deadanonymau5 wrote: » Clearly a PR exercise
MrStuffins wrote: » Jaysus, I shouldn't have mentioned the "F" word :pac: Anyway, forgetting about him being famous and more about him being a class act
Swashbuckler wrote: » Bring back John Kavanagh that's what I say. As soon as he popped in here to make a comment, everyone soon stopped talking sh*t.
EagererBeaver wrote: » Yes, everyone thought John would identify then by their arbitrary username and hunt them down.
Swashbuckler wrote: » No, just people tend to stop acting like idiots when someone they respect shows up.
deadanonymau5 wrote: » There's a big difference between him posting a pic with a kid on his social media account and fans posting on theirs.
Depp wrote: » and your point is?
wonderfullife wrote: » precisely. Conor has ample opportunities to show off when he goes to hospitals on his own private time to meet a big fan or when he stops for half an hour to talk MMA to a complete random in a wheelchair or when he signs things for charity etc. Yet he doesn't do it. So in this instance when he actually posts a picture for a girl who didn't have her phone, maybe, just maybe, he did it because the little girl really wanted a picture and didn't have her phone. Not for how it makes him look. Which frankly, he couldn't give a flying fcuk about.
deadanonymau5 wrote: » The point is implied in my post. If your too dim to see it you don't deserve an answer.
deadanonymau5 wrote: » TLDR
JJayoo wrote: » McG takes a few pictures with fans and some fanboys want him declared a saint, I would like to think that 99% of people would take the few seconds to take pictures with fans. In no way am I putting him down, just pointing out how daft some people are in regards to 'defending' McG at every opportunity.
JJayoo wrote: » But no one is actually knocking him, they know how you will react and watch you take the bait. I mean one person posts "PR Stunt" and it's all systems go, it's as bad as man united vs man city fans
EagererBeaver wrote: What people were acting like idiots that speed when Kavanagh showed up? This isn't the dogmatically praise Conor McGregor thread.
hatrickpatrick wrote: » "A year-ish off". I wonder if the "ish" implies more or less than a year? I'd be very surprised if he let an entire calendar year (Jan-Dec) go by without a fight, so I would reckon if this rumour is true, it'll mean that his next fight will be in Autumn/Winter 2017 rather than early 2018. Now here's a question: Suppose he does take a year off and either vacates or is stripped of both belts so as not to hold up a division for that long - when he returns after a hiatus like that, would his record before the break allow him to immediately challenge whoever the current belt holder in either division is, or would he have to work his way up to it by doing some non-title fights first? I don't think he'd particularly mind either way - he's shown a consistent willingness to fight in non title fights when it comes to it, and I'm sure he'd still be making just as much money given he'd probably be an even bigger draw if it was billed as "the triumphant comeback", but I'm just wondering what the rules are in the UFC for this kind of scenario. Can a champion take an extended break of that order, and then come back and fight for titles straight away like the gap never happened?
hatrickpatrick wrote: » t Can a champion take an extended break of that order, and then come back and fight for titles straight away like the gap never happened?
BOHtox wrote: » Can we go back to talking about how big he is in terms of stardom in Ireland?