judeboy101 wrote: » Union following 1916 approach, blood sacrifice etc. We need to suffer and it needs to be shown to membership how management, parents and trustees care nothing for us. That way the failure will be less harmful to the union in the future. Kinda like hardening a stick by burning away the softness.
political analyst wrote: » The ASTI was down that road before. The reputation of secondary teachers was damaged by the industrial action that took place in 2000 and 2001.
deiseindublin wrote: » No progress today.http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/schools-set-to-stay-shut-on-monday-as-asti-talks-conclude-for-the-evening-35191074.html
Gebgbegb wrote: » How long is their school day? If they are on full time when do they do corrections. Fair play if they can get it all done during the day but I find it hard to believe... Did they tell you they never do 39hrs? I'm intrigued.. What's their subjects?
feardeas wrote: » I hope that's hyperbole. If not members need to leave like the wild geese (to borrow from another historic moment.)
judeboy101 wrote: » No constitutional right to secondary education only primary didn't that yank in cork try that with her autistic son and supreme count ruled only primary?
km79 wrote: » maybe it's us that will concede ......
km79 wrote: » I think the Landscape has now changed significantly The nurses are now balloting for strike LRA is a dead duck We do not need to be sacrificial lambs now Union needs to realize this ........
man_no_plan wrote: » If this drags on it will have to go to the labour court. Will they be likely to better the agreement they hammered out with the other unions? Until this payroll/lockout craic started the ASTI were half okay. If you gain a bit well and good if you don't there's still the bit to be got from the other agreement. The problem now is the personal cost to teachers might be a bit high. Would the ASTI lift the directive on principals for a week to let them sort external supervisors? Might let the schools open and take the pressure off, there will hardly be enough people interested in doing the supervision which might close the schools anyway. At least it would leave teachers in the clear. Or would that be seen as a sign of weakness? If the DES back down on the 33hours its game over for LRA.
deiseindublin wrote: » I don't understand how CP hours are such a big issue for ASTI/Bruton when they didn't even figure in the GRA talks.
Villain wrote: » Timing is the issue though, it's going to take time for that Landscape to change and in the mean time the Dept is going to hold firm and there won't be anything for ASTI to suspend action on and ballot unless they fold, timing is everything!
political analyst wrote: » What is the exact reason for the Govt's refusal to pay ASTI members for S&S (apart from the ASTI's rejection of LRA)?
paddybarry wrote: » ASTI have the upperhand now. This is no time to panic. This is a battle we cannot afford to lose. Longer next week drags on without schools open, the greater will be the pressure on the government.
paddybarry wrote: » heres a reasonable suggestion - pay teachers the money owed under haddington road. S and S issue solved and schools open.
Peppa Pig wrote: » Is this strike not about newer teachers pay. How will S&S payments open the schools on Tuesday?
paddybarry wrote: » There are four issues at play 1. Equal pay for LPTs 2. S and S payments 3. Croke Park Hours 4. JC reform