Samaris wrote: » Jesus, that's appalling.
Easca Peasca wrote: » 125 people, incredible.
The term "Islamic State" was objected to by Muslim groups in Europe. In Britain, members of the Islamic Society of Britain and the Association of British Muslims sent an open letter to British Prime Minister David Cameron suggesting that the group should be referred to as the "Un-Islamic State" or "UIS".
McGruber wrote: » Don't you mean Allah? Heh
Iwasfrozen wrote: » The last snarls of a dying dog thankfully.
Omackeral wrote: » So-called, as in Islamic State isn't a legitimate country, which is what they purport to be. The term "Islamic State" was objected to by Muslim groups in Europe. In Britain, members of the Islamic Society of Britain and the Association of British Muslims sent an open letter to British Prime Minister David Cameron suggesting that the group should be referred to as the "Un-Islamic State" or "UIS".
RobertKK wrote: » If only. There is no end in sight to terrorism. This was another horrific attack and as usual it in innocent people paying the price.
Bob24 wrote: » Yeah but they can call themselves whichever way they want. No-one would come and say "the so-called Irish Republican Army", because they don't represent the majority of the Irish and are not an actual army. If they want to be called IRA, this it what they are called.
Omackeral wrote: » So-called, as in Islamic State isn't a legitimate country, which is what they purport to be.
Bob24 wrote: » Yeah but they can call themselves whichever way they want. No-one comes and say "the so-called Irish Republican Army", because they don't represent the majority of the Irish and are not an actual army. If these people want to name their organisations IRA or Islamic State , you cannot chose another name for them.
511 wrote: » Just like the Taliban? Oh, wait. We won't be rid of ISIS that easily. As long as Islam exists, groups like ISIS will always exist. ISIS isn't a fresh idea, it's been done several times in the history of Islam and a new group will emerge to succeed them. Muhammad created an Islamic state during his days and these nutjobs are imitating him. That's why they're doing this and the first Muslims were as violent as ISIS are.
Two Tone wrote: » ****ing hell. And why kill fellow muslims?
Agricola wrote: » Just watching a short doc on Sky News about Bush/Blair and the 2003 invasion. If ever you needed proof that politicians literally make it up as they go along with rarely a back of a fag packet plan, then this is a perfect example. What an almighty clusterfúck those two tools started which we may never see the end of.
Killing for religion Something I don't understand
Conas wrote: » Rather than focusing on Islam, you should really be focusing on who's funding ISIS, and the individuals organizing and plotting these terrorist attacks. Laying the blame at the feet of Muhammad is laughable.