nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

El Presidente Trump

Kermit.de.frog

It's happened folks. You are only waking up but it has happened. A genuine unstable idiot has become president of the US.

I will be asleep as you wake. But I will wake too and I will also think of the consequences and wonder is it a dream:eek:

It's not a dream.

It's real.

F**k

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

kunst nugget

ricero wrote: »

Cant wait to see the donald kick ass and destroy isis

Is he going to non-sequitur them to death?

Idbatterim

Denis Staunton: Trump’s win will inspire right-wing populists across world

http://www.irishtimes.com/news/world/us/denis-staunton-trump-s-win-will-inspire-right-wing-populists-across-world-1.2861265

fantastic, I hope it does, no better place for it than Ireland! FG bending over backwards to pay off the unions and Leo Varadkar one of our "right wing" ministers, actively seeking to increase welfare above the board!

well given that all we have here at present is left wing and centre left wing populists i.e. that describes all current options politically. Maybe Renua are centre. Then bring on the bloody "right wing" options. At least the people of Ireland will then have some choice on the political spectrum!

ricero

Cant wait to see the donald kick ass and destroy isis

A Dub in Glasgo

Aidric wrote: »

If he surrounds himself with a good team who keep him in line then there's a chance this might be ok. He is way too impulsive to be left on a loose leash.

He has spent the last 30-40 years being a bully and getting exactly what he wants. I would be very surprised if he does not surround himself with Yes men

Iwasfrozen

GreenFolder2 wrote: »

I think this may well end it though.

There's already rumours of France potentially re-withdrawing from NATO as they will now allow troops and nuclear arsenal to be at the possible whim of Trump and it's strengthened their push for some kind of EU common defence strategy to replace it.

Nah, fear of Russia, (and the fear is justified) will keep the European nations in line.

Besides the Breton Woods institutons are American centric by design. Really it doesn't matter who is President.

humanji

MeatTwoVeg wrote: »

Saturday Night Live are going to have to tie Alec Baldwin into a 4 year contract I guess.

Not all bad. I quite liked those bits.

In fact, it'll be a golden period for comedy in the US, unless Trump goes ahead and tries to bans those who make fun of him like he (hopefully) joked about early on.

[Deleted User]

It's a great day for those of us with bad hair.

YES WE CAN.

Depp

TheOven wrote: »

I'm voting Trump because he tells it as it is and those mean globalist elites are mean to me.

Globalism is bad but lets work with Russia.

Trump really is a reflection of his followers. Can't wait to see the war on christmas this year.

thinking good diplomatic relations with russia is globalism shows complet lack of understanding what globalism is.

GreenFolder2

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

America has been doing that since WW2.

I think this may well end it though.

There's already rumours of France potentially re-withdrawing from NATO as they will now allow troops and nuclear arsenal to be at the possible whim of Trump and it's strengthened their push for some kind of EU common defence strategy to replace it.

Iwasfrozen

GreenFolder2 wrote: »

He's the leader of the United States.

The free world has a load of other leaders. He can feck off if he thinks he's leading places that never voted for him!

America has been doing that since WW2.

GreenFolder2

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

President Trump.

****ing Trump.

This moron is the leader of the free world.

He's the leader of the United States.

The free world has a load of other leaders. He can feck off if he thinks he's leading places that never voted for him!

wes

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

If Russia want to lower hostilities they should be prepared to cease their illegal occupation of Ukrainian Crimea.

Finally, someone pointed why there is tension with Putin. The way some people are talking about him, you would think he was a lovely Teddy Bear.

Some people seem to be going all Chamberlain on us......

Cienciano

rob316 wrote: »

I cant wait for John Oliver's next show, I think he's excellent but he slaughtered Trump at every opportunity. Its the back tracking of all those who said it was "unthinkable" "unimaginable" will be glorious to watch and pure entertainment.

I absolutely love an upset.

They're not going to back track. Why would they? It'll be funny to see them making fun of the president and Trump doing his best to get them taken off the air.

Iwasfrozen

Jelle1880 wrote: »

I wonder if Trump will stop the economic sanctions against his pal Putin.

He doesn't have the power to do that. And the GOP control Congress. The same GOP that hate his guts and hate Russia even more.

So no, basically.

Shelga

Hillary Clinton predicted to win popular vote by more than 1%.

Why doesn't the US elect their president based on the popular vote? Is it to make the result more of a 'sure thing' and avoid the chaos of having to recount every vote nationally in the event of a close race?

How often do they change the number of electoral college votes a state has? For example, if there was a mass exodus from California to Wyoming (:pac:), when would this be reflected in the number of college votes afforded to each state?

wes

TheOven wrote: »

Trump really is a reflection of his followers. Can't wait to see the war on christmas this year.

I, for one will be celebrating Christmahanukkaheidkwanzaa!

Jelle1880

Iwasfrozen wrote: »

If Russia want to lower hostilities they should be prepared to cease their illegal occupation of Ukrainian Crimea.

I wonder if Trump will stop the economic sanctions against his pal Putin.

Iwasfrozen

Depp wrote: »

no particular goals just a lowering of tension and the reduction of the chances of nuclear war...I'm not saying they should form the ''coalition of the willing part II'' im just suggesting that a good diplomatic relationship between the two isnt exactly the worst idea

If Russia want to lower hostilities they should be prepared to cease their illegal occupation of Ukrainian Crimea.

TheOven

wes wrote: »

Its hilarious that for a group of people complain about special snowflakes and being pc, that some of them are exactly that themselves.

I'm voting Trump because he tells it as it is and those mean globalist elites are mean to me.

Globalism is bad but lets work with Russia.

Trump really is a reflection of his followers. Can't wait to see the war on christmas this year.

Iwasfrozen

President Trump.

****ing Trump.

This moron is the leader of the free world.

Jelle1880

Depp wrote: »

no particular goals just a lowering of tension and the reduction of the chances of nuclear war...I'm not saying they should form the ''coalition of the willing part II'' im just suggesting that a good diplomatic relationship between the two isnt exactly the worst idea

True, but neither Putin nor Trump can be trusted to keep that going I feel.

It's good that for now relations seem to be a bit better, but I think that's only because Putin knows Trump has zero experience in politics and he feels he can use him.

Depp

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Working together to what end ?

The US' and Russia's goals are completely opposite of each other. Only in Syria/Iraq would they probably get along, and probably only temporarily.

no particular goals just a lowering of tension and the reduction of the chances of nuclear war...I'm not saying they should form the ''coalition of the willing part II'' im just suggesting that a good diplomatic relationship between the two isnt exactly the worst idea

wes

TheOven wrote: »

They voted for the party of personal responsibility, they should be personally responsible.

Its hilarious that for a group of people who complain about special snowflakes and being pc, that some of them are exactly that themselves.

MeatTwoVeg

Saturday Night Live are going to have to tie Alec Baldwin into a 4 year contract I guess.

kunst nugget

Sonics2k wrote: »

Ronald Reagan had alzheimer's.

That would probably put him on a par with Trump.

Jelle1880

Depp wrote: »

id much rather them working together than a potential act of war by militarily enforcing a no fly zone in an area littered with russian planes...now that, would be terrifying!

Working together to what end ?

The US' and Russia's goals are completely opposite of each other. Only in Syria/Iraq would they get along, and probably only temporarily.

TheOven

mansize wrote: »

The alienation, marginalisation and neglect of white lower socioeconomic groups caused this shift to the right. Don't blame the voters.

They voted for the party of personal responsibility, they should be personally responsible.

Sonics2k

oik wrote: »

Total lack of political understanding.

Is the next president.

Pick one.

George W. Bush.
Ronald Reagan had alzheimer's.

Depp

Doctor Jimbob wrote: »

I see where youre coming from there, but to me the idea of two such powerful countries with unstable leaders being open to the idea of working together is terrifying.

id much rather them working together than a potential act of war by militarily enforcing a no fly zone in an area littered with russian planes...now that, would be terrifying!

Easy Rod

Widdershins wrote: »

It doesn't sound like you have read it.

He was demonstrating the reporter was flustered because he was forced to backtrack and deny an article he'd written. As pointed out the reporter doesn't have cerebral palsy or any disability that would make him flap his arms. The reporter's arm is frozen, so it doesn't add up that trump was imitating him.
There's a few videos on that catholics4trump link showing him making the same gesture when he's talking about opponents and it's obvious hes not making a comment on a disability.

Is there a reasons why the fact that they're catholics for trump should negate what evidence they've compiled and shown on that page? Because it sounds a bit bigoted when people keep bringing up their name.

''He just definitely is'' in the face of evidence to the contrary obviously isn't going to wash.

You don't understand why a source called 'Catholics for Trump' might not be approaching this subject in an objective manner?

They have not provided facts just their (biased) (mis)interpretation.

"But...but... he waved his arm around so he couldn't possibly be mocking him" is like saying he didn't mock someone in a wheelchair because he wasn't fully seated when he did the impression.