it's mad altogether the amount of people that buy cars on PCP. In my book, if you need PCP then you can't afford the car.
GerryDerpy wrote: » I think it's mad altogether the amount of people that buy cars on PCP. In my book, if you need PCP then you can't afford the car. How anyone can keep a PCP contract rolling for years, paying €300 per month, driving around a frugal diesel. Blows my mind to be frank.
carsfan2 wrote: » With brexit and now trump in the us the Irish economy could be in for a rocky ride for a few years. Some that took out pcp may not have secure employment going forward. I think a lot of people treated themselves to new cars after the austerity years but could only afford to if they went pcp. A lot used their old car as deposit. They may find that their circumstances have changed come balloon time and will not want or be able to put their hands in their pockets again for a deposit on a newer car.you would hope that they will be able to finance the balloon payment in this case. I think pcp is a very legitimate way to run a car but do have concerns that like many financial products some customers don't understand them.
frozenfrozen wrote: » There are people who have done their sums, they can afford a new car, they want a new car, they are posting here (rightly) upset that people are claiming anyone on pcp can't afford the car. In my opinion its simply, those who PCP suits as above, would be buying a car with a loan otherwise, what makes pcp good for you is that it's 0% or thereabouts. The reason they can make it 0% I think, is that they are 'tricking' a lot of people into getting a new car with this sales technique. PCP if it is going to POP will not be down to the people who did their sums. It's the people who walked into a dealership to buy a 7-8 year old car, or were interested in a 2 year old car, and they walked out having signed up for a 171 on PCP. Not the people who got their calculator out, or the people who picked the car they wanted, THEN the finance option to buy it.
CIP4 wrote: » Upto now the newest car I have owned was 4.5 years old so I have never been involved in car finance. However in the last few months I have been looking at brand new and demo cars. A few things I noticed, with most makes and models it only makes sense to buy brand new, demo save a few thousand or then 4 year old plus to get a substantially cheaper car. The 2/3 year old cars are too close to the new/demo prices in many cases to warrant buying them. I am still undecided about PCP. I think it would have worked a lot better if half the people had been buying out the cars after 3 years and keeping them a few years whereas as it is almost all people are giving them back after 3 years and getting a new one. For me I have no intention of getting rid of a perfectly good 3 year old car that I have minded like a baby. But When I said it to salesman that I would be buying it out after 3 years they looked at me like I had 10 heads why would I do that if I could get another new one and just pay PCP monthly repayments forever. So for me if I could get a decent interest rate on HP that's the road I would go. But it obviously works for some people and some are happy to have permanent car repayment long long term.My biggest surprise is the amount of people on PCP I have asked who don't know how much the balloon payment is on there car at all :eek: my favourite response is oh well we would be taking another new one out after 3 years as the car would be getting abit old for us at that. 90% of the time that's coming from someone who had €500 15 year old car before PCP came.[/QUOTE] Exactly, all a lot of people think about is having a new car and how much a week it will cost them rather than thinking about the overall cost. Would pcp add 1/3 to the list price of the car by the time you have it paid for?
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » The thing is someone not being able to pay the final payment etc and having to just hand the car back is actually the best outcome for the dealer as they will make a load of money on selling the car compared to taking it as a trade in or someone buying it out.
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » ................ If you can make the repayment comfortably you can afford it simple as that. I also don't see anything wrong with paying the monthly repayment and keeping it rolling so you are in a new car all the time. It's a lot less outlay over each 3 years than if you bought the car outright so you are essentially owning a new car of a lot less money and have no worries about nct, wear and tear problems, warranty to cover things that do go wrong, nice tight new cars, up to date spec etc etc.
frozenfrozen wrote: » ........ could catch a lot of people out who were counting on the gfmv being enough to go towards the next deposit..
frozenfrozen wrote: » It's a grand outcome for someone unable to keep up with payments too I think, very dignified just handing the car back compared to having to sell a car that you have a loan against or worse having it repossessed.
NIMAN wrote: » Its a rubbish outcome for them. They will have paid a deposit, 36 monthly payments and now have no car at all, so they will have to find the money to go out and buy another one.
Sam Kade wrote: » Exactly, all a lot of people think about is having a new car and how much a week it will cost them rather than thinking about the overall cost. Would pcp add 1/3 to the list price of the car by the time you have it paid for?
Augeo wrote: » Again, deposit, GFMV & baloon payment can all make the bolded piece not at all factual but many who go the PCP route are thinking along those lines as they aren't financially savvy. Over 3 years you pay out 70% to effectively lease the car. Read this....
J.pilkington wrote: » That's a very general and ignorant comment. Do you also think that anyone who takes out a mortgage can't afford the house and instead should live in a caravan?
Paisley Rapid Newscast wrote: » Does the same apply to loans? So the only people who should buy new are are the very very few who can buy outright in cash (and even those who can rarely if ever would). If you can make the repayment comfortably you can afford it simple as that. I also don't see anything wrong with paying the monthly repayment and keeping it rolling so you are in a new car all the time. It's a lot less outlay over each 3 years than if you bought the car outright so you are essentially owning a new car of a lot less money and have no worries about nct, wear and tear problems, warranty to cover things that do go wrong, nice tight new cars, up to date spec etc etc.