unkel wrote: » Well wear, alias no.9 Looks like I'm picking up another bangernomics car myself later today...
Bigus wrote: » You obviously haven't driven or sat in a C I T Y R O V E R , I had the experience when they were about a year old , and let's say I can see 2 reasons why a 9 year old one might only have 37000 miles racked up , firstly nobody would want To drive the miles in one and secondly I don't know if they'd make it beyond 39000 miles. I'd love to see the NCT stats on these .
alias no.9 wrote: » If they sold them for a modest markup on what they were reputedly paying Tata, they'd have made a market, just look at Dacia and Skoda of old, in fact that they'd had set a lower benchmark for the price of a new car. The metro was never cheap (to buy that is, it was definitely cheap and nastily put together).
unkel wrote: » I don't even reckon it would have had a solid market if very cheaply priced. Rover did it before (rushed a heap of sh1te to market - the Metro) and it surely greatly helped to start sinking the proud Rover ship. Such a shame.
alias no.9 wrote: » It's a cheap and nasty piece of **** that would have had a solid market if Rover hadn't overpriced it
punisher5112 wrote: » I very sadly had to drive quite a good few of those buckets that had a Rover badge badly glued on. It was like driving a shed on wheels and I was driving new ones. Dacia would tick very similar boxes to be honest god awful cars.
Duke O Smiley wrote: » If it was for the same price of the Skoda I would probably agree.
unkel wrote: » Go wash your mouth out with green soap, Colm
colm_mcm wrote: » They're both bottom of the barrel motoring. At least the cityrover is interesting seldom seen.
colm_mcm wrote: » Felicity are nasty little misery boxes, they're little more than a reskinned Favorit. Sure, Skoda came good after that with a little platform sharing, but let's not forget that the Felicia was nasty when new. I know cityrover a are rubbish too, but with both cars you're talking about a car for a few hundred euros with low tax. They're both bottom of the barrel motoring. At least the cityrover is interesting.
Full year NCT 04/17 tax till 08 -Very efficient on fuel - Heated leather seats -4 electric windows -alloy wheels -Air con -Sat Nav system -DVD -Auto start-stop system Driving 100% engine,gearbox and the high voltage battery is perfect! NO fault codes! Full service done ,before the NCT, any mechanical inspection welcome! Very reliable car.
Red Kev wrote: » Surprising how quick these became so rare. Seems to be plenty of new parts on it, keep it for a couple of years and you'll have little or no depreciation to worry about, possibly worth more than what you paid for it. 1995, 520i, 06/17https://www.donedeal.ie/cars-for-sale/mint-condition-e34-all-car-is-rebuild-and-like-new/12501504
unkel wrote: » Well spotted. Your man is not helping himself having the car down as a manual in his ad. And it's a dealer selling it. Sloppy! Also means there is probably very little room for negotiation...
Duke O Smiley wrote: » I don't think that he would purposely lie about it
unkel wrote: » Just sloppy, not lying. The car is far less desirable as a manual. Someone wasn't doing their job properly.
Sofiztikated wrote: » Is it me, or is the bonnet misaligned?