Grayson wrote: » in other news Obama is American. Who would have thought?
Maximus Alexander wrote: » Make it have really vivid visual and aural hallucinations?
MrVestek wrote: » So... do we have a link to said article then?
Esel wrote: » Fluorine. Try to keep up.
endacl wrote: » Australian fluoride researchers shot Kennedy. But not on the moon? While spraying chemtrails?
Pa994 wrote: » I'd be more worried about our asbestos pipes...
whatdoicare wrote: » So, where do we stand with the rule of "If it's brown drink it down, if it's black send it back"?
Evidence on the cost-effectiveness of water fluoridation was systematically reviewed in 2015. This study found: The annual cost of providing water fluoridation ranged from [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]$[/FONT]0.11 to [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]$[/FONT]4.92 per person for communities with at least 1,000 population. The annual savings ranged from [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]$[/FONT]5.49 to [FONT=Times New Roman, serif]$[/FONT]93.19 per person in avoided costs such as health care savings and avoided days off work.
artanevilla wrote: » I'm more worried about the Dihydrogen Monoxide, there's a much greater quantity than flouride in our drinking water.
Joeytheparrot wrote: » Thats good for you too
gctest50 wrote: » Seems if you flouridate their water the little worker drones need less days off:
SEPT 23 1989 wrote: » Bigfoot shot Kennedy
LeinsterDub wrote: » We damn more asbestos. More asbestos! More asbestos!
Maximus Alexander wrote: » Open your eyes! Have you any idea how many deaths annually are directly attributable to DHMO? It can lead to asphyxiation if inhaled and can be toxic when ingested in large quantities!
Giuliana Gray Ugliness wrote: » 1.5ppm compared to 1.0ppm here. Edit. Now down to 0.6 - 0.7 here.
Call Me Jimmy wrote: » Big pharma
recyclebin wrote: » How come no one mentioned that fluoridated water tastes sheit!!!!