kevthegaff wrote: » Maize. Beet pulp, barley, soya bean hulls 14% nut 230
jaymla627 wrote: » Yes ordered stuff listed above, rep admitted he was at fault apparently can't be taken back out so got him to knock a 100 a ton of price, may just feed a bit extra to make up for crap ingrediants
GrasstoMilk wrote: » Have samples sent off to bagnelstown also so be interesting to see how they compare
whelan2 wrote: » maize /wholecrop test takes longer and costs more than ordinary silage test, I learnt the hard way you have to specify you want the specific test
freedominacup wrote: » Absolutely can be taken back. You didn't get what you ordered you have no obligation to pay for it. Tell them it's available for collection until tomorrow. After that you're dumping it. I've had two batches taken back over the past few years.
jaymla627 wrote: » Only that I'll probably get another 3 weeks out at grass I would of had it taken back cows shouldn't drop to much on it also got a very good deal on the next load I get of what I wanted in the first place but will more then likely will just order of the mill I do 90% of my business with
Injuryprone wrote: » It is possible for them to suck the nuts out of the bin. I had it here when they blew the weanling nut ( no calmag) into the dairy bin. At 180 /tonne, I dunno are they loosing out too much on the spec you called out, when you see what people above are getting for 220-240.
freedominacup wrote: There's no way that ration has 14% pr. Nothing in it to get you to 14.
mahoney_j wrote: » I do 100% of my dairy feed business with one company and have done so for last 4 years .never got as much as 1 bad load ,excellent nutritional back up without the pushy sales push ,competitive price ,excellent quality feed and no issues as regard making a special .my nut contains the same ingridents all year with alterations made for protein and fibre content at stages of the year .ive even had our group in for a tour of feed mill followed by an open q&a and also had nutritionist out to attend 1 group meeting per year .no charge and no bull**** .i do ring around once a year to get a price on what mix I'm using and there never beaten .credit is flexible within reason ,no money collected till late April may and I clear balance at year end .brandy ,2 bottles of wine and a few calendars lobbed in my door too at Xmas
pedigree 6 wrote: » Getting 100t of All calcium lime delivered and spread next week for 22.50/t. How does that sound?
Keepgrowing wrote: » Cows in tonight, that's grazing done for this year
RightTurnClyde wrote: » I'm dealing with the same crowd. They're a pleasure to deal with and provide an excellent service. A few coops could do with taking a leaf out of their book, with regards how to treat their customers.
mf240 wrote: » Cows more or less on silage here but going out for a few hours. Slow learner so will graze when it's dry and leave in next Feb march if it's wet .
mf240 wrote: » What creamary are you supplying this week.?:D
Timmaay wrote: » Must be even slower here, they are still full time on grass.
mahoney_j wrote: I do 100% of my dairy feed business with one company and have done so for last 4 years .never got as much as 1 bad load ,excellent nutritional back up without the pushy sales push ,competitive price ,excellent quality feed and no issues as regard making a special .my nut contains the same ingridents all year with alterations made for protein and fibre content at stages of the year .ive even had our group in for a tour of feed mill followed by an open q&a and also had nutritionist out to attend 1 group meeting per year .no charge and no bull**** .i do ring around once a year to get a price on what mix I'm using and there never beaten .credit is flexible within reason ,no money collected till late April may and I clear balance at year end .brandy ,2 bottles of wine and a few calendars lobbed in my door too at Xmas
Keepgrowing wrote: » Why don't you go and take a long walk off a short pier...... Edited by Mod to ensure the correct meaning is taken up...... and avoid more RPs to deal with.
Keepgrowing wrote: » That's not what I meant.