Poxyshamrock wrote: » Where do you work? :eek:
Deleted User wrote: » Walked by there last night. It's amazing to think that the post office was relatively unscathed.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » possibly due to the amount of cleaning chemicals on the premises.
J o e wrote: » I'd say it was helped by the fact that the two buildings aren't actually connected - there's a bit of a gap so you'd have two full external walls to get through.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » Considering it took hold so quickly, it had to be down to the skill of the fire crew? One member interviewed on radio yesterday said, in his 30 years of service he never witnessed any fire to escalate as quickly as that one, possibly due to the amount of cleaning chemicals on the premises.
J o e wrote: » Yeah there is a bit of a gap - they're not directly connected
biko wrote: » You're trying to insinuate something but launderettes are actually quite fire prone. There are even cases of clothes spontaneously combusting because of chemicals/oils on them. So let's leave it for the experts to determine what happened.
bobbyss wrote: » There is a character in a Dickens' novel who spontaneously combusts. But I never heard of clothes combusting. Where are these cases you refer to?
LoonyLovegood wrote: » if they had a computerised system that's potentially gone up in flames too.
bobbyss wrote: » The last 'Great Fire' in the city was the BOI in lower ESquare. Think also McDonagh's had a fire at some stage or other. Could be wrong on both counts. Never heard about their causes though. Anybody know why?
gordongekko wrote: » Typically, fire comes from a chemical reaction between oxygen in the atmosphere and some sort of fuel (wood or gasoline, for example). Of course, wood and gasoline don't spontaneously catch on fire just because they're surrounded by oxygen. For the combustion reaction to happen, you have to heat the fuel to its ignition temperature.
LoonyLovegood wrote: » I hope the staff and owners are alright with everything going on. They'll have insurance, give them a few days to get over everything and organise how it will happen, because with where the fire happened, if they had a computerised system that's potentially gone up in flames too.
_Whimsical_ wrote: » I wonder how insurance works in these instances. What's to stop someone who left in a dress bought in Dunnes in 2010 worth 50 euro saying it was actually bought last year abroad and worth 500 euro? It's not as if everyone will be able to produce purchase receipts for clothing.
Gadgetman496 wrote: » I'm sure the insurance companies are well wide to that lark and have systems in place to cover it. Even before the fire, a lot of the stuff left in there was actually cleaned in Athlone. Can you imagine if someone tried to pull a fast one and the actual garment was produced
seimispook wrote: » I don't really have time to mull over there thread, but have they ruled out any maliciousness?