Smondie wrote: » What's the position on shhoting loose dogs on your land? Is it Legal or not?
paddysdream wrote: » Insurance for dog attacks on sheep is prohibitive.Very very few farmers would have it.Priced it here a few times and even suffering a few doggie related incidents it would be very borderline.It also only covers direct losses and not ewes aborting or subsequent ill thrive due to stress etc. You can claim from the dog owners house policy(assuming you find the culprit and the owners have house insurance)SaveSave
Discodog wrote: » Don't prosecute the owner but shoot the dog. Good old Irish logic.
KungPao wrote: » Dog does what dogs do...shocker. I hope the dog is not killed, but hope the owner gets the book thrown at him. Poor sheep.
Letree wrote: » I think both are required. The owner most definitely needs to be prosecuted but the dog also needs to be put down or shot as it has a taste for blood now.
Since they’ve had the dogs, the number of cougars he’s seen near the goats has gone from six two years ago to one last year to none this year.http://bit.ly/2aNgxCH
sugarman wrote: » On a side note, why does the media always need to round up death tolls in any instance? 36 died according to the article itself, yet headline has 40.
Three neighbours of the farmer in question also had four sheep killed on the same night.
Fabb wrote: » What if we shut down all farms in Ireland?
Mint Aero wrote: » Sorry what's this got to do with the Haely Rae?
smash wrote: » American werewolf in Kerry!
Kovu wrote: » Nobody said the owner wouldn't be prosecuted as well, the easiest way to stop the dog and ensure you catch him in order to check for a microchip is to shoot them. It's also the fastest way to put an immediate stop to the stress suffered by the sheep.
Letree wrote: » If a farmer sees any dog on their land just shoot it.
Discodog wrote: » The owners are very rarely prosecuted because they deliberately don't tag or microchip their dog. I agree that, if an attack is in progress, then shooting the dog is the only option. But after the attack it's pointless & is just a reaction to the "tasted blood" crowd. It's just revenge on a dog that was unfortunate to have an irresponsible owner. The owner could probably identified but no one is going to make that degree of effort.
Chinasea wrote: » I don't see stray dogs roaming round in Kerry. At least not in rural areas. I am not so sure this was carried out by a dog. I know a vet apparently said that the teeth marks matched that of a dog. Not sure how true this is at all.
Discodog wrote: » But after the attack it's pointless & is just a reaction to the "tasted blood" crowd. It's just revenge on a dog that was unfortunate to have an irresponsible owner.
Decuc500 wrote: » Especially Chihuahuas. Those guys are lethal.