septictank wrote: » There are new owners and should open in about 5 weeks, the same guy's that run De Bruns.
Arciphel wrote: » Is that the place that used to be Brasserie 15? Well, that's the Twelfth Lock f%&$ed then
septictank wrote: » Give them a chance , they haven't opened their doors yet for fcuk sake.
Arciphel wrote: » If it's anything like De Bruns - I wouldn't have high hopes.
digiman wrote: » What's wrong with De Bruins? Food is quite good in there I think and pints are decent. Always a fairly good crowd in there. Best pub in D15 area I think anyway
hardCopy wrote: » I've only been in it once. Got food and enjoyed it. It's one of the best I've been to in the area, not that there's much competition. That'll be Browne's, Castello Bruno, De Bruin's and 12th Lock all under the same owner.
Godge wrote: » There are element of Brownes in De Bruns and Castello, hopefully 12th lock will be different but we don't need another steak on the stone place.
Gaspode wrote: » Lets face it, no-one ever really wanted steak on a stone. It's even worse than getting your lunch served on a wooden board or your drink in a jam jar.
amdublin wrote: » Do people really care about things like that? I cycled past it every day - looks to me like they are upgrading the patio area. I can't see what is the problem/what is making residents wary....? Doesn't look to me like they are extending anything.
angryIreGamer wrote: » That kinda depends. An extension could start overlooking peoples homes, or people could be afraid of noise late at night. .....
dodzy wrote: » What bloody homes are at risk of being overlooked? It's sandwiched between train tracks & a canal FFS. Seriously, some busybodies have just way too much time on their hands.
athtrasna wrote: » You can still see into the apartments on the other side of the canal!
xl500 wrote: » A major extension has been ongoing on the outside area including new shack and paved patio etc etc This has all been carried out without planning permission and Fingal CC are currently investigating NIce to see a Responsible Person who has regard for planning law is taking over
SnakePlissken wrote: » Absolute amateurs whoever they are, that they believed they could erect that large metal framed awning without any planning in place boggles the mind.
xl500 wrote: » Well maybe not they probably knew exactly what they were doing put it up quickly before anyone even knows what you are doing then apply for retention etc if its refused An enforcement action has to be taken which can take a long time all the time an unauthorised structure continues This is happening all over the country and its down to very poor planning enforcement