McGaggs wrote: » Fair play for not following the Irish tradition of cashing in the Super when leaving Oz.
Elessar wrote: » Nowhere near as much as I'd like, 10k in it atm and I'm 31. Only started last year. Employer puts in 10% but it's frozen for a few years. If I get paid 100k tomorrow, they'll still only put in 10% of my first wage. Still, I manage about 15% now through employer/employee and AVC contributions. Ideally if I can get to a combined pension of 25-30k by the time I'm 65 I'll be happy. We have a good online tool to help us manage the pension and you can change how it's invested as often as you want. Currently I'm putting 45% of it into equities, which, I hear, are often a better bet long term for growth...
RedXIV wrote: » 25% is definitely better than average. I'm in IT and I thought I was doing well with 7%
freedominacup wrote: » What are the charges? What rate of return are you getting? I constantly hear figures of up to two years contributions disappearing in fees and charges when people take out pensions first. They're not behind the door about charging after this either..
McGaggs wrote: » Why so little in equities?
Elessar wrote: » We have a good online tool to help us manage the pension and you can change how it's invested as often as you want. Currently I'm putting 45% of it into equities, which, I hear, are often a better bet long term for growth...
cookiexx wrote: » My current employer doesn't offer a pension (stupid American start-ups) so I try to keep my private one from previous employer going with annual contributions. It's about 20 percent of my salary currently and I'm 29.
ongarboy wrote: » I have 12 years of a DB scheme accumulated that looks good on paper now but god knows what it will be worth when I retire in the 2040s if it hasn't already been cleaned out. It seems that only public sector employees have truly gold plated non contributory pensions that will not be affected by market influences (compliments of us...the taxpayer).
lawred2 wrote: » were you allowed to do that? mine got locked down
Geuze wrote: » This isn't a thread about PS pensions, but I can't let this myth go unchallenged. PS pay, and always have paid, 6.5% contribution towards their work pension. Now you can argue it's not enough, and I'd agree with you, but please don't repeat the media myth that PS do not contribute. Since 2009/2010, PS also pay the 10.5% PRD. So PS have been paying up to 17% of wages towards their pension. Again, this thread isn't the place to debate PS pensions.
aristotle25 wrote: » 200k in pension fund, 38 years old. Started in 2009 which helped a lot as stock markets have rallied a lot since then. Company pays 8% into pension, I try to max out the remaining 12% allowed to get to 20% max allowed for my age. Not sure when I will retire but not going to rely just on pension, hoping to have a property rented as well.
aristotle25 wrote: » yeah occupational, 8% employer contribution is about average or a bit above average maybe.
PaddyWilliams wrote: » In some instances you may be able to contribute your max amount + employer contributions also. Depends on the scheme rules though. Something you could check out maybe? Just thought it may be of interest to you. 8% employer contribution is very good. I know in my scheme I could put in the 20% + my employers' 5% if I wanted.
FURET wrote: » 33 years old, around 500k in my pot today, which is self-administered. I get no employer contribution and there is no pension system where I live. If I don't do it for myself no one else will.
lawred2 wrote: » that's some solid work there