nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

Rangers FC On Field Gossip & Rumour Thread 2017 Mod Note in OP(Updated 14/08)

GavRedKing

Old thread here : http://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2056303530

Play nice everyone.

Mod Post: A reminder to folks that trying to bait supporters by posting alternate names for a football club may lead to a yellow card.

Folk are welcome to post in any superthread they wish to, but nobody is free to use superthreads or this forum in general as somewhere to try and bait/flame/troll other posters.

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Jelle1880

TheCitizen wrote: »

You're beginning to sound like Warbs now.

So no example of other outbursts ?

And here I was thinking you had some proof that Warburton 'couldn't handle the pressure' and therefore has had multiple outbursts ?
Huh, imagine that.

TheCitizen

Jelle1880 wrote: »

So no example of other outbursts ?

And here I was thinking you had some proof that Warburton 'couldn't handle the pressure' and therefore has had multiple outbursts ?
Huh, imagine that.

You didn't actually read what I actually said did you.

Take a deep breath there, count to 10, and try again.

Jelle1880

TheCitizen wrote: »

You didn't actually read what I actually said did you.

Take a deep breath there, count to 10, and try again.

It's fine, you can just admit that you were wrong when you talked about 'his outbursts'. Nobody will hold it against you (well, I might of course bring it up now and again to make fun of you, but all in good spirits of course).

You see, when you type 'outbursts'...
That's plural, meaning there have been more. Which is why I asked you to provide some examples.
Saying there might be more in the future doesn't change that.

So as asked, any other examples for us ? Just so I know what it exactly is that I'm 'used to' (or apparently should be getting used to in the future ?).

Or we can just not even try to compare Warburton's behaviour to that of Lennon, since it's almost as ridiculous as how much attention you spend on Rangers.

TheCitizen

Jelle1880 wrote: »

It's fine, you can just admit that you were wrong when you talked about 'his outbursts'. Nobody will hold it against you.

You see, when you type 'outbursts'...
That's plural, meaning there have been more. Which is why I asked you to provide some examples.
Saying there might be more in the future doesn't change that.

So as asked, any other examples for us ? Just so I know what it exactly is that I'm 'used to' (or apparently should be getting used to in the future ?).

Or we can just not even try to compare Warburton's behaviour to that of Lennon, since it's almost as ridiculous as how much attention you spend on Rangers.

Well if there are more of them then it becomes plural, which is what I said may happen, pedantic pete.

Jelle1880

How exactly does one 'get used' to something that might or might not happen in the future ?

And you're right, I love being pedantic. It's the small things in life, you know.

TheCitizen

Jelle1880 wrote: »

How exactly does one 'get used' to something that might or might not happen in the future ?

And you're right, I love being pedantic if people talk utter nonsense. It's one of the small things I love.

You may have to get used to it by the looks of things with Warbs.

bobmalooka

Jelle1880 wrote: »

How exactly does one 'get used' to something that might or might not happen in the future ?

And you're right, I love being pedantic. It's the small things in life, you know.

Speaking of pedantic, you claimed the decision at Aberdeen cost Rangers 3 points. How's that?

Edit: also I'm happy you're not impressed at the charges being dismissed against Rangers, about time you acknowledged the violent behaviour associated with the club. Big step in the right direction.

weldoninhio

Jelle1880 wrote: »

It's fine, you can just admit that you were wrong when you talked about 'his outbursts'. Nobody will hold it against you (well, I might of course bring it up now and again to make fun of you, but all in good spirits of course).

You see, when you type 'outbursts'...
That's plural, meaning there have been more. Which is why I asked you to provide some examples.
Saying there might be more in the future doesn't change that.

So as asked, any other examples for us ? Just so I know what it exactly is that I'm 'used to' (or apparently should be getting used to in the future ?).

Or we can just not even try to compare Warburton's behaviour to that of Lennon, since it's almost as ridiculous as how much attention you spend on Rangers.

He had an outburst about the "negativity" after the loss in the biggest game of his career so far. He also had an outburst against Aberdeen. He also stomped his feet and stormed out of a press conference as I recall.

Jelle1880

weldoninhio wrote: »

He had an outburst about the "negativity" after the loss in the biggest game of his career so far. He also had an outburst against Aberdeen. He also stomped his feet and stormed out of a press conference as I recall.

Maybe watch it again, at no point did he 'storm out'.

And you must have a very weird idea of what an 'outburst' is if you think that's what he did after the Celtic game.

weldoninhio

Jelle1880 wrote: »

Maybe watch it again, at no point did he 'storm out'.

And you must have a very weird idea of what an 'outburst' is if you think that's what he did after the Celtic game.

He's buckling under the pressure, it's obvious to anyone not wearing blue tinted glasses.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Its Rangers V Partick Thistle today

RANGERS: Foderingham; Tavernier, Senderos, Wilson, Wallace; Halliday, Holt, Kranjcar; Waghorn, Miller, McKay.

SUBS: Gilks, Forrester, Hodson, Dodoo, O’Halloran, Crooks, Kiernan.

Garner is on the bench not Crooks

Broxi_Bear_Eire

1-0 Rangers Kranjcar with a lovely wee bit of skill

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Half time and its 2-0 Rangers halliday with the second

Jelle1880

Possibly the worst I've seen us start for a while, and yet... :pac:

Jelle1880

A supporters bus on the way to the game crashed, 18 people taken to hospital it seems...

Terrible, hope they're all ok.

Berserker

Solid performance from the lads today, so far. Mixing things up very nicely passing wise. Exactly what we needed. We saw the best of Niko too.

Jelle1880 wrote: »

A supporters bus on the way to the game crashed, 18 people taken to hospital it seems...

Terrible, hope they're all ok.

Just read about it on another forum. Hope everyone is ok. Some of the comments on other online media forums about it from supporters of other clubs are nothing short of disgusting. The most important thing is that everyone is ok, of course.

Broxi_Bear_Eire

Sadly one man has died his age was given as 39

Thoughts go out to this poor man and his family.

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-37530736

RoryMac

Terrible news, hopefully the others injured are OK.

Jelle1880

Terrible news, thought to his friends and family

CSF

That is horrible horrible news. Rip to the poor man who died and fingers crossed that everyone else pulls through with minimal injuries.

PauloMN

Just reading the awful news of that crash. Sincere condolences to the family of the man who died and speedy recovery to anyone injured.

We are all football fans and rivalry means nothing at a time like this. RIP.

Berserker

Bear's name has been released. Not going to post it here in case it is against forum rules. He was originally from Larne, it appears.

ActingDanClark

Very sad news

blahfckingblah

RIP to that poor man. Some things are more important than footballing allegiances

Jelle1880

So apparently it seems the medical team at Rangers may have been correct about Lescott after all :pac:

And here I thought it was because he didn't want to move to Glasgow or we couldn't afford him

LiamoSail

I'd still rather Lescott with his detached cartilage at centre half than either of the other pair of geriatrics, Hill or Senderos

Broxi_Bear_Eire

LiamoSail wrote: »

I'd still rather Lescott with his detached cartilage at centre half than either of the other pair of geriatrics, Hill or Senderos

Aye ok then

Coillte_Bhoy

Jelle1880 wrote: »

So apparently it seems the medical team at Rangers may have been correct about Lescott after all :pac:

And here I thought it was because he didn't want to move to Glasgow or we couldn't afford him

Information overload as usual, can you not even provide a link?

Jelle1880

Coillte_Bhoy wrote: »

Information overload as usual, can you not even provide a link?

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Joleon+Lescott

So basically his knee is f*cked because of an underlying issue that was known, just like Rangers said.

weldoninhio

LiamoSail wrote: »

I'd still rather Lescott with his detached cartilage at centre half than either of the other pair of geriatrics, Hill or Senderos

No way, didn't you listen to Warbo, once all of these players who are either British or have already played for British clubs acclimatise to playing in Britain they'll be flying.

Patience required Timmy.