nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Child Item

The Shame.....

chillin117

Imagine being nailed for this.......http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/courts/face-of-teenager-who-tried-to-film-fiancees-mother-in-bath-35033914.html

Find more posts tagged with

Quick Links

Comments

Dtp1979

The only person who would complain about the mother reporting is would be the accused...........wait a minute..

bear1

Anyone else suspecting that the teenager that was charged is the same person as learn_more?

Samaris

So, is the wedding still going ahead?

[Deleted User]

Samaris wrote: »

So, is the wedding still going ahead?

I wouldn't give it huge hope.

The whole thing is a little sad, if indeed a family has been torn apart. But there is only one person to blame.

The poor woman must have been mortified, and sick. Her daughter's boyfriend. What a violation of trust and privacy. It was brave of her to go public.

Samaris

Deleted User wrote: »

I wouldn't give it huge hope.

The whole thing is a little sad, if indeed a family has been torn apart. But there is only one person to blame.

The poor woman must have been mortified, and sick. Her daughter's boyfriend. What a violation of trust and privacy. It was brave of her to go public.

I don't think I'd be hoping for it at all!

Although yeah, my post was a bit flippant.

I'd have been raging if I was her.

[Deleted User]

bear1 wrote: »

Anyone else suspecting that the teenager that was charged is the same person as learn_more?

I don't think his point is entirely outrageous.

It possibly isn't pressing news, there was probably more serious sentences handed down in that same court that day that will go unnoticed. But it's always a case that the media will jump all over, it has that titillating aspect, no journo present at Court would allow that one slip by. Again, the person at fault is the offender, he can't control the media's reaction to a case like this.

bear1

Samaris wrote: »

So, is the wedding still going ahead?

Hold on lets ask learn_more

everlast75

McDermotX wrote: »

'District Judge Mark Hamill told the young man "that's how we will protect other victims like this lady in the bath'

I'd like to think he was saying this while whipping out his lightsaber.

"You're all talk Hamill. You never even finished Jedi school!"

Samaris

Deleted User wrote: »

I don't think his point is entirely outrageous.

It possibly isn't pressing news, there was probably more serious sentences handed down in that same court that day that will go unnoticed. But it's always a case that the media will jump all over, it has that titillating aspect, no journo present at Court would allow that one slip by. Again, the person at fault is the offender, he can't control the media's reaction to a case like this.

If his point was "why is the media even caring", sure, I'd agree. But his point appears to be how dare the woman destroy this poor young man's life and put him through all this because she has the brass neck to object to being filmed "secretly" in the bath.

Which is pretty unreasonable.

Senna

Anyone else disappointed there's no picture of the mother in the article?

[Deleted User]

Senna wrote: »

Anyone else disappointed there's no picture of the mother in the article?

I suspect the media was tempted but even they realised that it'd be playing to a certain angle.

Your Face

We'll probably be reading about this fella again in the future.

Widdershins

Revolting

Such an invasion of privacy and a violation, in her own home, by someone who was going to join her family.

5rtytry56

Widdershins wrote: »

.......by someone who was going to join her family.

Please, that things stop here with wedding plans etc. :mad:

Letree

learn_more wrote: »

What an absolute wretch of a woman to report such a trivial incident and have him put though was he has been put through.

Sickening beyond belief.

She's a victim of what. How has she suffered ? Don't make me laugh. What a utter utter b**ch to do what she did.

Are you him... :eek:

fryup

learn_more wrote: »

What an absolute wretch of a woman to report such a trivial incident and have him put though was he has been put through.

Sickening beyond belief.

She's a victim of what. How has she suffered ? Don't make me laugh. What a utter utter b**ch to do what she did.

you gotta be kiddin right??

she's the one gettin perv'ed on and its her fault

*what an apt username, cause you really do need to learn more

timthumbni

theteal wrote: »

Such a weird story. The I read Newtownards and it all made kinda weird sense.

The perv wasn't from newtownards though, he was from Portaferry. Anyway does newtownards have a high number of son in laws who secretly record their mother in laws in the bathroom??

Re the poster earlier trying to pass the blame onto the mother how ridiculous is that? Sounds like the sort who would question what a girl was wearing if she was raped rather than blame the culprit. Pretty low.

As for the marriage still being on I can predict that will end well for all.....

razorblunt

"You're going to court on trial for being a pervert try to act and look norm... oh for fcuk sake"

[Deleted User]

Dtp1979 wrote: »

Jesus it's like he's posing and the cameraman, in an Austin powers voice, shouting " lookmysterious baby, yeah"

I've seen a lot of odd photos being posted accompanying articles recently, especially ones that were just ripped off the internet.

This was the best/worst so far, for a stockbroker link

article

timthumbni

riffmongous wrote: »

I've seen a lot of odd photos being posted accompanying articles recently, especially ones that were just ripped off the internet.

This was the best/worst so far, for a stockbroker link

article

Jaysus, that stockbroker sounds like a character from the fast show. You can just imagine him toasting Satan in that picture.

[Deleted User]

timthumbni wrote: »

Jaysus, that stockbroker sounds like a character from the fast show. You can just imagine him toasting Satan in that picture.

:pac:

Ted111

It's good material for the best man speech.

SEPT 23 1989

riffmongous wrote: »

I've seen a lot of odd photos being posted accompanying articles recently, especially ones that were just ripped off the internet.

This was the best/worst so far, for a stockbroker link

article

its not a court he needed its a stake through the heart

dinorebel

learn_more wrote: »

What an absolute wretch of a woman to report such a trivial incident and have him put though was he has been put through.

Sickening beyond belief.

She's a victim of what. How has she suffered ? Don't make me laugh. What a utter utter b**ch to do what she did.

Thomas is that you?

VisibleGorilla

He should be punished, but is this punishment proportional to the crime he committed? He will suffer the consequences of this for the rest of his life, he is a young man so in effect he has been given a life sentence for his crime.

He is an idiot and should be punished, but a serious criminal conviction, sexual offender and public shaming? Crazy.

Ted111

VisibleGorilla wrote: »

he has been given a life sentence for his crime.

The fact that he has seventeen first names should assist him slipping back in to anonymity.

In years to come this will be just a little in joke between the happy couple and at family get-togethers.

dinorebel

Ted111 wrote: »

The fact that he has seventeen first names should assist him slipping back in to anonymity.

In years to come this will be just a little in joke between the happy couple and at family get-togethers.

At least he has good material for mother-in-law jokes.

[Deleted User]

sugarman wrote: »

As much of a scumbag thing it was to do, I dont agree with his name and photo being released and plastered everywhere. Hes no risk to others...

I dunno. If he could do that to the mother of his own girlfriend, I'd say he could do it again. I'd agree that it doesn't make him a potential rapist or killer or anything, he is what he is, a voyeur, and don't see how we could say with confidence that he wouldn't act on that again.

VisibleGorilla

Deleted User wrote: »

I dunno. If he could do that to the mother of his own girlfriend, I'd say he could do it again. I'd agree that it doesn't make him a potential rapist or killer or anything, he is what he is, a voyeur, and don't see how we could say with confidence that he wouldn't act on that again.

What are the recidivism rates for voyeurism?

Recidivism rates for all sexual crimes are low so I'd assume this would be low as well.

Son Of A Vidic

bear1 wrote: »

Anyone else suspecting that the teenager that was charged is the same person as learn_more?

I'm way past suspecting.