Bob24 wrote: » "World's greatest girlfriend treks through flooded street with boyfriend on her back to save his leather shoes" - http://shanghaiist.com/2016/07/07/girlfriend_carries_boyfriend_across_flooded_street.php Does equality between men and women justify having whoever is wearing the cheapest shoes carry the other one on its back to save the shoes from flooding, regardless of gender?
smash wrote: » This is China. Where women are 2nd class citizens. She's not a great girlfriend, she was probably just doing what she was told.
seamus wrote: » Does it have to be either? Can it not just be a case that a girl decided to carry her boyfriend across a flood? Why does it have to "be" something? In terms of why he just didn't take his shoes off, it would be incredibly silly to walk across a flooded street in your bare feet. I wouldn't be that precious about a pair of shoes myself, but whatever.
cowboyBuilder wrote: » but seriously, he should have just taken off his shoes ..
Bob24 wrote: » Depends when :-)http://shanghaiist.com/attachments/jamesgriffiths/gz-subway-sit.jpg
Nicolas Cage wrote: » I keep singing the thread title to the tune of the bohemian rhapsody intro in my head, but can't quite get the number of syllables to match up.
Renegade Mechanic wrote: » It this equal rights? Is it misogyny? Caught in a safe space No sign of reality!
Nicolas Cage wrote: » Take off your shoes, Walk through the water yourself and seeeeeee