nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Are American voters really stupid?

VladamirP

With a few days to go in the presidential race for the USA, I'm thinking to myself are yankee's really that thick to be cattle herded into a 2 vote system (I know theres more canditates,but!), a country with 300+ million people, and they get to choose between donald and hillary, 2 azzholes.

I don't know if it's intentional or not but US politics has turned upside down, it was always corrupt, but now it's taken a stranger twist, CNN V's Fox, all establishment establishment's but are they doing a Freud on the dumb people of America, which is a good proportion of the non natives.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

RayM

The Irish electorate came within a fake tweet of electing Sean Gallagher as president, so let's not get too cocky.

A Little Pony

Its the damn Yankees you need to watch like Hillary Clinton and her cronies.

Pugzilla

Danny Healy-Rae

Your Face

VladamirP wrote: »

I'm thinking to myself

One does live in hope.

hairyslug

Now that the outrage has slightly died down about her emails the next thing is her affiliation with the devil

Timberrrrrrrr

hairyslug wrote: »

Now that the outrage has slightly died down about her emails the next thing is her affiliation with the devil

She knows Gerry Adams?

degsie

At least it's better than the Russian half baked presidential election system.

jackwigan

Does any country get it right though?

It's the same thing everywhere as far as I can see.

20Cent

Yes, a large proportion of them are deeply stupid people.

degsie

Pugzilla wrote: »

Danny Healy-Rae

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDaLMNq9PW4

VladamirP

It's a farce, if anybody need's glasses I have lens from 0.005 to 3.30, that's a lot of range.

VladamirP

Danny healy rae is actually a better president to the 2 nominees

DEFTLEFTHAND

I thought this would be the election where a third party candidate could enter the ring as a legitimate contender.

There is so much division and strife in the two establishment parties, it's obvious that sizeable sections of each dislike their nominated candidate.

Didn't happen though.

Jimbob1977

Don't blame me.

I voted for Kodos

BoJack Horseman

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

I thought this would be the election where a third party candidate could enter the ring as a legitimate contender

That did happen.

The GOP hates Trump & he hates the GOP.

He's a 3rd candidate who just happened to hijack the GOPs nomination race.... And after Tuesday there won't be hide nor hair of him around anything to do with the Republicans ever again.

tomwaterford

BoJack Horseman wrote: »

That did happen.

The GOP hates Trump & he hates the GOP.

He's a 3rd candidate who just happened to hijack the GOPs nomination race.... And after Tuesday there won't be hide nor hair of him around anything to do with the Republicans ever again.

Tbf..... It would be hilarious and if he pulls it off

*nuclear war aside :pac:

VladamirP

DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: »

I thought this would be the election where a third party candidate could enter the ring as a legitimate contender.

There is so much division and strife in the two establishment parties, it's obvious that sizeable sections of each dislike their nominated candidate.

Didn't happen though.

I think there's 4, 2 women, 2 men

Edit: All *****

Wanderer78

signs of a failing political system!

bazz26

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MOwesWn3vU4

midnight city

We had Bertie Ahern for 10 years

osmiumartist

I could answer "yes" to the question but that wouldn't mean they were special in that regard.

fryup

midnight city wrote: »

We had Bertie Ahern for 10 years

and don't forget Charlie

osmiumartist

midnight city wrote: »

We had Bertie Ahern for 10 years

We still welcome him with open arms across the country and on TV!

Wanderer78

osmiumartist wrote: »

We still welcome him with open arms across the country and on TV!

errr emm, i dont

osmiumartist

Wanderer78 wrote: »

errr emm, i dont

Yeah, but that's like saying "we" didn't vote Bertie in because "I" didn't vote Bertie in.

Wanderer78

osmiumartist wrote: »

Yeah, but that's like saying "we" didn't vote Bertie in because "I" didn't vote Bertie in.

errr emm i didnt, ff have never made it on my ballot paper, but obviously he made it onto many others

osmiumartist

Wanderer78 wrote: »

errr emm i didnt, ff have never made it on my ballot paper, but obviously he made it onto many others

No idea if you're deliberately missing the point at this stage.

Dyr

RayM wrote: »

The Irish electorate came within a fake tweet of electing Sean Gallagher as president, so let's not get too cocky.

That dribbling galoot "Oim an Ontrapanoor", thank god for shinner ambushes.

We've also managed to have Inda as Teeshock for the last millionty years or so

Gbear

midnight city wrote: »

We had Bertie Ahern for 10 years

Ah here, there's absolutely no comparison.

Dodgy politicians are one thing - they're as old as time itself.

Knowingly electing a guy who's an outright predator, both in business terms and as far as we can tell, in sexual assault terms as well, a guy who's never held any elected office, who preaches absolute ****ing madness at his rallies and very obviously doesn't give a **** about anyone - there's not even a veneer of it - is quite another matter.

The only thing his supporters can point to as a positive for him are his business achievements, but his results are scarcely better than chance and include multiple bankruptcies
Also, they seem to like how much of an asshole he is, which is apparently a good thing now.

Say what you want about our politicians, but they tend to fall within a fairly small range and tend towards blandness and ineffectiveness rather than anything else.
You'd never have a loola like Trump or an arsehole of the scale of Clinton eleceted here. Our politics is too safe and too neutral.

ligerdub

tomwaterford wrote: »

Tbf..... It would be hilarious and if he pulls it off

*nuclear war aside :pac:

More likely to see war quicker, and a more dangerous one, were Clinton to win, a singular point completely ignored by 95% of people (percentage estimated and exaggerated for emphasis).