Christy42 wrote: » Trump already denies climate change as a plot by the Chinese. How he thinks China is modifying the data coming in from across the world is beyond me but then again he probably hasn't put that much thought into it.
wes wrote: » I made no such claim. Fact remains that some of his supporters are literal KKK, and imho its fair game to state that fact. If you want an end to being pc, and if people want to play fast and loose with the facts, then its a 2 way street.
namloc1980 wrote: » Also the power of the Electoral College depends on where you live. If you're in Wyoming there is a Electoral vote for each 143k people. In New York it's one for every 520k people. So a vote in Wyoming is "worth" nearly four times a New York vote when translated into the Electoral College.
wes wrote: » He already got the Crimea, and none of those Nukes were much good there. Maybe he will take the rest of the Ukraine soon.
darkpagandeath wrote: » Lol, Enda already rowing back on what he said about "racist and dangerous."
AnGaelach wrote: » They wouldn't be building a nuclear arsenal now anyway though, it'd take them years to reach the level of enrichment needed... And the deal only freezes the enrichment they're allowed for 10 years, it doesn't actually mean they have to dial back what they currently were doing.
AnGaelach wrote: » Chances are, Iran would've seen a middle class revolt against the Theocracy before they reached enrichment capacity.
AnGaelach wrote: » Right now, Rouhani is in a very unstable position.
Renegade Mechanic wrote: » I reckon there's a market for a piss take "Trumpnado" film..
Das Reich wrote: » Hope the takes Italy soon as the EU is forcing the country to accept homosexual marriage.
Das Reich wrote: » London is the cancer of Europe not Moskva.
Ulysses Gaze wrote: » Jeez...talk about Special Snowflake meltdowns on Twitter.....
A Tyrant Named Miltiades! wrote: » Outside of Ireland, very few people know or care who Enda Kenny is, and what he thinks about Trump does not matter.
Broken Hearted Road wrote: » She just about able to string a sentence together. When she was allowed to talk the media and people picked up on her speeches as being copied from others. God, I remember when Obama was elected. He spoke so much praise for his wife and so much. They made such a lovely family. During Trump's speech this morning - he barely made reference to his wife. There was some sort of a quick thank you or some such added in along with others but the mentioning of his wife was very brief. Shows to me that he has contempt for his wife.
Grayson wrote: » Now I'm going to have nightmares about giant trumps flying around in a tornado. Thanks.
wes wrote: » Now, there is no chance of a nuclear arsenal as the deal puts the kabosh on that.
wes wrote: » That sucks, but what do you propose? That another Middle Eastern country is invaded by the US? I am sure the Al Qaeda and the ISIS's of the world would love nothing more, especially as it would take out there biggest enemy. Or tearing up a deal that is working and trying sanctions again. There won't be the same broad support, as it the US would rightly be blame for the mess that would cause.
Renegade Mechanic wrote: » Gonna make for a hell of a final scene, driving a chainsaw through that gut!
Omackeral wrote: » I think she speaks 5 or 6 languages. So that's hardly true at all.
AnGaelach wrote: » The EU uses the same thing, it's to ensure the smaller states have a more equal footing with the larger ones. Or should Germany increase its MEP count from 99 to 228 while Ireland sees no increase?
AnGaelach wrote: » It doesn't though. It only freezes their enrichment for 10 years, it doesn't take away any of the capabilities they've built up over the years.
AnGaelach wrote: » It's not working though, and the US will come into conflict with Iran eventually. Either directly (over nuclear ambition) or indirectly (the US is allied with the Saudis and Turkey is a NATO member - both of whom are threatened by Iran's drive to become the dominant power in the region).
AnGaelach wrote: » Would you rather the US imposes sanctions again now, and sees that repressive theocratic shít-show of a regime fall under a popular, middle-class driven revolution... Or the US (and NATO) has to deploy troops to occupy the country and turn it into Iraq 2?
rob316 wrote: » She speaks six languages: her native Slovenian, and then Serbo-Croatian, English, French, Italian and German
midlandsmissus wrote: » Because you tell me I'm doing something...............has zero effect on me whatsoever. Do you think Trump has embarassed himself saying 'you can grab pussy whenever you want'.? Do you think men have embarrassed themselves on here saying 'let's grab loads of pussy', and 'the pussening'. If not, you're a hypocrite.
wes wrote: » Stop them from increasing them, and inspections will ensure that. Agreement can be revisted after the 10 years are up. The fact is that, it is working.
wes wrote: » Yes, it is working in that it has frozen Iran's programme. Again, trading a what if for a certainty is not worth while.
wes wrote: » Sanctions would fail, as the US wouldn't get the same coalition as they did before, as they would be the ones tearing up the agreement. Again, trading a what if for a certainty. The agreement is working as per the stated aim. You have no way of knowing any kind of uprising would happen in a scenarios where the US tore up the deal. Especially as sanctions would be unlikely to have the same kind of coalition. The Chinese wouldn't join in all likelihood in such a situation for example.
Omackeral wrote: » The minute you said we live in rape culture, let's uprise was the minute I stopped taking you seriously.
Jamiekelly wrote: » In 2012 trump tweeted the electoral college system was a disaster. Ironically it was the same system that allowed him to win, considering Clinton actually has more of the popular vote.
Reminds me of Farage in the UK after the general election when his party had 10% of the popular vote but only got one MP, he went on a tirade about the first past the post system and how the UK should adopt proportional representation instead. Completely undermining the whole point of constitutional monarchy in his own proud "kingdom".
Oh, has anyone else noticed the strangeness of Clinton not contesting the result? Gore did in 2000 and he had a very similar and strong case.
Am I seriously the only one who smells a rat here?
Jamiekelly wrote: » In 2012 trump tweeted the electoral college system was a disaster. Ironically it was the same system that allowed him to win, considering Clinton actually has more of the popular vote. Reminds me of Farage in the UK after the general election when his party had 10% of the popular vote but only got one MP, he went on a tirade about the first past the post system and how the UK should adopt proportional representation instead. Completely undermining the whole point of constitutional monarchy in his own proud "kingdom".Oh, has anyone else noticed the strangeness of Clinton not contesting the result? Gore did in 2000 and he had a very similar and strong case. Clinton knows for a fact that if this result was reversed the other way and Trump had lost with more of the popular vote, he would be mounting his legal challenge with the Gore defence at the very centre of it. Am I seriously the only one who smells a rat here?
AnGaelach wrote: » I wouldn't put much faith in the UN inspections, they didn't even know about an Iranian nuclear program until the Israelis told everyone about it and threatened to bomb them.
AnGaelach wrote: » Frozen is not the same as stopping Iran's program. If I pause a movie, would you say I've turned it off?
AnGaelach wrote: » And the US could unilaterally take it a step further by freezing Iran out of everything - it's been months and Western banks still haven't invested in Iran because of lingering worries about US penalties for doing so.
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://we.vanillicon.com/v2/e0a528cbc0a6c66fda22b51f3da0d9d1.svg)
![Photo of [Deleted User]](https://w4.vanillicon.com/v2/4c2f272c464d99a9eee64a80fbe71a0c.svg)
