nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

FE1 Exam Thread (Read 1st post!) NOTICE: YOU MAY SWAP EXAM GRIDS

RandolphEsq

Equity tomorrow. What are people predicting/hoping for with injunctions. I would like some sort of essay on Campus Oil principles and deviation from them or an essay on Anton Piller, Marevas.

Find more posts tagged with

fe1 preparation

fe1's

Quick Links

Comments

20029422

Mileyt wrote: »

How did everyone find company ?

no disposition of assets no restriction no corporate personality and felt in transfer of shares I wrote a lot on part a and nothing in part b and same for 212 question wrote a lot part a made up crap part b.when ya take risks it's the game you play ha

bivo87

Really there is a new examiner. i did not know that. i don't have the last 2 exam papers. Is there any chance you have them? Im covering:
institutions
sources of law/general principles
supremacy/direct effect
Member State Liability
JR
Preliminary Reference
Infringement Proceed
Freedoms
Citizenship
Competition

Leaving out equality, mergers, public liability and state aid and participation. Do you think that is wise? Does the new examiner put on the case note Q?

bivo87

Gunslinger92

Do you guys highlight case names?

Leraf

Do you guys highlight case names? (quotes are not working, for me at least)

The prep course guy told us to highlight case names and legislation for Criminal not so much for the other subjects. I think a lot of it comes down to time though. Better to have legible answers than speed write the perfect answer nobody can read. If there is time to highlight, I will. Just my two cents worth though! Everyone else will have their own style I guess.

20029422

which consumer law is not limited to businesses selling or supplying services as in the man down the street sells me a car what legislation protects me?

Tigerbalm1

Leraf wrote: »

Do you guys highlight case names? (quotes are not working, for me at least)

The prep course guy told us to highlight case names and legislation for Criminal not so much for the other subjects. I think a lot of it comes down to time though. Better to have legible answers than speed write the perfect answer nobody can read. If there is time to highlight, I will. Just my two cents worth though! Everyone else will have their own style I guess.

I think the property examiner wants you to highlight or underline cases (I sat it last sitting so I can't fully remember).

2121993

20029422 wrote: »

no disposition of assets no restriction no corporate personality and felt in transfer of shares I wrote a lot on part a and nothing in part b and same for 212 question wrote a lot part a made up crap part b.when ya take risks it's the game you play ha

You almost gave me a heart attack - there was no part a and b in transfer of shares. If you look at the paper it was just setting out the two different sections of their company constitution. I just answered it as a whole.

I thought the company paper was tough - no SLP or restriction which are usually bankers but I got enough case law down and managed as best I could. Were other peoples' answers quite short?

amomcnico91

Hey guys,

What are people covering for Criminal?

Tigerbalm1

Can anyone tell me what topics came up in the equity exam oct 2015? I have updated an old grid but just realised that I'm missing that.

Also does anyone have any exam reports they can share?

What are people leaving out? I had been very relaxed up until now but I think the fact that they have actually started has kicked me into panic mode

Yohnathan

Does anyone from Independent or Griffith have the predictions for Contract tomorrow please?

XxMCRxBabyxX

Yohnathan wrote: »

Does anyone from Independent or Griffith have the predictions for Contract tomorrow please?

From Independent:

Can't be left out:
Offer & Acceptance
Consideration
Consumer Protection
Remedies
Discharge of a Contract
Mistake
Exemption Clauses

Studied in detail:
Terms
Estoppel
Privity of Contract
Misrepresentation
Duress

hiyakeano

Can anyone explain S45 SOGSSA 1980 and the whole aspect of 'fiction of fraud' in Misrepresentation in Contract law?

I can't seem to get my head around it anymore...

starbar91

Tigerbalm1 wrote: »

Can anyone tell me what topics came up in the equity exam oct 2015? I have updated an old grid but just realised that I'm missing that.

Also does anyone have any exam reports they can share?

What are people leaving out? I had been very relaxed up until now but I think the fact that they have actually started has kicked me into panic mode

PM me your email. Will forward on exam qs and sample answers

legalease2172

Sat what was hopefully my last fe1 today! So long boards.ie ðŸ˜€

laurenburne

Hey anybody have the independent predictions for EU? Or any advice for the case note question? Any likely cases to come up this year? Thanks guys

Lawstudent007

Can anyone who answered Q7 in constitutional today please tell me what the answer consisted of? I answered using property right, no remuniaration for infringement, principles and policy test, fair procedures. I am not sure if that was correct.

legalease2172

Lawstudent007 wrote: »

Can anyone who answered Q7 in constitutional today please tell me what the answer consisted of? I answered using property right, no remuniaration for infringement, principles and policy test, fair procedures. I am not sure if that was correct.

I've no idea what it was about! Avoided it like the plague! Think there was a bit of family thrown in there too!

laurenburne

Anybody have a list of the case notes that came up in EU last time round? I would love you.

Lawstudent007

legalease2172 wrote: »

I've no idea what it was about! Avoided it like the plague! Think there was a bit of family thrown in there too!

Thanks! Over all the paper was ok I thought. Here is to passing! Major session today, with a massive hangover tomorrow!!

Supermax1988

Right so I'm in a bit of a panic because I just realised I forgot to drop in my legislative sources for tomorrow's Contract Exam and it says in the letter it has to be done between 9am and 1pm.

Has anyone here ever dropped in the sources the morning of the exam?

I remember an earlier poster saying they were doing this because they were a two hour drive away?

Dunne1995

Supermax1988 wrote: »

Right so I'm in a bit of a panic because I just realised I forgot to drop in my legislative sources for tomorrow's Contract Exam and it says in the letter it has to be done between 9am and 1pm.

Has anyone here ever dropped in the sources the morning of the exam?

I remember an earlier poster saying they were doing this because they were a two hour drive away?

You can, just won't get them back till about an hour in

Tigerbalm1

Supermax1988 wrote: »

Right so I'm in a bit of a panic because I just realised I forgot to drop in my legislative sources for tomorrow's Contract Exam and it says in the letter it has to be done between 9am and 1pm.

Has anyone here ever dropped in the sources the morning of the exam?

I remember an earlier poster saying they were doing this because they were a two hour drive away?

Normally this is fine, you just get it back during the exam - I haven't done it for this sitting but I have before.

Supermax1988

Dunne1995 wrote: »

You can, just won't get them back till about an hour in

Awh brilliant, thanks. Do you need to phone ahead to the Law Society to let them know or anything?

Tigerbalm1

Supermax1988 wrote: »

Dunne1995 wrote: »

You can, just won't get them back till about an hour in

Awh brilliant, thanks. Do you need to phone ahead to the Law Society to let them know or anything?

No you don't, just hand them in when you get there

ColeJoan

Hi Guys,

To those in the depths of October Fe1 , hope you are doing okay.

Just wanted to ask does anyone have the dates for which spring 2016 exams were sat this year, sat these exams back in 2013/2014 and had a career break for last 2 years, going back to finish unfinished business, ha!.

Just trying to see if I can select 3 exams to sit that wont run back to back based on 2016 spring timetable.(Rang Law Society and dates wont be released until end of November- snore Zzzzz)

Also plus I have always sat Equity, Tort, Contract and Criminal as my first 4 before, failing two, passing two, so now with new rules looking to just smash 3 of these out of the park, most likely Criminal with Contract and Equity as they go hand in hand.

Any remarks greatly appreciated, plus can someone advise me that I should be okay doing these with just the using manuals as I have sat twice before and wondering is there anything new that I should be aware of in the form of Criminal Acts.

bivo87

laurenburne wrote: »

Hey anybody have the independent predictions for EU? Or any advice for the case note question? Any likely cases to come up this year? Thanks guys

laurenburne I'm sitting EU next week too, don't have any predictions but I've only heard that the examiner has changed?? My most recent exam paper that i have is March 2015. Do you know how the examiner has changed things up? are there bankers that weren't there before or visa versa?? :-)

Lawstudent007

Rebelgirl87

Was anyone else pissed off & annoyed with the amount of banging that was going on in the exams or is it just me getting easily annoyed!!! ðŸ˜¡

starbar91

XxMCRxBabyxX wrote: »

From Independent:

Can't be left out:
Offer & Acceptance
Consideration
Consumer Protection
Remedies
Discharge of a Contract
Mistake
Exemption Clauses

Studied in detail:
Terms
Estoppel
Privity of Contract
Misrepresentation
Duress

Would you think I'd be short not having covered Discharge, Privity and Terms??