jimgoose wrote: » Nicely-upholstered. The sort of woman who's shoulders and arms I'd like. It's Yiddish for "juicy".
RWCNT wrote: » Eight different male body types!? Is your name Mac and do you co-own a bar in Philadelphia by any chance?
Colser wrote: » Accountants stick around and have small feet ðŸ˜WTF
anna080 wrote: » When guys say "curvy girls" what exactly are they taking about? I remember my male friend saying he loved curvy girls and then proceeded to say Emily Ratajowski fitted the profile of curvy. She's no more curvy than my little toe. To me curvy would be Holly Willoughby or Kardashian arse
DrPhilG wrote: » Your friend really means big boobed. Emily certainly has that, but she is definitely not curvy as I would define it. Holly Willoughbooby is the definition of curvy.
pilly wrote: » Holly Willoughbooby is so gorgeous, as a female non-lesbian I could look at her all day.
jimgoose wrote: » As a male non-lesbian, I heartily concur!
armaghlad wrote: » A girl I went on a date with last Friday, she's pure gorgeous in my eyes, she is not skinny but not in anyway fat or overweight, she has imo a great physic, what I'd describe as curvy (wish I could post a pic) and a nice bum! Also has the most gorgeous brown eyes and tanned skin! id take her any day over a Kardashian!
Colser wrote: » Why don't men fancy Cameron Diaz..I think she'd be my type of I was male but men don't ever seem to mention her?
wakka12 wrote: » http://img2.timeinc.net/people/i/2016/stylewatch/blog/160620/kim-kardashian-600x800.jpg She is definitely at a healthy body fat level there. Look at her fairly slim waist and define jawline. She has extremely exaggerated bone structure and proportions, huge hips boobs shoulders and large frame overall which make her look quite chunky and curvy though
jimgoose wrote: I think she's gorgeous. I would have thought that was a given!
Colser wrote: » But she never gets mentioned anywhere...what about Jamie Lee Curtis?She's very attractive imo..too old?
Musketeer4 wrote: I'd feel the same about, say, Angelina Jolie. I wouldn't find her attractive really.
Musketeer4 wrote: » ...I'd feel the same about, say, Angelina Jolie. I wouldn't find her attractive really.
anna080 wrote: » What about all those Geordie Shore type girls with the big inflated titties and clown make up. Sure they do have fellas hanging off them. I love the look of say, Sienna Miller, natural make up and freckles showing through. Can't stand that caked on crap. On a man I like the physique of Jamie Dornan.
Ush1 wrote: » That's what I mean when I'm on about Kim K/pornstar look. Whether people like to admit it or not a woman with big boobs, narrow waist and a big arse and makeup will get the most attention.
Mr. FoggPatches wrote: » I wouldn't care how good looking she is if she's into that sh*te tbh.
jimgoose wrote: » A lime-coloured Lamborghini Diablo with an orange interior will get plenty of attention too, but you wouldn't necessarily want to drive the thing for a week. :pac:
Ush1 wrote: » Oh I agree, but evolution wise were not setup to be driving things for a week, if ya get my drift!:P
jimgoose wrote: » I am attempting to suggest that putting up with this Essex Tart dawnce around me 'andbag annat innit crap for any length of time would be somewhat akin to trying to commute in the rain in a €300,000 supercar - a great idea on paper, especially if you're fifteen years old, but something very else to actually do. :pac: