ArielAtom wrote: » Have you the figures, is the money going to just registered adult footballers? The Spewin MacBull****ter term of financial doping is laughable, you should really drop it or is it you Spewin? If it is just adult football then the figures are being manipulated to suit the hacks argument.If you can link me to the stats that show it is just adult football that is receiving the funding we can debate.
Biloxi Blues wrote: » It's taken from the audited financial statements of the GAA and the registered players per county. Give us a link to prove that all of the Dublin financial doping money is going to children.
PARlance wrote: From an outsider, Dean Rock would get a special mention for me. I still think he needs to improve his kicking range but he has come on leaps and bounds in general play imo. I thought he really stood up the last day. It may be a small thing but seeing him running back to Higgins after he scored from play and letting Higgins "know he was there" was something a bit of a landmark moment in how I viewed him anyway.
PARlance wrote: » From an outsider, Dean Rock would get a special mention for me. I still think he needs to improve his kicking range but he has come on leaps and bounds in general play imo. I thought he really stood up the last day. It may be a small thing but seeing him running back to Higgins after he scored from play and letting Higgins "know he was there" was something a bit of a landmark moment in how I viewed him anyway.
Biloxi Blues wrote: » It's all in the GAA's audited financial statements. Unless you have some reason to believe the audited statements are false and misleading, this is just an attempt at deflection.
Godge wrote: » http://www.irishexaminer.com/sport/gaa/football/we-can-all-take-lessons-from-dublin-winning-blueprint-403728.html It is all about the kids. Don't just take it from me, take it from Mike Quirke. "In this context, Dublin GAA didn’t invest in bricks or mortar, instead hiring nearly 50 Games Promotion Officers at the time, (now Games Development Administrators) to work directly with individual clubs and their primary and secondary feeder schools. " "They provide coach education to mentors, ensuring all have the requisite coaching qualifications to make sure the kids coming in their gate are receiving the best possible GAA experience." "These GDA’s also target all the primary schools feeding those clubs. Here their work focuses more on the kids. The goal, from their hand improve fundamental movement skills, working on children’s bi-lateral co-ordination and ball familiarity. Crucially, it’s about developing a sustainable relationship from a young age between the kids, their primary school, and their club by making sure their first sustained experience of GAA is a positive one." What did Eugene McGee say about it?http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/eugene-mcgee/eugene-mcgee-gaa-can-reap-rewards-of-catching-dubs-blue-wave-26794248.html "It's a brave new world now in Dublin GAA, so they are right to go for it. The GAA as a whole will be better if the 'Blue Wave' really is unleashed." Quite simply, the money is based on a strategic plan to increase juvenile participation rates, which is to the long-term benefit of the GAA. If it went to say Mayo, it would probably feed the short-term ambition of winning an All-Ireland and they would be the next Offaly.
Biloxi Blues wrote: » The last thing you or the rest of the Dubs here want to do is "debate" anything that shows you are receiving unfair financial assistance . It is based on numbers of registered players and games development grants per county - all taken from the GAA audited financial statements. No matter which way you splice it and dice it, attack the messenger, deflect, obfuscate and deny, it all amounts to financial doping. Where is the Dubs proof that it's all going to kids in ghettoes that they seem to be insisting upon?
Nonevernomore wrote: » I didn't think it was the same Dublin posters who post over and over again. I'd be interested in a Dublin supporters point of view on the issue. All I've got so far is people ignoring it and deflecting. Why is that? And if that's all that's ever going to come from bringing that up here then of course I won't be posting about it.
Biloxi Blues wrote: » So the "proof" you have is Quirke, a GDA officer himself so has a vested interest in bigging this thing up. And McGee waffling in an article from 5 years ago about promoting the "Dublin brand" doesn't 'prove' anything either.
Godge wrote: » So wait a minute, you produce a map, with no figures or rationale to back it up, and you criticise two newspaper articles that detail where the money is spent. You are the one who has made the allegation about financial doping and you have produced zero proof, just something something about some student and a thesis. I will just leave it there.
gormdubhgorm wrote: » This is the book you need to read: GAAconomics: The Secret Life of Money in the GAA by Michael Moyinhanhttps://www.amazon.com/GAAconomics-Secret-Life-Money-GAA/dp/071715453X Come back when you have read this it will open your eyes and crush a lot of myths. If you can't buy it it should be available in your local library. There are plenty on the issues that Dublin clubs have, there more smaller clubs that need to be created as large swathes of Dublin are underfunded /GAA wastelands, but yet some areas have 'superclubs' that need to be broken up. It also has other bits on how important a successful Dublin team is for the whole of the GAA considering the amount of money they generate directly/indirectly.
Biloxi Blues wrote: » So no large swathes of GAA wasteland anywhere else but Dublin? Merely naming a book doesn't support anything. If tracts of it ran contrary to what you want to believe in we would be asked, judging by the responses here, to produce every bit of corroboration behind the bits you don't like and then it would be ignored anyway.
kilns wrote: » Instead of people like Biloxi having the usual moan about money, maybe they should look deeper at how Dublin GAA is run and the structures they have in place. GAA by its nature is political and county boards destroy counties with small minded politics, Dublin is one of the least politically run county boards, so they can get on with the real business of promoting the games and providing excellent coaching and getting kids out and active, but some begrudgers will always have issues with this
gormdubhgorm wrote: » Can you tell me if there was uproar when Kerry were going for 5 in a row? (Pre-internet days would take old fashioned research - or an auld fella telling the truth!) They could have won 9 in a row only for Seamus Darby!
gormdubhgorm wrote: » I can't count it was ONLY EIGHT in a row Kerry could have won.
DoctaDee wrote: » Take it was a stand ticket ? Was on The Hill so didn't have a problem - the bottom left of your ticket should show it was issued as a PP ticket holder with your scheme number.
Godge wrote: » http://www.irishtimes.com/sport/gaelic-games/gaelic-football/darragh-%C3%B3-s%C3%A9-being-humble-is-the-bedrock-of-dublin-s-greatness-1.2816282 I only spotted this article from Darragh O'Se this morning. If only others were as gracious in defeat and acknowledged when the better team won. From the first paragraph onwards he gets the tone completely right. It made for great reading this morning.