Your Face wrote: » I like different things.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Also, why should the most 'liked' comment be top?
Earthhorse wrote: » Why should the first comment by top? Often it makes no sense when a better answer to the questions asked or topic raised can be found deep in the thread (or not found because of that).
curiousoranje wrote: » Hiding away useful forums and replacing them with useless 'talk to ' forums where every thread consists of a question and a reply of "pm us" or hypocritically selling out to gearbest. Madness.
Selena Zealous Sticker wrote: » But better is subjective in most discussions. You're putting a lot of faith in a bunch of anonymous users to pick what you read for you if you stick with this layout. I just can't see the appeal
Reddit and boards are different and I use them in different ways but if I had to drop using them I'd miss Reddit more.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Why does it 'make no sense' though?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Reddit threads are discussions at the end of the day and so how can you follow a discussion when the replies are sorted by popularity?
Outlaw Pete wrote: » It's also a self fulfilling prophecy in many ways as posts being displayed first will see that they remains so, given that they will undoubtedly get a disproportionate amount of likes based on their positioning alone. Posts seen more.. will be liked more.
Wibbs wrote: » Good luck with that T. Nobody's listening. Oh sure, every so often one of the staff will make a pronouncement that they're listening, but nothing changes, or very rarely, so it's mostly platitudes. They're still pushing the utterly stupid "responsive site", the only allowance to the mass WTF over it was to keep the legacy site going for a little longer. The category rejig which killed the site stone dead is still in play unless you go back to the old legacy. Looking at the site now, it comes across as a knock off donedeal, a turnkey help desk system for Irish business(which doesn't like complaints) and a "topics" menu. Go back to the legacy layout and be shocked how big the site actually is. Or was.
_Tombstone_ wrote: » Looky here, I feel like partying!!!!
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Can you imagine how that would go down on Boards, if threads were sorted by 'most liked' by default? Some of the biggest load of tripe ever posted on Boards (no offense Boards) has received a ton of thanks here. Also, discussions can start off with a lot of comments getting well thanked but ultimately the user will be shown to be incorrect within a few hours (sometimes a few days).
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Also, you ignored by point that often top posts on Reddit will be referencing other posts that have not been liked and so how the hell can any user know if what is being said in the well liked post is true or not. I have often been on reddit and then had to go hunting for posts which I had read being referenced in those top posts. Highly irritating. Discussions should flow and be read as they take place. It's really not a good reflection on today's society that people only want to see what the consensus says is good. Fcuk the consensus.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » Why does it 'make no sense' though? Reddit threads are discussions at the end of the day and so how can you follow a discussion when the replies are sorted by popularity? I get that it would be interesting to see which replies people liked best (and I think Boards should make it easier to do that here) but I just don't see why they should be sorted that way by default. It's also a self fulfilling prophecy in many ways as posts being displayed first will see that they remains so, given that they will undoubtedly get a disproportionate amount of likes based on their positioning alone. Posts seen more.. will be liked more.
Outlaw Pete wrote: » I like both also. Both have their pluses and minuses for sure.
intheclouds wrote: » What's "RES extension"?
Liam Unimportant Jazz wrote: » That drives me mad, if the majority of responses are "pm us" they may as well just stick to emails. .
Earthhorse wrote: » It makes as much sense as ordering it chronologically. .
Guy:Incognito wrote: » You could always stick your account details on a public forum and see how you get on with that......
The punchline of a joke would probably prove the most popular part. You wouldnt want to read it first though.
[Deleted User] wrote: » Thinly veiled "boards is crap, it used to be better, blaa blaa, mods, blaa blaa, I remember when, blaa blaa" thread.
Notorious wrote: » It's true though. Well maybe not that part about it being better. Never liked the small community feel that was prevalent when I was a regular boards user. All the mods and the users with a high post count knew each other, met up regularly, and had their own secret groups on boards. If you spoke out against the clique, you'd face the wrath of the ban hammer.
[Deleted User] wrote: » One of the reasons I like boards is because of the sense of community I get here... However I agree that there is a strong cliquey thing between certain mods and users. Then there was the bizarre love in that has occurred a few times for an ex mod. That's all a bit strange.
Notorious wrote: » I can understand that. I know a friend of mine is big into athletics, and they've supposedly an excellent community here. I should point out that I haven't been a regular user here in 5/6 years, so things might have changed since then. I do remember stories about love triangles though. Always hilarious stuff!
Deleted User wrote: » Thinly veiled "boards is crap, it used to be better, blaa blaa, mods, blaa blaa, I remember when, blaa blaa" thread.