fryup wrote: » .....whats Nandos like ?? tasty ? better than KFC ?
Ciaran_B wrote: » It's a bit cheeky.
blue note wrote: » Where are these better cheaper places? I know of the places that are worse but cheaper like KFC, McDonald's, etc. I know of similar priced places that aren't as good like Eddie rockettes, Milano's and the like. But what places are nicer and cheaper? Or even as nice and cheaper? I agree that nandos is very simple - it's just nicely marinated and nicely cooked chicken. But not many places just do something simple and do it well. I've often paid the same in a pub for a mediocre burger and chips or fish and chips or whatever.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » It's pretty **** to be honest OP. Fast food dressed up as restaurant food. Same ****ty chicken used by the likes of supermacs and KFC but grilled instead of fried and with a pretty basic periperi marinade instead of being dredged in flour. Give me good fried chicken over it any time. Crackbird or hillbillys are better, find a Korean place that does Korean fried chicken and you'll never think about nandos again.
fullstop wrote: » There's absolutely nothing wrong with the chicken used in KFC or Supermacs. KFC is delivered fresh and coated in store every day, which is more than can be said for any of their competitors, and exactly the same as would be done in the likes of Crackbird (which is vastly overrated for what it is). I don't eat there, but can't understand why people believe any aul ****e they read about them.
Subcomandante Marcos wrote: » It's terrible, factory farmed, hormone pumped crap chicken.