Falcon L wrote: » That would make sense alright. The D standing for dangerous.
ED E wrote: » It would more likely be Damaged or another word, if they marked them as Dangerous and one were to fail(quite common) and cause injury/damage to a third party they'd leave themselves open to litigation.
greenhorn22 wrote: » I am about to wire my house with cat6 and was wondering what way eir connect ftth to your house. Does it terminate to a new box beside the main phone line box coming in and there to your router? What router do they use? and if i went with Siro, what set up entry point do they use? tks
daraghwal wrote: » Here is the eir setup anyway.
daraghwal wrote: » To be honest, I'd say it's just grades ABCD where D means they need to be replaced within a certain length of time. In my area they came around and put A, B C or D on the poles. The ones with D were replaced very quickly. I doubt they have a special word for A B C etc.
Machinehead wrote: » AFIK poles with 'D' plates are designated for replacement along with the FTTH rollout. I have one right next to my house & when the guy from Eir was around a few months ago he said that all poles were being checked along with the rollout. The pole near me had a large crack running almost half it's length & had the 'D' plate attached denoting that it needs replacing. He went on to say that rolling out the new FTTH on week or damaged poles would be stupid as the fibre cable is much heavier & that Eir are taking this opportunity to check the entire network for any damage.
Allison Puny Appetite wrote: » Gonzo do all the poles in your area with overhead drops have D plates?
yfaykya wrote: » Hey - how would I (if possible!) find out whether FTTH will actually be available on the upside down L shaped road to the left of the exchange (green dot) in the image attached? My house is before the turn on that road and I currently get 24Mb. Thanks!
TMR1_E01 Fibre Broadband Cabinet is Live
yfaykya wrote: » Hmm.. I thought they had to provide 30Mb at least? Maybe they will turn on vectoring to try and get that. Also the whole road is ducted so it would be so easy to drag the fibre down it.
guil wrote: » NBP is 30 minimum.
yfaykya wrote: » Exactly. I am only getting 24Mb in a blue area. Hence my query.
guil wrote: » You're not in a blue area, you're close to it. I doubt there will be anything about minimum speeds until the NBP is finished or at least well underway. All this is for another thread really as it's not FTTH.
Dero wrote: » So, I live in in an NBP intervention area, but it seems that our local exchange is part of the initial rollout of FTTH (Curragh Camp, Kildare). However, none of the blue lines touch my road. I suppose my question is a hybrid of an NBP/FTTH one in that I'm wondering if Eir win the NBP contract, what are the chances of the already FTTH exchange areas being expanded first? I realise it's years away in either case anyway, but still. It's a bit depressing seeing the exchange name on the initial list, but knowing the magic blue lines come nowhere near me. It's selfish I know, but I'm hoping that those areas around FTTH-enabled exchanges would represent "low-hanging fruit" to Eir in an NBP context.
Gonzo wrote: » your too close to the exchange for the blue rural line scheme. Even blue lines drawn through the center of towns may not get the FTTH for many years.
JohnC. wrote: » Is there a definition, even loose, for too close? Is approx 750m likely safe?
damienirel wrote: » Just wondering is anything happening out there? 100k houses connected by march 2017 seems wildly ambitious now in August 2016 7 months to get all of that done? Nothing new if another deadline is missed by the incumbent operator.
daraghwal wrote: » 100K houses that have access to it. Not connected. Just with fibre available to them if they want it I presume. There might not be near 100,000 taking up on the offer by March. There appears to be a bit of prep work being done already just not many houses connected (if any yet).
damienirel wrote: » By having "access" I'd assume it would need to be available for connection if the person residing in the property that has "access" decides to get a connection? In that case it still appears to be massively ambitious to the point of calling bullsh1t on it.
marno21 wrote: » They are finishing the FTTC rollout first (or most of it anyway). That has been their no 1 priority, and it's almost done