walshyn93 wrote: » I have no idea. I asked for an example within the last 3 years because I'm familiar with most of the famous shootings and know all the evidence. I'm expected to take these radio hosts words as gospel? Nah. More recent examples please.
beach_walker wrote: » Oh I think you can. 1 - (What I asked) Do BLM have some responsibility for this? What do you think? 2 - Are the American police trigger happy? Yes, no doubt. Unlike some posters here, I don't think the answer to 2 is to shoot the police or encourage people to do so. But that's just me.
walshyn93 wrote: » The fact that the phrase "All lives matter" is more offensive to BLM supporters than "**** the police" tells you all you need to know. And the fact that that will continue to be the case in light of these events will be the perfect exposition of these angsty fatherless sociopaths.
Imagine that you’re sitting down to dinner with your family, and while everyone else gets a serving of the meal, you don’t get any. So you say “I should get my fair share.” And as a direct response to this, your dad corrects you, saying, “everyone should get their fair share.” Now, that’s a wonderful sentiment — indeed, everyone should, and that was kinda your point in the first place: that you should be a part of everyone, and you should get your fair share also. However, dad’s smart-ass comment just dismissed you and didn’t solve the problem that you still haven’t gotten any!
walshyn93 wrote: » You're finding it hard to answer a simple question, friend.
RustyNut wrote: » In what post did you ask for examples within a timeframe?
super_furry wrote: » I wasn't asked any question, friend. I'm just stating facts - if you want to have a discussion about Black Lives Matter, you can't have one in isolation. If you're going to talk about them as a group, you have to talk about whey they exist.
Gatling wrote: » Didn't NWA the hip hop group say similar stuff back in the 90s .funny that some of them did quite well for themselves . No Mass shooting Leo's either here we have a single incident and BLM is to blame
Lyaiera wrote: » This was posted elsewhere.
20Cent wrote: » All lives matter is designed to dilute the message black lives matter. It's like complaining that the Irish cancer society don't collect money for all diseases. They have a legitimate complain
walshyn93 wrote: » The question should not be are American police trigger happy, because that's subjective and we have no good basis for comparison.
Gatling wrote: » beach_walker wrote: » Wait a minute, let's stick to BLM. The goal posts can be moved afterwards. Do you think they and their rhetoric about cop killers/killing, racial hatred and anti-police sentiment had anything to do with this? I mean the killer most certainly did think so. Will things change in america - No
beach_walker wrote: » Wait a minute, let's stick to BLM. The goal posts can be moved afterwards. Do you think they and their rhetoric about cop killers/killing, racial hatred and anti-police sentiment had anything to do with this? I mean the killer most certainly did think so.
Junkyard Tom wrote: » It's a fairly gloomy situation. The police will understandably be very jumpy so risk shooting more people. The cops shooting people could elicit further reprisals which will make the cops even more nervous... and so on, and so on. I hope to goodness it all calms down and nobody else gets hurt.
Gatling wrote: » In 2013, Russell Rios shot and killed by Sgt Jason Blackwelde in texas and subsequently found guilty of making false statements and manslaughter. New Mexico, 2 have been charged with first degree murder after shooting a homeless man in the hills behind the city as he appeared to surrender ( video was hard to watch after posted on here ) Last September, Jonathan Ferrell, 24, a former college football player, was shot by Officer Randall Kerrick as he attempted to get help after being involved a car crash late at night inCharlotte, North Carolina. A woman alarmed by Farrell knocking and yelling at her door at two o'clock in the morning called police. By the time Mr Kerrick had arrived, Ferrell had walked away, looking for help elsewhere. What happened next is disputed, but it ended with Mr Kerrick shooting at the 24-year-old 12 times, 10 of the shots hitting Ferrell. Mr Kerrick's own police department said the shooting was "excessive" and said he "did not have a lawful right to discharge his weapon" during the incident. Prosecutors brought the case to a grand jury, and when they did not charge Kerrick, the state argued the jury had not had enough people and convened a second grand jury, which did indict. (Due to face trial this year )
mynamejeff wrote: » in Chicago it didnt work like that, Cops were lees inclined to engage with people in the black areas of the city resulting in less active policing and a hige increase in murdershttp://heyjackass.com/ Its more politically acceptable for politicians to allow black communities to exterminate themselves than to allow the police to tackle the criminality in those communities. Police are now understandably less inclined to draw the label of racism just or doing for their jobs. cant say blame them .
beans wrote: » Well then what's the fukcing point?
beach_walker wrote: » What do you think BLM marches mean when they chant"What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!"
walshyn93 wrote: » "Do you think they and their rhetoric about cop killers/killing, racial hatred and anti-police sentiment had anything to do with this?" Someone else asked you this
Gatling wrote: » Sources are claiming the shooter used a near 70 year old russian made sks rifle and a pistol in the shooting . Not exactly a go to weapon if your planning a mass shooting considering the multitude of options firearms readily available in the US
walshyn93 wrote: » Could be some old Black Panthers gear. A new sniper rifle would be fairly pricey anyway.
Gatling wrote: » Highly doubt that. A decent semi auto and scope state side can be bought a few hundred dollars
walshyn93 wrote: » A run of the mill AR15 might be cheap, but if you want a heavy calibre it's going to cost you.
Gatling wrote: » You don't need heavy calibre in the majority of mass shootings in america in the last few decades pistols and shotguns have been the choice of most shooters along with various stoner design semi automatics. You rarely see heavy calibre been used in crimes like mass shootings
beach_walker wrote: » Well... I mean the shooter did cite BLM. Or do you know his motivations better than he does (did)? What do you think BLM marches mean when they chant"What do we want? Dead cops! When do we want it? Now!"
walshyn93 wrote: » This wasn't your average mass shooting. This was a sniper so he would need a high caliber to be lethal at long distances. As it turns out, he was.