ligerdub wrote: » No he's not, and that's Mr President now.
Deleted User wrote: » That Hillary must be an absolutely awful example of one.
dav3 wrote: » I didn't know we had a county Sweden.
hannible the cannible wrote: » I love it , I love the uncertainty , I love that the liberal left thinking love everyone morons are crying into their cornflakes , I love the chaos involving it , the media bubble is burst and the once great nations of Britain and America can once again hold there heads up high , brexit first , now trump , brilliant , the commoner garden man has spoken and the establishment doesn't like what he has to say , this is what happens when you have years of ignorance and abuse of the silent majority , the world is changing and Europe and Ireland are getting left behind
AnGaelach wrote: » They did, whether or not there's actually any truth to the matter is up to the courts to decide (I honestly don't know whether he's in court over it or not). Reading Clinton's emails on wikileaks (she was going to run a smear campaign against Obama being a coke addict), I wouldn't be too surprised to think that she nudged them into it.
midlandsmissus wrote: » Didn't he mock a disabled person? This f#cking world. It's full of hate.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » The amount of butt-hurt and tantrums from dejected Clinton supporters/Trump haters is hilarious this morning to be honest. Precious SJW's and snowflakes who can't deal with the reality that the world is very different beyond the confines of their self-validating safe spaces online The world won't end (in fact it's got a better chance of that now that we won't have Clinton pushing Putin into a corner), the more "extreme" soundbites and electioneering promises will be softened and dropped to win support from Congress and the Senate and Trump will be more like Regan in the end than the Antichrist that the above groups are making him out to be... and Regan ended up as one of the more popular presidents remember and one who also reached out to Russia and settled tensions there.
_Kaiser_ wrote: » The amount of butt-hurt and tantrums from dejected Clinton supporters/Trump haters is hilarious this morning to be honest. Precious SJW's and snowflakes who can't deal with the reality that the world is very different beyond the confines of their self-validating safe spaces online
Arcade_Tryer wrote: » Hold on, how can someone be an absolutely awful example of a woman? How should a woman be in your opinion? From the way she talked and the way she conducted herself, she struck me as a pretty decent human being. Trump did not. And the evidence is there from his speeches.
Lt Dan wrote: » So what if he is racist or homophobe or misogynist? The Courts in the US will put a stop to any discriminating plans, as will the two Houses. The people want a better economy and we in Europe want to ensure that his foreign policy does not adversely affect us. 9/10 the ordinary American will not give a damn about his homophobic , racist etc views if they have a few more bucks in their pocket. They are more concerned about the bread and butter issues
flazio wrote: » Will the hate between the classes and demographics ever go away?
_Kaiser_ wrote: » You know exactly what he/she meant though - but let's go on pretending that mass (illegal) immigration of peoples with a culture and religion that is so incompatible and hostile to our own Western values won't be (or isn't already) an issue Be grand sure... :rolleyes:
Lt Dan wrote: » The disabled person, a journalist was perfectly able to get smart arsed about Trump when he put questions to him. Fair game!
Cortina_MK_IV wrote: » On the plus side the first lady is an absolute bang! :P
midlandsmissus wrote: » I forget, I said it last week, 'I can do whatever I want, grab men by the dick if I want' Hwar har har Scumbag Didn't a 12-13 year old accuse him of rape?
NI24 wrote: » Yes imagine that. Imagine people being upset that a sleazy misogynistic reality star with no political experience or moral compass was elected to the presidency. It must be because they can't "deal with reality".
Hank Scorpio wrote: » You can if you want, nobody will care or cry foul because they can't hear you. He was in a private setting with people he trusts and didn't know he was being recorded. Does that excuse him? IMO it does. You're implying he walked up to a microphone and said it. It's totally different. The 13 year old dropped the case, another smear campaign. Voluntarily, no payoff.
midlandsmissus wrote: » They do care when women came forward and said he actually touched their vagina. This is a criminal offense. But of course we live in rape culture, and it's out in force again. Would you like to be a woman in this world?
