wes wrote: » That is not fascism....... Seriously, your just as bad as the caricature your complaining about.
B.A._Baracus wrote: » I don't see a big deal. All politicians say this and that to get in but then sing a different tune when elected. The way some Americans were going on was that they just elected Hitler of 1939 era.
AnGaelach wrote: » "We are DONE being polite" Calling all of his supporters homophobic KKK-loving misogynist Nazi racist rapists was being polite?
infogiver wrote: » A man who uses the kind of language he does about women, who is married but takes another woman to a party as his girlfriend and abandons that girlfriend at the party to pursue another woman is not someone who I can use as an example to my son as how one demonstrates respect to ones partner. From the 10 years of observation of Barack Obama, he is
arcticmonkeys wrote: » Cenk Ugyur worried the Era of Politeness has now gone. Last nights meltdown was a hoot to watch and I'm speaking as fan of the Young Turks :pac: .
ligerdub wrote: » You have no clue as to the nuances of their relationship. In any event it has no bearing on anything of interest to the public. I'm not sure of the relevance of the 2nd wife reference. Is divorce a stick to beat people with? It's a rather unpleasant business for all concerned, and I suspect anyone who has been through it would not make such a comment. It shouldn't be shamed. It's funny, when it's Trumps wife it's ok to have a pop at the relatively weak English of the immigrant! Who cares about how nice Obama was to his wife! Their phoney way of managing their public image was beyond the pale. He was a particularly big fan of using his social media to publicise his happy perfect marriage to the world. He took a lot of dignity out of the role in his time in it! Fortunately they elect the person on the strength of their credentials for the role, not a judgement of their marriages!
jmayo wrote: » Any chance that his residency could be reviewed. After all he is an immigrant.
Boggy Turf wrote: » Facebook went full retard today.
infogiver wrote: » Beware of straying into fascism. You can't stop other people from expressing themselves, by crying out how offended and triggered you are, just because you don't like what they're saying .
kunst nugget wrote: » Why would you think John Oliver would backtrack on what he said about Trump?
The King of Moo wrote: » That's overly-simplistic. If someone acts in a racist, sexist, fascist way, it's not entirely unreasonable to guess at least some of their supporters feel the same way. It's not like we're talking about two different football teams or something here. You can look at a lot of what Trump and some of his supporters have said, and the racism, sexism, and fascism is there to see.
Arcade_Tryer wrote: » The fact that Gary Johnson received 4,024,802 votes cast should show that Trump winning is no surprise really. A lunatic libertarian who doesn't even know that Allepo is the capital of Syria received 3% of votes.
KingBrian2 wrote: » What existed before was not working and it was Hillary who was accusing the Russians of hacking. She was the diplomat in all this. America's foreign policy is bogus and Hillary siding with the most corrupt and sinister countries in the world did not do her campaign well at all.
Car99 wrote: » President Trump will need more personal security than any president before him.
Skullface McGubbin wrote: » Meanwhile, the ocean of salt from lefties in the media and on the internet is fun to watch.
ligerdub wrote: » Interesting slant. Liberal sides have lost two major elections this year, both of which involved strong polling for their cause up until the vote itself. In both cases they accused the politicians/individuals on the other side of the vote as being anti-immigrant, sexist, racist, bigot, misogynists, and they extended this rather courteous treatment to those who voted against their own views. It's a rather ugly tactic used by this group, and completely ignores any other possible reasons, valid ones, for how the vote went the way it did. In both cases it's clear that the media and others are looking to find certain strands of voters to "blame" the outcome on! As usual it's open season on white males, but in no way is that ever viewed as a problematic criticism. You can add in the older age groups or "uneducated" in the blame game. The way the more fluffy kitten "think of the children" types claim a monopoly on virtue is sickening. Controlling the sentiment of the airwaves on facebook and twitter is not how democracy works, you have your say in the ballot box and that's that. Finding problems with the results of this is in some way bigoted, intolerant and in most cases both sexist and racist itself! When it doesn't go your way it's not because of racism or sexism. Grow up!
Idbatterim wrote: » I hope king spoofer Kenny isnt given an invite to the white house after his comments on trump. A school teacher - life long politician v an astute no bull****, billionaire. Sure what would they have to talk about...
stoneill wrote: » At least the first lady is the best looking in history
Hair colouring strategies for a start?
Skullface McGubbin wrote: » First Brexit. Now Trump. I think meme magic might be real after all Whether the Donald will the M.A.G.A or not, time will tell. Meanwhile, the ocean of salt from lefties in the media and on the internet is fun to watch.
ligerdub wrote: » Yeah fair cop guv. I still think he should refrain from the sort of North Korean PR show they build up around themselves, but you have a point.
MrDiyFan wrote: » http://mobile.reuters.com/article/idUSKBN1340XR Chinese Lu Kang forward to working with Trump
humanji wrote: » It's not okay to have a pop at Trumps relationship with his wife, but it's okay to have a pop a Obama's relationship with his?
