Winterlong wrote: Close the place down. Open a new sub forum with a clear purpose/identity of what it is and what it wants to be. And let people interact without fear of getting shut down for breaking some nonsensical rule like 'chatting'. We dont need another thunderdome but it's a bit like North Korea in here sometimes.
hannible the cannible wrote: » As long as people can get offended it won't change , a discussion forum should be just that , if you get offended by any thing in any way you should fůck right off
Mister Vain wrote: » Too many pseudo intellectual armchair psychologists and not enough comedians. Or is it the other way around? I don't even know anymore.
Colser wrote: » Take the TTTAY thread as an example...I used to really enjoy it and genuinely laughed every day at some posts,sad as it sounds but I really looked forward to reading it every day but now I definitely think twice before posting and often delete before posting something in case it's ott..
RobbingBandit wrote: » By that you mean the second coming of Ronald Regan. America's best and only choice. The saviour of the 1%. I for one believe in The Donald.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Spot on. The charter should be amended. I propose the following :"If you take offence from anything posted by another poster in After Hours, you will receive a warning from the moderators, and take time out. If you consider yourself vulnerable to the tone of AH hours and that you might take offence, please do not follow this forum. Repeated taking of offence will result in permanent bans from this forum. This is to ensure discussion and debate are not stifled or shut down by offence takers, and that free speech and exchanges of views can take place."
learn_more wrote: » For example there was some vacuous thread I commented on couple of months back where some guy asked 'why are women always textin'. Stupid question required a stupid answer so I said they're not textin , they're just trying to turn their phones on.
The Rape of Lucretia wrote: » Consider that a late thanks.
Deleted User wrote: » I'm very fond of this place but it's a bit safe at times. I hate the whole right wing left wing thing. People have opinions and that's the end of it. Let them be free to air them. Don't want the country being turned in to the Middle East? Then it should be ok to say so. A Donald Trump supporter? Tell us about it. Horrible experiences with travellers? That's ok too. *Find the idea of special transgender toilets silly? I'm all ears. *they are silly. pick one and use it*
Wibbs wrote: » Bring back Terry. Oh and allow pictures FFS. It's 2016, not 1996.
slapper999 wrote: » You can just go and fcuk right off.
Silverfish wrote: » For once I agree with Wibbs. I remember when all this was goatse. And Terry. Lots of Terry. In the nip.
Deleted User wrote: » What's a Terry?
Winterlong wrote: » Know any good Daffodil jokes?
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Except these things are ok to say here. We have thread after thread of people moaning about immigration as a whole and specifically Muslims immigrating. Same with Trump. Where this echo chamber stuff is coming from is beyond me.
superfurry1 wrote: » After hours has turned into a PC newsflash advice thread for shame, i guess it was always going to happen. And this thread wont last very long.
Silverfish wrote: » A Terry is a rare apparition that some say you can still see in front of the spire in the dead of night, and reflecting in the light of the full moon you can see his .... full moon.
Deleted User wrote: » Is it ok for me to say that I think gender neutral clothes and toys for children are completely over the top? Or that some parts of the feminist movement can cause men to become emasculated? That I don't want to live next door to a halting site and the idea of open borders worries me?
ancapailldorcha wrote: » Of course! Why on earth wouldn't it be?
Deleted User wrote: » I don't know *embarrassed face*
Silverfish wrote: » For once I agree with Wibbs.