SmartinMartin wrote: » Interestingly this has a 92 reg.
jake is right wrote: » What about a Reliant van ? That's a Nissan S-Cargo !:p
macplaxton wrote: » Eh? 92-MH-4926?
Silvera wrote: » ^^^ Thats the 'newest-looking' Defender on ZV plates that I have seen
11wingnut wrote: » https://lovindublin.com/news/pic-eight-cars-got-clamped-on-one-dublin-8-street-earlier-today
SmartinMartin wrote: » I'm almost afraid to post this one in the classic thread:D Drumcondra this evening;image hosting no account
RR3.5 wrote: » Wait until somebody has a bad accident in one of those re reg and the ..... hits the fan
Wishbone Ash wrote: » I thought it was above board if the original chassis is used?
unfit2006 wrote: » Correct. Very few of the examples you see have undergone chassis swops. In many cases, it is not possible to do so.
SmartinMartin wrote: » Perfectly legal. General opinion is though that, like the beetles, the revenue will eventually clamp down on them. I'd actually love that one.
Wishbone Ash wrote: » What's the legal standing with those. I thought it was above board if the original chassis is used? A neighbour of mine has a Discovery on the old single letter Z plate (Dublin circa 1971 I think).
SpitfireIV wrote: » Off topic, sorry, but how is your GT6 coming along?