tabbey wrote: » 17 to 20 minutes between Drumcondra and Parkwest certainly seems excessive, probably a fear of the unknown.
Paddico wrote: » Is it me or does anyone else think 35 mins approx to go from Park west to GCD seems very high?
GM228 wrote: » Initially yes, but to be expanded to an all day 7 day service mid/late 2017.
lxflyer wrote: » It is now purely a peak hour service only
loyatemu wrote: » sheff the ref wrote: » It would be possible to have a platform and overhead footbridge solution near the River Liffey crossing to enable people to access Heuston stationhttps://goo.gl/maps/h7UeTed5HVm0 there's already a platform there, the little-used platform 10. It's miles from the station though.
sheff the ref wrote: » It would be possible to have a platform and overhead footbridge solution near the River Liffey crossing to enable people to access Heuston stationhttps://goo.gl/maps/h7UeTed5HVm0
loyatemu wrote: » there's already a platform there, the little-used platform 10. It's miles from the station though.
Thrashssacre wrote: » http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ireland/irish-news/nta-is-designing-bus-corridors-it-cannot-build-chief-says-1.2776300 Starting in october apparently according to this article "Ms Graham also revealed trains on the Kildare line would begin using the Phoenix Park Tunnel in October, to bring services to Connolly Station."
Deleted User wrote: » Correct, the track layout makes it impossible for a train to stop at Heuston and then continue on to Connolly.
spacetweek wrote: » Why's that?
Jamie2k9 wrote: » If it was to happen then Park West would be the best stop to ensure minimal IC time loss, Hazelhatch would lose far more.
tubbs26 wrote: » Is it ever envisaged that intercity services bound for Heuston would stop at Hazelhatch to allow connections to the PPT trains? It would seem like a good idea to me but I'm not sure how feasible it is.
kc56 wrote: » The draft timetable includes a long 2 hour gap from 0710 to 0910 without a direct service from the two busiest, by far, stations - Sallins and Newbridge. Perhaps this draft was seeing what could work within the constraints of the current timetable?
daheff wrote: » They usually change early december (or historically I have seen this). I was just thought as people could already see a timetable that a timetable was already decided!
lxflyer wrote: » Later in the year - that question keeps being asked here. There is no precise date yet.
end of the road wrote: » no, no they won't give it a rest. they are absolutely right to hi-light issues with their rail service and so they should, considering they are paying for it as well. it's the mentality of trying to shut down others who complain that is the reason services aren't as good as they could be, because people don't bother complaining as they get no where so end up with something less then they deserve.
cowboyjoe wrote: » Regarding other lines being left out, please give it a rest.
Infini2 wrote: » 10min timetable is dead for the forseeable future drivers wont agree to it at all in the current climate.