Unsurepete wrote: » It's obviously a very silly thing to have fallen out over and as much as I want to make the next move and call her first, I'm not sure her reaction was all that mature and has me questioning a few things. At the same time losing someone potentially special over something so trivial would be a shame. So should I stick to convictions or contact her?
Unsurepete wrote: » I don't really think it's a contradiction. In my eyes it felt like we were in a relationship based on how much time we spent together and just the way we were around each other.
HiGlo wrote: » Let me put this perspective of it to you; She really likes you and is happy with how things are progressing and hoping for more. Then she notices the toiletries and wonders “have I been reading things all wrong? Is this just casual for him? Is he seeing other people??” So, as she gets the kick in the stomach of that potential reality she decides how to address it with you. Not wanting to appear overly keen (esp if she is trying to gauge your level of interest) she brings it up half jokingly… The response she seems to get from you then is vague and non-commital so that affirms (for her) her belief that you’re not genuinely interested in her and she’s hurt and upset and thinking that she’s setting herself up for rejection so she leaves. Her lack of communication here is also causing the problem, but “punishing” her for trying to get a feel for where she stands with you by being non-commital in your response probably wasn’t a good way to go….
Yellow pack crisps wrote: A bigger red flag would be that she arranged a date a few days after asking for exclusitivity!
pookie82 wrote: » To everyone saying she's just as bad for setting up a date herself ... I don't buy this. After a mortified and humiliating few days of realising she'd been both shot down and shut out (for making a jokey enquiry, might I add) I'm sure she thought to herself "f*ck this, wasting time on a guy who won't commit after 2 months, I may as well date someone who does want me."
Again, OP, all I'm seeing in your version of events is contradictions. If, to you, you were all but officially in a relationship anyways ("In my eyes it felt like we were in a relationship based on how much time we spent together and just the way we were around each other"), why oh why did you shut her down when the topic arose? Saying it's because she had the audacity to ask a reasonable question brings us right back to the original problem ... you're not mature enough for a relationship. People in relationships are allowed to ask questions, especially when they pertain to their own emotional or sexual welfare.
LLMMLL wrote: » People in relationships are allowed ask questions but they're not allowed answer them? All he did was say a bit more time was needed before commitment.
SB_Part2 wrote: » And he only said this because he didn't feel like she should be "rewarded".
LLMMLL wrote: » You can make any behaviour seem acceptable/unacceptable by putting it in a certain perspective. For example, she noticed the toiletries and overreacted, rather than assuming it was an exes or family members she becomes suspicious. She doesn't want to look crazy so instead of discussing exclusivity, she makes a passive aggressive joke to try and get the OP to reassure her. The OP doesn't like her attitude so honestly tells her he has not seen anyone else but needs a little longer before committing. She punishes him by ignoring him and setting up another date etc.
twill wrote: » Talk about skewing the narrative. The OP admitted from the first that there was nothing remotely honest about his response. Also you make it about his ex-girlfriend punishing him when he said openly he was punishing her. She did what a person with a healthy self-esteem would do when confronted with this behaviour, which was to disengage. It really angers me when women are slated for standing up for themselves as any healthy human should. It's not her job to cater to his ego. I can only recommend that the OP sincerely apologise and address the issues he mentioned which may skew his idea of relationship dynamics. This incident may be a one-off, but then again it can't do any harm. Whether there is still a chance for the two of you, you never know.
Dial Hard wrote: » Yellow pack crisps wrote: A bigger red flag would be that she arranged a date a few days after asking for exclusitivity! The woman was shot down in flames when she asked for exclusivity. I wouldn't begrudge anyone a date to boost the confidence after that.
LLMMLL wrote: » 1. She doesn't know that so its immaterial to her gameplaying after. 2. She raised the issue because she got fearful. Not a positive atmosphere to have the exclusivity chat in.
Unsurepete wrote: » So I've been dating this girl for about 2 months now, we get on fairly effortlessly, similar outlooks on life and electric sex. First girl in a few years that would make me want to settle down for, because as fun as single life has been, nothing beats feeling a connection on that level. Well at least I thought that until Saturday night, we were having a great time as usual, having a few drinks at my place. She went off to the bathroom and upon exiting she said half jokingly 'so have you had many woman back here recently?' to which I replied with a confused 'sorry?'. Unbeknownst to me there were a couple of female toiletries (spray/conditioner) which my sister had left there earlier in the week. I explained this to her, was probably a little on the curt side as didn't really like the accusational nature of her question, even if she wasn't all that serious. Then for whatever reason she thought this would be a good time to ask me would I like to make our relationship exclusive. I told her that was definitely the direction I had seen us going, and that I haven't dated anyone else since our 2nd date but perhaps we wait another little while longer. It just didn't feel right to me at that time to reward suspicious behaviour like that. Anyway for the first time things got a little awkward after that, she went a bit into herself, almost seemed a bit embarrassed. She made a fairly weak excuse and left shortly after. Neither of us have contacted each other since. It's obviously a very silly thing to have fallen out over and as much as I want to make the next move and call her first, I'm not sure her reaction was all that mature and has me questioning a few things. At the same time losing someone potentially special over something so trivial would be a shame. So should I stick to convictions or contact her?
notjustsweet wrote: » You're seriously projecting both here and in all your other posts. It's only your opinion both that she was game playing and was fearful.
It shouldn't be a big issue when you've been having a sexual relationship with someone to raise the issue of if they are also sleeping with other people. Actually it's smart and health conscious. It's just as likely she also thought the relationship was going somewhere and got a bit of a shock when cosmetics were in his bathroom but it wasn't at all passive aggressive as you claimed. It's what adults do in relationships, they talk and work things out.
The only game playing was from the op who instead of saying the truth ( he wants a relationship) decided not to "reward" her for attempting to communicate and then ignored her.
When everyone in this thread other than you and frostyjacks is in agreement it's pretty likely you're in the minority and perhaps need a rethink?
LLMMLL wrote: » That's completely skewed. You can't ignore someone who doesn't attempt to contact you.
SB_Part2 wrote: » Ah here. If I asked a fella if we were exclusive after 2 months and he said no I'd be absolutely mortified and wouldn't be contacting him either.
forestgirl wrote: » Mod Snipped - below standard required of PI/RI