Ziegler1988 wrote: » Anyone going with Jak on wildcard, just be aware that Marshall played a blinder yesterday and most Hull forums say he'll start Saturday
FHFC wrote: » I've seen people going with Jak/Pickford, which while tempting is madness.
Iused2likebusts wrote: » Hopefully jak can get to 4.2 before the inevitable
greedygoblin wrote: » FFFix seems to think not sadly. They're showing him as being >2 days away from a rise.
OneColdHand wrote: » Currently looking at the following: Heaton (Pickford) Valencia - Holebas - Collins (Amat - Kinglsey) Sanchez - Firminio - Antonio - Bolasie (Fletcher) Aguero - Ibra - Deeney Itb: £0.2m Considering going with Lovren over Valencia (Liverpool have 4 of the next 6 at home, while United face Leicester, Liverpool & Chelsea). That would allow me go with Capoue over Fletcher as sub. Anyone have any thoughts?
greedygoblin wrote: » - Townsend. Not entirely certain about keeping him. I think there's goals in Palaces upcoming fixtures, and I wouldn't be surprised to see Spacecraft involved in them. If I can free up the funds elsewhere I think it might be worth upgrading him to Antonio. But having had him from the start and losing 0.2 on him to date I'm reluctant to get rid just yet.
naughtb4 wrote: » Pretty much feel the same about him regarding the Price Fall. Ended up getting rid of him (so far) but would be the one I would down grade to if needing money. Think there is a clear trend towards people going with either High or Low priced Midfield/Forwards and those such as Townsend/Bolassie are being forgotten about
FHFC wrote: » Why Collins? West Ham have been shocking at the back and Collins could be dropped at any minute. Especially with Reid available again this week. I'd be tempted to without a United defender if I was wildcarding. Liverpool defence is tempting but will almost certainly bring pain. I'd look at Baines/Coleman/Williams depending on budget.
OneColdHand wrote: » Tbh, it's mainly fixture based, which I know is a terrible idea. I could go with Lovren + Williams instead of Valencia + Collins. That seems like a better idea alright.
greedygoblin wrote: » I'd be a bit doubtful about Pool defence too. No clean sheets so far and I wouldn't be too confident of a lot of them going forward. Heaton has a few tough fixtures in the next 5 as well. Clean sheets could be few and far between. Lots of save points though you'd imagine.
OneColdHand wrote: » Liverpool played 4 of their first 5 away from home, and have played ARS, SPU, LEI & CHE, all teams capable of scoring. 3 of their next 4 (and 4 of their next 6) is at home, against weaker (on paper) teams. I can see some clean sheets happening. Heaton I've very uncertain about! Could easily change.
greedygoblin wrote: » I suppose it comes down to personal experience regarding Pool defenders. Been stung more than once over the past couple of seasons. I tend to give them a wide berth these days. But as you say they could just as easily go on a good run.
manual_man wrote: » Lads if you're looking at a Liverpool def i'd be more in-Clyne-d to look at Clyne. Has been getting forward alot and his link up play with Mane in particular has been impressive. More expensive than Lovren but worth it for added attacking potential
OneColdHand wrote: » Post thanked simply for the pun! Became a Dad this year, so I feel I have to like jokes like this!
Issac wrote: » Any love for Bellerin? Really nice run after this week. Thinking if putting him in my wc
Thepoet85 wrote: » Anyone help out. Can't decide between: A: Baines and Lovren Or B: Williams and Vertongen Liverpool have the better fixtures but Spurs have been better defensively so far.
Shedite27 wrote: Form over fixtures