listermint wrote: » I'm personally not sure what lefty government had to do with the crash in 2008 which wiped both by parents funds out to half their value.
Zascar wrote: » So can anyone give any genuine advice as to how much you should have in your pension at a certain age? Are there any guidelines?
McGaggs wrote: » Why so little in equities?
lawred2 wrote: » that's some solid work there
FURET wrote: » 33 years old, around 500k in my pot today, which is self-administered. I get no employer contribution and there is no pension system where I live. If I don't do it for myself no one else will.
PaddyWilliams wrote: » In some instances you may be able to contribute your max amount + employer contributions also. Depends on the scheme rules though. Something you could check out maybe? Just thought it may be of interest to you. 8% employer contribution is very good. I know in my scheme I could put in the 20% + my employers' 5% if I wanted.
aristotle25 wrote: » yeah occupational, 8% employer contribution is about average or a bit above average maybe.
aristotle25 wrote: » 200k in pension fund, 38 years old. Started in 2009 which helped a lot as stock markets have rallied a lot since then. Company pays 8% into pension, I try to max out the remaining 12% allowed to get to 20% max allowed for my age. Not sure when I will retire but not going to rely just on pension, hoping to have a property rented as well.
Geuze wrote: » This isn't a thread about PS pensions, but I can't let this myth go unchallenged. PS pay, and always have paid, 6.5% contribution towards their work pension. Now you can argue it's not enough, and I'd agree with you, but please don't repeat the media myth that PS do not contribute. Since 2009/2010, PS also pay the 10.5% PRD. So PS have been paying up to 17% of wages towards their pension. Again, this thread isn't the place to debate PS pensions.
lawred2 wrote: » were you allowed to do that? mine got locked down