MayoForSam wrote: » That was Conor Cruise O'Brien BTW, not Charlie. But it does sum up what has happened - not quite unprecedented though i.e. Brexit. Le Pen in France up next? But the people have spoken, life will have to go on.
signostic wrote: » What it will mean for Ireland, return of of thousands of Irish to Ireland who are illegal in the US reduced investment in Ireland by US companies J1 visa program abolished awkward St Paddy's day ahead anything good come out it for us?
NI24 wrote: » What ridiculous logic. You're assuming they would have voted for Trump despite the fact that they had the chance and didn't? Yeah makes sense.
signostic wrote: » What it will mean for Ireland, return of of thousands of Irish to Ireland who are illegal in the USreduced investment in Ireland by US companies J1 visa program abolished awkward St Paddy's day ahead anything good come out it for us?
ligerdub wrote: » The smugness in the political pundits on RTE in the early coverage last night was incredible. They were practically making plans for an early end to proceedings and joking about the early night they were going to have. They had a good old laugh about it. Well they weren't laughing a couple of hours later, it was like a wake in there. When the tide had turned there the comments started to take a more sinister accusatory tone, the usual baseless platitudes. I see the usual social media blaze up when something doesn't go the way of liberal sorts, but that's to be expected, and to be honest make it even better. All hail President Trump!!
Deleted User wrote: » Hillary would have read her victory speech of a teleprompter and would have had a dig at Trump's supporters.. Trump just spoke and talked of co-operation with other countries from his heart. (I didn't catch all of it though). I don't like him (I just despise her) but it was good to see. I wanted to meet an American friend who I knew would take it badly so I could take his mind of it but he wouldn't.. His English girlfriend is crying and he said he had been as well. They just didn't see it coming. A week ago, we had a big sane discussion on who might win and they couldn't for the life of them see how it was possible. When I heard it was over, I felt happy Hillary didn't succeed but also felt bad for good people whose world has just stopped making sense.
Deleted User wrote: » 42% of women who voted did so.. So it's safe to say 42% of eligible women would have if they turned out.
iLikeWaffles wrote: » The difference in votes just under the status bars. So hold the phone why didn't the other parties get included in the debates. Would have been a much different result!
Depp wrote: » so its completely impossible people saw hillary as corrupt and didnt want that in the white house?
BoatMad wrote: » ( which is fundamentally , that no-one needs theirs skills )
NI24 wrote: » 43% of all eligible voting women voted for Trump huh? I mean, are you for real? And yes, they are sexist. I would know, I'm surrounded by Trump supporters.
Deleted User wrote: » 190,000 votes where? Not sure what you mean. And yeah, Johnson and Stein took in a good few votes. Mc Mullin in Utah took 20% of the state's vote.
NI24 wrote: » 43% of all eligible voting women voted for Trump huh? I mean, are you for real?
Rayne Easy Paste wrote: » 3) Possibility of a catastrophic trade war between the US and China;
Rayne Easy Paste wrote: » 4) Zero chance of increased international cooperation to slow climate change, and probably a reversal of the previous, tentative Paris Agreement.
abff wrote: » First Brexit, now Trump. Another victory for the politics of hate. It's a sad, misguided world we're living in.
NI24 wrote: » Well, seeing as how they didn't see it in either bush sr, bush jr., or bill clinton, then yeah I'd say so.
Burial. wrote: » So 43% of women in America are sexist yeah? You just have to laugh at this sh*t :pac:
It is fine for the university educated working in the tech sectors who have jobs in the new west, but the ordinary grunts who used to get manufacturing or mining jobs have nothing often bar condescending remarks about how they need to upskill to be part of the new economies.
valoren wrote: » Reminds me of Haughey's GUBU remark 'grotesque, unbelievable, bizarre and unprecedented' That sums it up for me.
iLikeWaffles wrote: » https://www.google.ie/#safe=off&q=trump+states+won 190,000 votes !? Was there other candidates for other parties?
jmayo wrote: » Isn't it about time you changed to your new title Mr President. I raise you Dell, Facebook, Google, Paypal, etc, etc. Intel is one of the few multinationals that has money actually really investment in buildings or infrastructure. The rest is office space. And yes we know about data centres but they can be run from anywhere.
Lone Stone wrote: » Bernie would have wiped the floor with him
NI24 wrote: » Pretty pissed off. Sexist ignoramuses voted a buffoon into office.
BoJack Horseman wrote: » Like Brexit. The elites will spit feathers. There is a slight.... slight chance they will learn from this. People were tired of the status-quo. Remember, the fringes do better when the center fails..... And it has failed. Donny will serve 4 years and may well lose reelection, if he bothers to run. But both the GOP and Dems need to take stock and start listening to people instead of sneering with contempt. Political revolution can be a good thing & shouldn't necessarily be feared, whether it's britain, Greece, Spain or the US. The elites will sneer & mock, but they have been rattled.