Iwasfrozen wrote: » Look at this. Wouldn't it just make you sick.http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSR4N1D800D That's tyrant, dictator, criminal and warmonger Vladimir Putin talking about restoring relations with the US while his country still illegally occupies Ukrainian soil. I'm not optimistic about Trump but I hope he's half the strong man he claims to be and makes those words turn to ash in Putin's mouth.
Omackeral wrote: » I know this was posted hours ago but you need to get a grip of yourself. ''Of course we live in rape culture''. Who's we? Unless you live in some backwards caste system in India, no we don't. You sound like either a parody at this stage with your Let's Uprise mantra and your hashtags or more likely, a delusional college student. Either way, you're embarrassing yourself.
wes wrote: » There clearly not. Still just because there not in, doesn't mean they don't matter.
super_furry wrote: » When you look at how American elections go, it makes you very grateful for the proportional representation system in Ireland. Really in the US, if you don't like in Florida or a handful of other states, your vote means nothing and again you see that the majority of people can vote for one candidate, yet they'll still lose.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » Yeah I'm sure an organisation with less than 5,000 members swang the election.
Lt Dan wrote: » Didn't people in the east of Ukraine democratically voted to return into Russian territory ? Isn't that take over popular in that part of the country, by the locals?
AnGaelach wrote: » The only reason Khamenei agreed to the deal in the first place is because he feared the sanctions would bring down the entire theocracy they had built. In the long-run, tearing up that nuclear agreement might be the more stable thing to do in the region. It stops the Saudis/Qataris/Emirates/Egyptians/Turks from saying "Iran got to enrich uranium, we want the same deal".
wonderfullife wrote: » Can't rule out impeachment..... at some point. He's got a lot of potential problems.
wes wrote: » So tear up a deal, that is working for a what if? That is imho a bad idea.
AnGaelach wrote: » Okay, now go back to the quote I replied to about Russia deciding to eat the EU and see if your comment adds anything to the argument or if you were just trying to be a smart ass.
wes wrote: » Its AH, its kind of the whole point of the forum to be a smart ass. Still, Putin grabbing the Ukraine is not a good thing, and them not being in the EU is imho neither here nor there.
AnGaelach wrote: » It isn't working though. The IRGC are already consolidating power and Rouhani is under intense pressure domestically for signing that deal.
wes wrote: » Turns out it was the rigged system that put Trump into power :P.
Lt Dan wrote: » Nah, one man , one vote - First past the Post. (Especially in Irish Presidential Elections)
end of the road wrote: » all western countries have some sort of system to deal with those illegally coming to the country
AnGaelach wrote: » I find it strange that you're calling it "the Crimea" and "the Ukraine"... What side are you on exactly?
ChikiChiki wrote: » Is Trump going to go after Crooked Hillary now as his supporters expect?
wes wrote: » Are they building a nuclear arsenal? As long as that isn't happening, then its a success, as that was the purpose of the deal.
wes wrote: » Ok, am I being grammatically incorrect or something? What sides are there?
Grayson wrote: » And then we get Pence. A guy who denies climate change and evolution.
Grayson wrote: » Yeah. If you're in Kentucky there's no point voting for a democrat and the same if you're a republican in California. There's millions and millions of votes that just don't count.
