nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

2017-21 help to buy scheme - megathread. All help to buy discussion here please

PedroDublin

Hello everyone, what do you think the purchase date mean on the new help to buy scheme? Contracts signed by buyers, contracts received, mortgage withdrawal, closing date..... I have seen different things on different news

Find more posts tagged with

new house

help to buy

first time buyer grant

htb

Quick Links

Comments

sibersha

Question regarding Help to Buy scheme:

Have signed building contract post July 19th and should be drawing down shortly and are receiving an 85% mortgage.

As 1st time buyers of a new build, should we expect a rebate in January 2017 in form of a lump sum? Considering we have collectively paid 5% of the value in PAYE over the last 4 years. Or will it be a tax credits/tax relief?

Thanks

Alter_Ego

sibersha wrote: »

Question regarding Help to Buy scheme:

Have signed building contract post July 19th and should be drawing down shortly and are receiving an 85% mortgage.

As 1st time buyers of a new build, should we expect a rebate in January 2017 in form of a lump sum? Considering we have collectively paid 5% of the value in PAYE over the last 4 years. Or will it be a tax credits/tax relief?

Thanks

It's probably best to contact Revenue with the question

Stheno

hawkeye_bmr wrote: »

We signed on 19th, so just scraping thru, house is down on ppr as new build, but the 4yrs previous PAYE is gonna be the next hurdle I can see..

Having returned home from Oz may 2015 after 3yrs away, we both have only 1 full year of PAYE, around 3k, so I'm assuming that that's all we'd get even tho 5% would be 7k~

Wondering what happens in this situation?

You only get back the tax you've paid

annoyedgal

Probably know the answer already but here it goes. I bought a house before I got married. In my name only. Looking to trade up, could my husband be entitled to the first time buyers grant for new builds if he buys next house in his name only? We would be selling my house to fund the move. Thanks in advance

The_Conductor

Short and simple answer is- no.
Once either of a couple who are buying are not first-time-buyers- the couple as a whole, are not first time buyers.
Sorry.

annoyedgal

Bummer.....thanks!

quote="The_Conductor;101361492"]Short and simple answer is- no.
Once either of a couple who are buying are not first-time-buyers- the couple as a whole, are not first time buyers.
Sorry.[/quote]

caviardreams

annoyedgal wrote: »

Probably know the answer already but here it goes. I bought a house before I got married. In my name only. Looking to trade up, could my husband be entitled to the first time buyers grant for new builds if he buys next house in his name only? We would be selling my house to fund the move. Thanks in advance

Also I am pretty sure if you are married the family home has to be in both names.

Prismatic

Anyone planning to borrow more than needed inorder to avail of the new help to buy scheme?

For example you only need to borrow 60% of the purchase price, but instead borrow 80% plus and pay off a lump sum next year when you receive the grant.

You don't need help from the government but why not take it since they are offering?

yesap

Prismatic wrote: »

Anyone planning to borrow more than needed inorder to avail of the new help to buy scheme?

For example you only need to borrow 60% of the purchase price, but instead borrow 80% plus and pay off a lump sum next year when you receive the grant.

You don't need help from the government but why not take it since they are offering?

Is it not on the value of property rather than value of loan, makes no difference what lump sum you are putting towards it?

Prismatic

yesap wrote: »

Is it not on the value of property rather than value of loan, makes no difference what lump sum you are putting towards it?

That's what I said. Value of property/purchase price. One of the rules is you need to borrow 80% of the price of the property. I'm wondering if many people are borrowing 80% but in reality need less and are borrowing more just to avail of the grant.

If you borrow 75% of the property value you get nothing for example.

If you borrow 80% you get 5% of the value back from the government up to 400k.

Pay off a lump sum from the rest of savings plus government grant and you are in a much better position than just borrowing the 75%.

Ayuntamiento

I suppose you could only do that if you'll still qualify for the larger mortgage required based on the CB's 3.5 times your income rule. I know a lot of couples with modest enough combined salaries (<80k) who are only able to afford Dublin property because they have really large deposits (made up of savings and gifts).

Prismatic

Ayuntamiento wrote: »

I suppose you could only do that if you'll still qualify for the larger mortgage required based on the CB's 3.5 times your income rule. I know a lot of couples with modest enough combined salaries (<80k) who are only able to afford Dublin property because they have really large deposits (made up of savings and gifts).

Or be eligible for an exemption of the 3.5x income rule.

One of the worst aspects of the the new scheme is that the low earners are excluded as their deposits have to exceed 20% as you say.

My question was referring to the other end of the market, people who don't need it and who would not qualify unless they borrow more than they would have otherwise if the 80% rule was not there.

zl1whqvjs75cdy

I see they are tweaking this a bit.

http://www.rte.ie/news/business/2016/1019/825297-measures-expectto-close-vulture-fund-tax-loopholes/

Max 70 % ltv now.

Pedro32561

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/government-to-announce-changes-to-the-firsttime-buyers-scheme-35144774.html

I see that the threshold to qualify is now being lowered to 70% LTV. Good news particularly for those with self builds.

RandomAccess

Lads when are the full details published?

zl1whqvjs75cdy

RandomAccess wrote: »

Lads when are the full details published?

Finance bill tomorrow me thinks. So them.

stickman22

Just read that there is going to be a change to the FTB grant announced tomorrow & the treshold has been reduced to 70% from 80%, this is huge news for us as we are buying a new build due to be ready in the Spring & the max the bank would give us was a 76% mortgage, we were gutted to say the least but this is great news for us.
However does anyone know how you apply for it, I can't find anything online. Hopefully this helps other buyers too.

Joebloggs:37

stickman22 wrote: »

Just read that there is going to be a change to the FTB grant announced tomorrow & the treshold has been reduced to 70% from 80%, this is huge news for us as we are buying a new build due to be ready in the Spring & the max the bank would give us was a 76% mortgage, we were gutted to say the least but this is great news for us.
However does anyone know how you apply for it, I can't find anything online. Hopefully this helps other buyers too.

Hi Stickman, explain the treshold to me in relation to the first time buyers scheme?

Monife

Pedro32561 wrote: »

http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/government-to-announce-changes-to-the-firsttime-buyers-scheme-35144774.html

I see that the threshold to qualify is now being lowered to 70% LTV. Good news particularly for those with self builds.

Not good news at all. That's a complete joke. It's supposed to help people who can't achieve the max 10-20% deposit, this just further helps the people who already have the money for a decent deposit.

athtrasna

Rene Microscopic Igloo wrote: »

Finance bill tomorrow me thinks. So them.

More to be added at committee stage so not even all the info tomorrow. Word is that the top price level may be reduced to 400K with more expensive properties not qualifying

riclad

this means say you are borrowing 70k, house cost is 100k, you,ll still qualify for the ftb grant .
so 70 per cent loans are now covered by the scheme .
70 per cent of house cost .

zl1whqvjs75cdy

So is the swap from 80% to 70% a good thing. Or not?

ixus

CB intervened, they saw it as punishing savers. Average FTB is 78.5% mortgage. Reducing the cap could be interesting. Say cap is at 400k. Does builder or second hand house seller with price at 415k now reduce? Maybe not, but it may result in the 400k cap being a magnet for all house prices in that region.

RandomAccess

donkeyoaty0099 wrote: »

So is the swap from 80% to 70% a good thing. Or not?

Overall its a good thing.
It would be callous to penalise those who had gone the extra mile in saving a deposit. Also encouraging an 80%+ LTV is hardly commendable in the eyes of the central bank.

Monife

RandomAccess wrote: »

Overall its a good thing.
It would be callous to penalise those who had gone the extra mile in saving a deposit. Also encouraging an 80%+ LTV is hardly commendable in the eyes of the central bank.

But it's suppose to help the people who cannot manage to save a large deposit. Now it's a free for all for people who don't even need help.

bleary

No its supposed to help developers build more.
This 80% measure penalised responsible purchasers. Also self builds are still probably ruled out by it.

To be honest if someone can't save a 10% deposit, should they be getting a mortgage? analysis of arrears have shown they are less likely to be able to cope over the course of the mortgage. They will have to deal with a number of things interest rate increases, employment & life changes etc.

Everyone should have to save for a few years before a mortgage, it's part of understanding the commitment you are making.

I know a lot of people who wish they were made do that rather than put themselves through the last ten years

TheUnderfaker

I've had absolutely no social life over the last 2 years because I've saved hard to get my deposit together. Every penny pinched and absolutely no unnecessary purchases. I took out a mortgage on a property just last week on 75% LTV. Surely I can't be penalized for this, while somebody who hasn't bothered their hole to do the hard work and save get's free money from the govt?!

stickman22

Undertaker, that's us too, we have been officially offered a 76% mortgage, we worked so hard to save 60k of a mortgage, we are delighted now that we will be getting a bit of help too

RandomAccess

Monife wrote: »

But it's suppose to help the people who cannot manage to save a large deposit. Now it's a free for all for people who don't even need help.

It's always been a builder grant, they know builders earn greater profits from the less basic houses. It wouldn't succeed in its true goal of incentivising development if it just targeted the lowest earners.

Also more importantly,
If they just targeted the lowest rung it would put people who haven't managed to save on an equal footing as those that have managed to scrimp and save to meet the requirements.

It would be a kick in the face to those who followed the rules and would generate enormous anger and undermine trust in government and the central bank.

TheUnderfaker

It's gonna make all the difference when it comes to actually moving in stickman22. Congrats on the mortgage