That_Guy wrote: » What time is the 202 press conference due to start at lads?
Karma25 wrote: » 7.30 pm live steaming on their youtube channel.
That_Guy wrote: » Is that BST or local time in Vegas? Just saw it's on at 7:30pm our time. Cheers pal.
JoeyJJ wrote: » Wouldn't be surprised if Conor keeps us waiting as usual
JoeyJJ wrote: » Two ****ing premadonnas
jimmii wrote: » Had to miss it. Any highlights? Guessing it was pretty dull given nothing was posted!
jones 19 wrote: » Terrible press conference, zero banter between the 2 unfortunately.
Tommy Kelly wrote: » At least the 'can't stand McGregor cause of all his s**t talk' crew will be quite now. Maybe what we saw yesterday is the new McGregor. He's going to boring now too.
raze_them_all_ wrote: » What can he say?? He nate your fat skinny?? Nate will just go, fat skinny tapped you Nate I'll knock your head off?? Nate will just go, You tried that, I punched you into being a wrestler? Conor hasn a leg to stand on wehen he's **** talking this time round
paulieeye wrote: » maybe he's a better trash talk than you
pone2012 wrote: » They are professional fighters not circus clowns
CatFromHue wrote: » McGregor seemed to be trash talking Dana and the UFC, not Nate
CatFromHue wrote: » Hard to know what Dana could do, getting into an argument with McGregor at the press conference wouldn't be a good look.
slicus ricus wrote: » The audio quality was terrible and Nate clearly couldn't hear anything over the PA, which was strange because Conor seemed to be able to hear all of the questions. Point is, it's hard to engage in banter when you can't hear what the other lad is saying. Bit of a shame because they had some good aul banter before the previous fight.
Cathy.C wrote: » For me the best thing was that he finally got to say things which should shut the mouths of the fools once and for all that were saying that he didn't attend the Vegas presser cause he was scared and he also said more than enough to quieten the nonsense suggesting he should have his belt taken from him.
slicus ricus wrote: » I thought so as well. I presume you are talking about the part where he spoke about wanting to be with his team mates in the aftermath of the death of Joao Carvalho and how witnessing that event affected him at that time, particularly given that a team mate and close friend was involved. Certainly an admirable and very human response to such tragic events.