cdaly_ wrote: » Used on steady mode it's not blinding unless you stare into it. Its random mode is pretty good at drawing the eye too.
cdaly_ wrote: » Also check out the rear carrier mount. Essential if you have a carrier...
Chuchote wrote: » Did you get it in Amazon or is it available here, if you don't mind my asking? (I mean the Smart Lunar, not the dynamo; my dynamo days left me, along with my dynamism.) Hmm, though it's described as 'blinding'. I don't really want a blindingly bright light, wouldn't think it safe for drivers? The ideal would be a bright light, easily seen from back and side, and preferably (if not too dear) those ones that are standard in Japan that respond automatically to darkening to turn on at night, and that turn off automatically if your bike is still for more than 30 seconds or so.
Chuchote wrote: » A coach in the sense of Bianconi or Trappatoni?
cdaly_ wrote: » I'm all for rechargeable AA/AAA batteries and a charger. Can carry spares on a long spin and can replace worn out batteries with a new set. My spare rear light is a Smart Lunar R2 (non usb). My main rear light is a dynamo light which never needs batteries. Large-ish initial investment what with dynamo wheel and all but well worth it...
Chuchote wrote: » Hmm. Hadn't thought that there might be a variation in how long the charge holds.
Wishbone Ash wrote: » Well played Chuchote! I think it was lost on LD. I spotted a seriously impressive rear light this evening in Dublin city centre (and I don't impress easily!). I asked the cyclist what brand it was. He said it a was from Giant in their shop on the Long Mile Rd. USB rechargeable although he said it only lasted about 3 hrs (so no good for me) but the bees knees for urban commuting.
Wishbone Ash wrote: » Well played Chuchote! I think it was lost on LD.
Lusk_Doyle wrote: » It's your money!
Lusk_Doyle wrote: » I'd say that you probably need both a power meter amd a coach to be sure.
Chuchote wrote: » Hah. Have just taken the velcro off my battenburg-cake hi-viz because it was eating up all my blouses; the hooky part is still hooky but the woolly part has gone all stringy and no longer clings. I'm about to sew on poppers to replace the velcro. Talking of things that don't stick, I'm going to need to replace my back light, which seems to have fallen off. It was a USB rechargeable one, which I liked; would yiz recommend the same, and at what power? Any nice lights out there? I liked this one because it was quite bright but also small.
magicbastarder wrote: » just attach some stickyback velcro to the saddle, problem solved.
Wishbone Ash wrote: » Now that's a new euphemism to me!
LollipopJimmy wrote: » .... popping my cassette in the dishwasher
Lusk_Doyle wrote: » Probably along the lines of "Sure, it could hardly happen again so soon, could it?"
Unknown Soldier wrote: » I was born 10 months after my older('ist) brother... I can imagine how the conversation went on the night I was conceived.
Chuchote wrote: » If I'm cycling any distance (in my terms, not those of most people here), I find myself constantly shifting my arse back on the saddle. I'm not sure if I'm shifting back to get to the wider, more comfy bit, or to give my legs a little bit of a stretch. Do I need to move the saddle forward or backward (if either is possible)?
Unknown Soldier wrote: »
Lusk_Doyle wrote: » For the record, and as you well know, I'm not from Lusk (thankfully)!!!
LollipopJimmy wrote: » A 'Rush Baby' *Shudder*
Wishbone Ash wrote: » She was Latvian! :D
LollipopJimmy wrote: » ... I told ya earlier, Rush is full of odd people :pac:
Wishbone Ash wrote: » AFAIK we don't - the regulations are geared towards the requirements for the learner and I don't think there is any stipulations for non-learners driving the same vehicle. I'm open to correction. She returned on her own looking very frightened. I presume she panicked at the time.
magicbastarder wrote: » i wouldn't see it as a big issue really (having made the mistake myself) - it's not as if it creates extra danger on the roads.
Wishbone Ash wrote: » AFAIK we don't - the regulations are geared towards the requirements for the learner and I don't think there is any stipulations for non-learners driving the same vehicle. I'm open to correction.
LollipopJimmy wrote: » I was under the impression that we already had that regulation?
LollipopJimmy wrote: Your incident sounds awful, did she return with a fully licenced driver?