Itssoeasy wrote: » WTF is mantaur doing ? I hope luger and the bulldog got extra money for having to deal with this talent.
DEFTLEFTHAND wrote: » WWE wrestlers showing lack of ring awareness. Guy's getting pinned with a part of their body under the bottom rope, that's a ropebreak.These new referees don't seem to react to it though? It's up to the wrestler more than anything, hook a leg or roll him back for god's sake. Create some believability in the product.
jaykhunter wrote: » This is one of my biggest pet peeves, that WWE isn't booked like a sporting contest. Sure it has wacky characters and it's very polite of wrestlers to wait until Monday or Thursday to settle their differences but it should follow it's own internal logic. WWE has incredible workrate but it's also so lazy in this respect.
Nerdkiller1991 wrote: » Tuesday...it's-it's Tuesday now.
CastorTroy wrote: » Yeah I remember all those videos about individual wrestlers. Really got to like that song because of them. Speaking of songs, that Kygo/Kodaline song, Raging, always reminds me of Enzo and Cass because of a bit at the beginning where they sing "I know you hate it and I hate it" and all I hear is "Coupla haters. Coupla haters" And another thought is are the commentators pronouncing Sami's kick wrong? Saw the name of it the first time on the draft show and it's called Helluva Kick. When I read that I would read it as "Hell of a kick" and not "Helloova kick"
leggo wrote: » Think that's the joke, he's trying to make it sound exotic but it's just a JR-ism ultimately. At least that's how I took the meaning, maybe someone with more in-depth Zayn knowledge would be able to enlighten if there's more to it?
An File wrote: » leggo wrote: » Think that's the joke, he's trying to make it sound exotic but it's just a JR-ism ultimately. At least that's how I took the meaning, maybe someone with more in-depth Zayn knowledge would be able to enlighten if there's more to it? Either that or "hell" is too much of a curse word for a face to use in some parts of the States.
Omackeral wrote: » I know the top of the women's division isn't about looks but just thinking to myself that I dunno if I find Sasha really really hot or really really odd looking. Sometimes I see her and think 'cracker' and others I'm like ehm maybe not. Anybody else get this?
Palo Alto wrote: » Awful post. You must have the IQ of Ryback.
Itssoeasy wrote: » Is Kevin Dunn posting on boards now ? Horrible bloody attitude to have.
Bounty Hunter wrote: » attack the post not the poster. If you insult another posters intelligence again I will have to act with my mod hat on and not just warn you. Personally I have no issue with someone commenting on a Divas level of attractiveness (if done in a proper manner and not a caveman-esque way) in a random thought thread. He did state that the womens division isn't about looks either. That said I would assume he would have gotten a better response to such a comment in the "non in ring talent related divas thread" I don't particularly find her as hot as some others seem to for example but yeah her attractiveness does not really factor into her ability in the ring or on the mic and I am a fan of hers. I think she is who the WWE will pick to win at Mania and then she will feud 1on1 with Charlotte even though Becky has been great in her role.
Omackeral wrote: » Kindly get a grip. I said explicitly I know that the division isn't about looks in the very first sentence oft post, re-read it. As for the other poster insulting my intelligence, way to miss the point. I made a random observation that sometimes I think someone looks attractive and sometimes not. It was a passing random thought. Said nothing about anything else and certainly don't have a "horrible bloody attitude". I'm delighted Banks, Lynch and Charlotte are where they are and are in a marquee match at Mania. All are great workers.
A Brad Maddox Guy wrote: » Two ridiculous responses to a fairly innocuous post. It's not as if Omack said "sack her for not being hot enough" or "bring back Ashley Massaro and lets have a Bra & Panties jelly fight at Mania".
Pentecost wrote: » Yep I have no problem with Omackeral's post. It was a random thought. Personally I think she is very hot but I can see what he means.
LeeJM wrote: » Becky, Bayley, Sasha, Charlotte is the correct order
LeeJM wrote: » I dont think WWE employ any ugly/non attractive female talent. I may not be attracted to every single one but Im sure somebody out there is. Tamina does nothing for me, Im sure she still has 1000s drooling over her. IMO Dana Brooke looks absolutely ridiculous with her new enhanced chest, but Im sure 1000s are drooling over her. Noelle Foley, I just dont see the attraction at all but yet she has 1000s drooling over her including one of our own here on PWBoards My point is I have no problem with anybody making a statement like AC did above. We all have different tastes. Its a discussion board where we discuss topics such as the above. In closing, Sasha is a riode :pac::pac: