A Brad Maddox Guy wrote: » Sure we could easily finish 2nd with just 3 points now. I would 100% take a draw tomorrow to go into the last game in second against a team that would already have 1st secured. That's mostly because I think Belgium are better than they showed against Italy (not that that would be difficult).
Bounty Hunter wrote: » maybe it's not 100% but imo 4 points will put a team through be that in 2nd or 3rd
Bounty Hunter wrote: » If we beat em, were through. Even a draw would be a good result now though when you consider that the Italians will no doubt be rotating players in our game though of course you gotta hope they (Ireland) will be going for the win.
Bounty Hunter wrote: » bit of a brain fart from me ther not realizing that Belgium dropped points already. I reckon they will beat 1 of us or Sweden though, obviously I hope its the swedes after we have forced them to have to do or die in their final match by taking 1 or 3 points from them (1 more likely) tomorrow. edit: boom Italy 1-0 suits Ireland down to the ground especially as we will facethem in the final game and they are now already true so may rest players and try to avoid suspensions for others.
Bounty Hunter wrote: » What would happen re-3rd spot and potential qualifying for the next round via third (which could be possible with 3 pts and 0GD) if Ireland & Sweden both drew all 3 games? not necessarily expecting that or anything but alphabetical order? R (Republic) before S?
CastorTroy wrote: » Happy birthday AG! How're the exams going? Can't be nice having your 18th during them
Uriah Beautiful Self-denial wrote: » Haha I love it Maggle! Absolutely gutted Sturridge just scored the winner for England. Oh, I turned 18 today by the way!
Uriah Beautiful Self-denial wrote: » I really wish I could've seen Tiger Woods in his prime.
Kankan14 wrote: » Would someone care to explain to me what e3 is in laymans terms please. Ive heard/seen lots of people talk about it but I have no clue. Is it a big deal in technology or something?
Mr.Nice Guy wrote: » I just think it's cringeworthy to try to get oneself over as the best fans because it means the mentality is 'me, me, me' rather than 'support the team.' And from a wrestling viewpoint it is actually harmful to the business when fans put themselves before the guys in the ring. When you're watching a real fight (and wrestling is supposed to be presented as real despite being fake) then you are supposed to be invested emotionally in one guy winning. I watched a documentary on the Thrilla in Manila fight the other night and the audience weren't trying to get their chants in but were engrossed in what's going on. To quote Jim Cornette, wrestling fans standing for Jerry Lawler's comeback is a great crowd reaction and not a bunch of guys chanting 'We are awesome'. But obviously not everyone seems to agree. On a brighter note I will say that the 'Stand up for the Ulster man' chant for the NI fan who died was a terrific gesture from our fans.